Semimojo: straw man. I don't insist there's no relationship, but I want to see evidence.
ransomnote: Then you need a translator to help us understand that when you claim the Expose is lying and I'm posting lies, what you really mean is that you want to see evidence.
Semimojo: Can someone show there's a higher rate of blindness in the vaccinated?
ransomnote: Check the thread I posted at the bottom of this post.
You ignore the extensive proof it's killing people in unprecedented numbers, I'm certain it's a waste of my time for me to post more proof you'll ignore, but I posted it for others.
Your fixation on parsing text in order to protect the 'good reputation of vaccines' when 10 year olds are having heart attacks and athletes are dropping dead in unprecedented numbers is not a good look.
Semimojo: Theexpose.uk, and you, know not all reported blindness is due to the vaccine. In fact, none of it may be - we don't have the data to know.
ransomnote: The Expose knows, as I do, that a general statement does not rule out all exceptions. We have ample data to be well versed in the deaths/debilitating injuries and you pretend we dont as if the 'vaccines' are a new novelty and we must wait for more data, more proof.
How much proof is enough? NEVER ENOUGH in your book. You want to parse the wording on an article about eye damage, while the crimes against humanity continue without any objection from you. The Expose made a generalize statement which you alone insist should be translated to mean 100%. You are going to call everyone liars and then hold your breath until they prove Covid vaccines are harmful, again?
Semimojo: Yet, in an attempt to frightening and sensationalize, they say it was all due to the vaccine.
ransomnote: I would say frightening and horrifying are accurate terms for the killing and maiming taking place right before your eyes, while you translate articles for us to mean different things.
Semimojo:And you're twisting yourself into knots trying to defend their mendacity.
ransomnote: I'm explaining word meanings to you. How I wish you cared about what Fauci/CDC says and does as people die and suffer around us. But, you don't. What Fauci/CDC says and does, what happens to children with strokes and blood clots - you don't have any requests they proof anything the CDC/Fauci and others say about the vaccines. No proof needed - those traitors' assertions are sufficient for you. The key point, the center of focus for you, is parsing text in article like The Expose. Priorities.
Covid 'vaccines' account for 63%% of all reports of blindness post vaccination which the CDC published to VAERS throughout its 30 years of operation.
Medalerts.org ^ | 12/18/2021 | vanity
Posted on 12/18/2021, 3:11:54 PM by ransomnote
LOL. I know it's a lie when that say all of the blindness cases are due to the vaccine. You do too.
What I want is evidence that any of the cases are due to the vaccine.
You can't provide that.
Check the thread I posted at the bottom of this post.
You ignore the extensive proof it's killing people in unprecedented numbers, I'm certain it's a waste of my time for me to post more proof you'll ignore, but I posted it for others.
You've posted no evidence it's killing people at all and your other post is just standard-issue VAERS misrepresentation.
Where is the evidence of a higher rate of ophthalmologic problems among the vaccinated?
athletes are dropping dead in unprecedented numbers...
Could you please provide some evidence that this is the case? If true I'd like to investigate. Show some evidence.
How much proof is enough?
Just a little evidence would be a good start. You don't have any, let alone proof.
More importantly, all of the world's public health agencies track this stuff and say the vaccines are safe.
You're making an extraordinary claim, that all of the professionals are wrong, and extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
Yet you provide none at all.
The Expose made a generalize statement which you alone insist should be translated to mean 100%.
Patent BS.
They said:
"132 people have reported suffering blindness due to the injection."
That's simply not true and you and they know it.
But it makes their story much more compelling than telling the truth - that there have been some reports of blindness but we don't know if there are any more among the vaccinated than among the unvaccinated.
That truth wouldn't get them clicks nor you replies here on FR.
The key point, the center of focus for you, is parsing text in article like The Expose.
Your "whataboutism" aside, the key point is you shouldn't post articles that you know are lies.
You've said you know not all reported adverse events are due to the vaccines.
Yet you keep posting articles from theexpose.uk which explicitly say all of the adverse events are vaccine caused.
You know better but continue to do it and when called on it you wave your hands and try to change the subject to Fauci.
Have some self respect and make honest arguments.