| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Why are so many people going Blind after getting the Covid-19 Vaccine?, semimojo quoted: |
| Well that settles it, I guess everyone having adverse reactions are lying, even if it is documented. semimojo wrote: The lie is that every adverse event following an vaccination is caused by the vaccine. ransomnote wrote: It doesn't have to be 'every event' before it matters. VAERS is a safety signal and then your kind insists we all ignore the signal completely. The annual average in vaers prior to Covid bioweapons ('vaccines') was 150 persons dying for about every 250 million vaccinations. No one suggested that all 150 persons (annually) were from whatever vaccines they were given - but it's important to track such information and look for unexplained changes. When the Covid 'vaccines' were under 90 million (late January 2021), there were already 1200 deaths recorded in VAERS post Covid 'vaccines'. Normally we don't have Covid 'vaccines' and the annual count would be 150, but Covid 'vaccines' added 1200 records of death. Any other product would be pulled off the market at 50 deaths. In late January, the vaccination program was still ramping up, and they didn't hesitate to force the vaccines on the public and ignore all safety signals. In the 30 year history of VAERS data collection,there was a total of roughly 10 thousand deaths reported to VAERS (not all directly related, and this would only be a small fraction of actual events as many are never reported to the CDC). Covid 'vaccines' racked up that amount in just 1 year, a rate of 30 times 'normal' reports, whether directly caused or not. Can you see why any experimental vaccine having about the same number of death reports in one year as the combination of all vaccines spanning a 30 year history just might matter? Just recently, we've learned that the Pfizer trial had 1200 deaths in 2 or 3 months. I think their phase III trial was 50,000. Are you capable of understsanding why this is a concern? How about the fact that 50% of Covid vaccine reports of death occur within 48 hours of 'vaccination'? I'm writing facts you will ignore, and the next lament/blame storming you do, you'll pretend I never wrote it, so you don't know it etc. semimojo wrote: There isn't an honest FReeper who wouldn't acknowledge that fact yet people keep posting these lying articles stating otherwise. ransomnote wrote: Your kind agonizes of flat numbers reported for VAERS as if your ox is being gored. I don't see assertions that every case is directly caused. Are you worried about the inference, rather than any statement? Well then why doesn't the inferance of horrific levels of unprecedented death and disabling injury re Covid 'vaccines' bother you, but the idea that some may interpret statements to mean 100% of every report in VAERS is causal. By the way, a causal argument is made by Steve Kirsch and his team: "Each and every symptom we looked at satisfies all the traditional Bradford-Hill causality criteria using both absolute rate elevation compared to baseline rates as well as Dose 1 vs. Dose 2 response disparities." You see, sometimes the CDC lies, and the CDC's insistance that there are no causal data, and that VAERS can't render causal data is just backside covering. But, that's Steve Kirsch's team; I haven't been saying every single case is directly a result and I haven't seen anyone else say it. What matters to you is that some of us are paying attention to a safety signal the CDC wants ignored. semimojo wrote: I understand why liars like theexpose.uk keep publishing the lies - they get money from clicks. ransomnote wrote: Independent researchers, journalists and citizens have stepped into the void to get past the censors and it is KILLIN' your kind. You keep demanding we only cite what amounts to talking points and labeling anyone who gets past the censors as liars out for money. The CDC/NIH/FDA are growing wealthy on their patents on drugs paid for by taxpayer dollars, but that's not the kind of thing of which you disapprove. semimojo wrote: I don't know why FReepers who know better keep posting them here. ransomnote wrote: And so ends semimojo's cryin'-in-his-beer because the board owner won't enact censorship rules which serve Fauci's interests. *yawn* |
But there are, that's the point.
Theexpose.uk says:
"132 people have reported suffering blindness due to the injection."
That's only true if every adverse event is caused by the vaccine but as you've just said, they aren't.
That means theexpose.uk is lying.
And you keep posting those lies here.
