Source Data
Posted on 12/11/2021 10:07:57 AM PST by ransomnote
Serious questions need to be answered as to why Boris Johnson’s Government have decided to restrict the freedoms of the unvaccinated population through the introduction of Vaccine Passports, when the latest official data shows that the vaccinated population have accounted for 3 in every 5 Covid-19 cases, 3 in every 5 Covid-19 hospitalisations, and 4 in every 5 Covid-19 deaths, in England since August 16th 2021.
During a national Covid-19 briefing that took place on Tuesday December 8th, the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom announced that ‘Plan B’ would be implemented in England from Wednesday December 15th, which would entail ‘working from home’ (if you can) orders, and the introduction of Vaccine Passports.
The reason given for the commencement of ‘Plan B’ is that it has to be done to protect the public from the alleged new Omicron variant of the Covid-19 virus. A variant which as of December 11th, has failed to cause a single fatality in the UK, with just several hundred cases allegedly being confirmed.
A new law will come into effect from Wednesday December 15th, which will state that Vaccine Passports will become mandatory for entry to nightclubs and other large venues, including Premier League football matches and concerts. We’re told they will be required for indoor settings of 500 people or more, outdoor settings of 4,000 people or more, and any setting with 10,000 attendees or more.
There will be many in England who believe Vaccine Passports are the answer to their prayers. Two years of misinformation, and disinformation mixed with propaganda published by the mainstream media can do that to people. But unfortunately the official data published by the UK Government proves that they are far from it, and suggests Vaccine Passports have absolutely nothing to do with protecting public health, and instead everything to do with controlling the nation.
The UK Health Security Agency (PHE) is an executive agency of the Department of Health and Social Care and recently replaced Public Health England. The Chief Executive of the agency is Dr Jenny Harries OBE, who you may recognise from the television as she has served as Deputy Chief Medical Officer for England throughout the pandemic.
The UKHSA publish a weekly ‘Vaccine Surveillance’ report which contains data on Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths by vaccination status over a period of four weeks, and unfortunately for the vaccinated population, the official data shows that they have accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths for at least the past four months.
We have used the following official reports for our analysis –
Table 8 of the latest report shows the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status in England. The table may have been attributed a different number in previous reports published by the UKHSA, but the following chart shows cases by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 16 Aug 21 to 05 Dec 21.
The chart shows that between August and early September, the fully vaccinated population accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases. However, between the middle of September and early October this switched to the not-vaccinated population accounting for the majority of cases. This is most likely due to children returning to school in September and being “encouraged” to test on a regular basis.
But between October 11th and December 5th the roles reversed again, and it is the fully vaccinated population that have accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases in England.
This data alone puts an end to the myth that it is selfish to not be vaccinated, because it’s quite clear the jabs do not prevent infection or transmission. Which begs the question as to why Boris Johnson has decided to implement Vaccine Passports in England?
The above chart shows the cumulative number of cases by vaccination status between 16 Aug 21 and 05 Dec 21, and illustrates quite clearly that the fully vaccinated have accounted for the majority of cases since August.
What we can see from the above is that the unvaccinated had accounted for the majority of cases up to October 10th, however since this date there has been a switch with the fully vaccinated taking the lead, hitting a cumulative total of 1.5 million confirmed cases by Dec 5th.
When including the 258,387 confirmed cases among the partly vaccinated during this period, the total cases among the vaccinated population rises to 1,757,444. Whilst the number of cases among the unvaccinated population during this period of 16 weeks has amounted to 1,403,100.
Table 9 of the latest report shows the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations by vaccination status in England. The table may have been attributed a different number in previous reports published by the UKHSA, but the following chart shows cases by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 16 Aug 21 to 05 Dec 21.
You may have heard several times this week on national television from people such as Dr Hilary, Lorraine Kelly, and Martin Kemp that “90% of the people currently in hospital with Covid-19 have not been vaccinated”.
Well it looks like they have been lying to you because the official UK Government data the fully vaccinated population have accounted for the majority of Covid-19 hospitalisation every month since at least August.
