The lie is that every adverse event following an vaccination is caused by the vaccine.
There isn't an honest FReeper who wouldn't acknowledge that fact yet people keep posting these lying articles stating otherwise.
I understand why liars like theexpose.uk keep publishing the lies - they get money from clicks.
I don't know why FReepers who know better keep posting them here.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine?, semimojo quoted: |
| Well that settles it, I guess everyone having adverse reactions are lying, even if it is documented. semimojo wrote: The lie is that every adverse event following an vaccination is caused by the vaccine. ransomnote wrote: It doesn't have to be 'every event' before it matters. VAERS is a safety signal and then your kind insists we all ignore the signal completely. The annual average in vaers prior to Covid bioweapons ('vaccines') was 150 persons dying for about every 250 million vaccinations. No one suggested that all 150 persons (annually) were from whatever vaccines they were given - but it's important to track such information and look for unexplained changes. When the Covid 'vaccines' were under 90 million (late January 2021), there were already 1200 deaths recorded in VAERS post Covid 'vaccines'. Normally we don't have Covid 'vaccines' and the annual count would be 150, but Covid 'vaccines' added 1200 records of death. Any other product would be pulled off the market at 50 deaths. In late January, the vaccination program was still ramping up, and they didn't hesitate to force the vaccines on the public and ignore all safety signals. In the 30 year history of VAERS data collection,there was a total of roughly 10 thousand deaths reported to VAERS (not all directly related, and this would only be a small fraction of actual events as many are never reported to the CDC). Covid 'vaccines' racked up that amount in just 1 year, a rate of 30 times 'normal' reports, whether directly caused or not. Can you see why any experimental vaccine having about the same number of death reports in one year as the combination of all vaccines spanning a 30 year history just might matter? Just recently, we've learned that the Pfizer trial had 1200 deaths in 2 or 3 months. I think their phase III trial was 50,000. Are you capable of understsanding why this is a concern? How about the fact that 50% of Covid vaccine reports of death occur within 48 hours of 'vaccination'? I'm writing facts you will ignore, and the next lament/blame storming you do, you'll pretend I never wrote it, so you don't know it etc. semimojo wrote: There isn't an honest FReeper who wouldn't acknowledge that fact yet people keep posting these lying articles stating otherwise. ransomnote wrote: Your kind agonizes of flat numbers reported for VAERS as if your ox is being gored. I don't see assertions that every case is directly caused. Are you worried about the inference, rather than any statement? Well then why doesn't the inferance of horrific levels of unprecedented death and disabling injury re Covid 'vaccines' bother you, but the idea that some may interpret statements to mean 100% of every report in VAERS is causal. By the way, a causal argument is made by Steve Kirsch and his team: "Each and every symptom we looked at satisfies all the traditional Bradford-Hill causality criteria using both absolute rate elevation compared to baseline rates as well as Dose 1 vs. Dose 2 response disparities." You see, sometimes the CDC lies, and the CDC's insistance that there are no causal data, and that VAERS can't render causal data is just backside covering. But, that's Steve Kirsch's team; I haven't been saying every single case is directly a result and I haven't seen anyone else say it. What matters to you is that some of us are paying attention to a safety signal the CDC wants ignored. semimojo wrote: I understand why liars like theexpose.uk keep publishing the lies - they get money from clicks. ransomnote wrote: Independent researchers, journalists and citizens have stepped into the void to get past the censors and it is KILLIN' your kind. You keep demanding we only cite what amounts to talking points and labeling anyone who gets past the censors as liars out for money. The CDC/NIH/FDA are growing wealthy on their patents on drugs paid for by taxpayer dollars, but that's not the kind of thing of which you disapprove. semimojo wrote: I don't know why FReepers who know better keep posting them here. ransomnote wrote: And so ends semimojo's cryin'-in-his-beer because the board owner won't enact censorship rules which serve Fauci's interests. *yawn* |