I had a number of individual comments I though about making, but have decided to copy a detailed letter I sent a political activist friend recently. First I should state my general position. Since so many people are deficient in major nutrients that seem to be specifically involved in Covid illness, our government and leaders should be urging people to improve their nutritional statuse with food, supplements, and sunshine. I suspect a lot of the adverse vaccine reactions are caused by nutritional deficiency states. For example Vitamin D deficiency can cause oversized blood platelets to grow. Some capilaries are so small only a single red blood cell can pass at a time. Enlarged platelets—Covid toe anyone?? Failure of government to urge Vitamin D consumption and/or testing especially in winter, and especially for dark skinned people I consider criminally negligent. At any rate, on with my letter:
“I did not know of I could refind this “encyclopedia” of information on alternate treatment of Covid-19. Eleftherios Gkioulekas (don’t ask me how to pronounce that last name) is a PhD Mathetician who is preserving many important pieces of information about the fight to end Covid. His disclaimer is at the bottom of this link. There are hundreds of links listed, so I recomment viewing this on a computer, not a phone. Some of what I promised to send I found here, other I will have to find elsewhere, but I will list them below this master list. Cheers, Lee
https://faculty.utrgv.edu/eleftherios.gkioulekas/zelenko/index.html A number of links are at “Bitchute” since Google & Youtube have censored and removed links.
https://faculty.utrgv.edu/eleftherios.gkioulekas/zelenko/Vladimir-Zelenko-treatment.pdf This is the original 3/23/20 letter with ccs to Trump and Meadows. I found this at my first link above about 20 lines down at “introduction” where line 5 has the word March and click gives the original letter. [Did Mark Meadows persuade Trump to NOT urge ZINC use, or was it Fauci or both and why???]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CBYLPbxzf0vgi6IRg5Ay6kGwAYX3uVjGS8n0SzQbSAs/edit Here is one of Dr. Zelenko’s revised protocols for prophylaxis (prevention) and treatment of mild/early Covid. The part of Vitamin D and seasonal illness is especially interesting. Also over time he has shifted to Quercetin as the ZINC ionophore, rather than HCQ or Ivermectin as it is available without a doctor’s prescription. Also he has shifted to using the antiobiotic Doxycycline rather than Azithromycin as it is safer for anti-bacterial protection.
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/497838-nih-begins-studying-hydroxychloroquine-and-azithromycin-as-covid-19 This is one report of the decision on May 14, 2020 by NIH to study HCQ and Azithromycin, not the link I saw months ago. Here is Fauci’s quote I mentioned: “We urgently need a safe and effective treatment for COVID-19. Repurposing existing drugs is an attractive option because these medications have undergone extensive testing, allowing them to move quickly into clinical trials and accelerating their potential approval for COVID-19 treatment,” Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. The article also mentions Trump as promoting HCQ and Azithromycin [no zinc by May 2020].
I was facinated to hear Trump as he walked from the helicopter that took him back from Walter Reed to the White House. He was talking about monoclonal antibodies, Remdesivir and other APPROVED treatments. He then muttered, it sounded to me in an angry tone, “and I took Zinc.” Had he finally realized he had been fooled and used?
https://www.fauquier.com/news/update-fauquier-hospital-reports-it-has-complied-with-court-order-asks-for-contempt-order-to/article_8cb9853e-5c3d-11ec-8635-376fda43665b.html This is the court case I think, not DC but Fauquier Co. I will try to contact the reporter or lawyer or doctor as while Ivermectin is good, the zinc, Vitamin D, etc. are also critical. [This in connection with one of a number of doctors wanting to use Ivermectin.]
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/ This 2011 article is the fascinating story of Ivermectins discovery, development and use to aid/protect over a billion people directly threatened by the parasitic diseases “river blindness” and Elephantiasis as well as other parasitic human diseases. Most importantly, “Ivermectin has continually proved to be astonishingly safe for human use. Indeed, it is such a safe drug, with minimal side effects, that it can be administered by non-medical staff and even illiterate individuals in remote rural communities, provided that they have had some very basic, appropriate training.” Scary news for the fat cats of big pharma and big medicine. [Also shows the stupidity of celebrities ridiculing this “horse paste.”]