The above chart shows the cumulative number of hospitalisations by vaccination status between 16 Aug 21 and 05Dec 21, and shows just how bad things have actually been for the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated.
Between Aug 16 and Dec 05, the unvaccinated population accounted for 11,767 Covid-19 hospitalisations. But the vaccinated population have accounted for nearly double the amount, recording 19,730 hospitalisations, with 18,406 of those being among the 2/3 dose vaccinated population. This means the vaccinated population have accounted for 63% of Covid-19 hospitalisations since August 2021.
Table 10 (b) of the latest report shows the number of Covid-19 hospitalisations by vaccination status in England. The table may have been attributed a different number in previous reports published by the UKHSA, but the following chart shows cases by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 16 Aug 21 to 05 Dec 21.
The above chart proves that the fully vaccinated population have accounted for the majority of Covid-19 deaths every single month since August 2021, with things really taking a turn for the worse in October.
The highest number of Covid-19 deaths in single four week period among the fully vaccinated population has been 3,284, whereas the highest number of Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population in a four week period has been just 850. That’s a 286% difference.
The above chart shows the cumulative number of deaths by vaccination status between 16 Aug 21 and 05 Dec 21, and illustrates quite clearly that this is very much a pandemic of the fully vaccinated.
Between 16 Aug 21 and 05 Dec 21 there were 3,070 Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population in England, compared to 12,058 deaths among the vaccinated population during the same time frame. That is a 293% difference.
The official data shows the the vaccinated population have accounted for 56% of Covid-19 cases, 63% of hospitalisations, and 80% of deaths over the past 16 weeks in England.
It’s quite clear that the jabs do not prevent infection or transmission, but they are alleged to reduce the risk of hospitalisation and death. However, if this were the case then should we not be seeing a graph that looks more like this?
So why aren’t we?
It could have something to do witht he fact that the data suggests the Covid-19 injections are actually increasing the risk of death due to Covid-19 rather than reducing it by the claimed 95%.
The following graph shows the case-fatality rate among the not-vaccinated population, and the case-fatality rate among the 2/3 dose vaccinated population over the past 16 weeks.
The case-fatality rate is calculated by dividing the number of known deaths by the number of known cases among the population. As we can see from the above the case-fatality rate among the not-vaccinated population is just 0.2%, which is what is in line with the average case-fatality rate in 2020 before a Covid-19 injection was introduced to the masses.
However, the case-fatality rate among the fully vaccinated population is much higher, equating to 0.8%. Therefore the fully vaccinated are 4 times / 300% more likely to die if exposed to the Covid-19 virus based on official UK Government figures.
The following graph shows the hospitalisation-fatality rate among the not-vaccinated population, and the hospitalisation-fatality rate among the 2/3 dose vaccinated population over the past 16 weeks.
The hospitalisation-fatality rate is calculated by dividing the number of known deaths by the number of known hospitalisations among the population. As we can see from the above the hospitalsiation-fatality rate among the not-vaccinated population is 26%.
But the hospitalisation-fatality rate among the fully vaccinated population is frighteningly higher equating to a shocking 63%. This means the fully vaccinated population are 2.4 / 142% more likely to die once hospitalised with Covid-19.
So now that you know that the double / triple jabbed population have accounted for 3 in every 5 cases, 3 in every 5 hospitalisations, and 4 in every 5 Deaths over the past 4 months in England, and that the UK Government has been laughing at you since at least Christmas 2020 through their alleged Christmas parties, are you going to allow them to take away your freedom yet again in response to an alleged variant that has so far caused zero fatalities, or are you going to stand up, carry on living, and say “no” this time around?
Because this will not end until we all say it does.
Why does the report state on page 6
“Affer 2 doses, observed vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease with the Delta variant reaches approximately 65 to 70% with AstraZeneca Vaxzevria and 80 to 95% with Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty and Moderna
Spikevax”
Ransomnote - are we looking at the same report? Why does the report say Pfizer is 80 to 95 percent effective? HMMMM? I’m waiting.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1039677/Vaccine_surveillance_report_-_week_49.pdf
This is ridiculous. If you are vaccinated: you can still get COVID, you can transmit COVID, you can be hospitalized with COVID. The only benefit seems to be that you will not get a deadly version of the virus. That's it.
And, considering how many bad reactions to the "vaccine" that we are seeing (but, media refuses to look into -- exactly what is their job?), we need to pull this damn thing back and actually do some long term studies.
I started having my doubts about this "vaccine" when it was the ONLY solution that they would accept. Natural immunity -- nope. Theraputics -- nope. So, I asked myself, Why? Why, are they so adamant? Why is it the shot, or nothing? Why?
Time for some questions to be asked of Doctor Mengele (oops, sorry) Fauci. Perhaps something like a "cage fight". Fauci in a cage; and, Rand Paul questioning him until we get some real answers about this.
Absolutely... It is right in our faces with a historical pattern.
Population control.
I am not taking ANY of these experimental shots. Real vaccines take 10 years on average to develop, not 9 months. NOBODY is vaccinated for covid because these fetal tissue and (42 trillion per dose) spike protein shots are NOT real actual vaccines. Science!
P.S. And the so-called ‘boosters’ are just full strength regular covid shots.
My landlord told me yesterday, that he is hoping to get his 2nd BOOSTER soon (in other words, 4 ‘clot shots’)! He also is pushing his son and daughter-in-law to get all seven kids vaxxed. That family is not interested in the slightest, in getting the ‘clot shots’. They don’t trust the medico/political/MSM establishment at all. I say, “Good on them!” The oldest of their kids is 24 or so, and the youngest is 4.
Normally, my LL is a reasonably intelligent man, though a bit of a hypochondriac. His wife got the two shots and PCR test only because it was required, to be able to fly to their shack in Panama. He’s still here in the PRC (Politically Repressive Canada), planning on flying to Panama as soon as he can.
Does anyone know how to find something similar for those vaccinate for Measles, Mumps Rubella? How about Chicken Pox, and shingles? How about for the seasonal Flu? TB? Hepatitis B? Smallpox?
The reason I ask is, someone will come on here and say “OF COURSE there are more vaxxed sick, hospitalized and dying. There are more of them. Which is an idiotic response. Either the treatments work, or they do not. I can tell you with certainty, you are a fool for taking the shot. You are destroying the country, the freedom for all people, and participating in a mass “gaslighting” event to end all.
Aw, c’mon, man! All those deaths among the vaxxed are just COINCIDENCES! YOU NEED YOUR CURRENT THREE OR FOUR SHOTS to live!
-—The medico/political/MSM line
The inclusion of the people 18 and under.
I cracked open the most recent report, and focused on the case and fatality Tables.
In the aggregate, the analysis is sound.
But the 18 and under crowd account for a massive number of cases but only about four fatalities.
If you strip away the youngsters' numbers, the case fatality rates by age and in total favor those who've accepted shots.
I am NOT saying the shots are a long-run positive thing, or that there isn't a whole lot of data massaging etc. happening.
But this kind of fun-with-numbers is what I expect from Fauci.
Birth control, women’s lib to reduce willingness to breed, abortion, environmental/climate agenda to reduce food availability and return us to the stone age, promoting same sex partnerships because they can’t breed, outlawing self defense while legalizing crime, legalizing deadly drugs, pushing drugs on the mentally ill so they go crazy and kill other humans in mass, creating oppression and in turn depression and suicide, Etc. Both the virus and the jab are just another fork of the long effort towards the same goal of culling human numbers.
Please read #30 and I think you will see the very real historical connections in the agenda. When you back up and get a wider perspective it becomes far too obvious, even predictable...
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Whilst you were distracted by a Christmas Party the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully Vaccinated account for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 Deaths in England since August, brookwood wrote: |
Why does the report state on page 6 Ransomnote - are we looking at the same report? Why does the report say Pfizer is 80 to 95 percent effective? HMMMM? I’m waiting. |
For the record, I don't care if you are waiting. You're not special.
You left out their means of measurement:
"Vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic COVID-19 has been assessed in England based on community testing data linked to
vaccination data from the National Immunisation Management System (NIMS), cohort studies such as the COVID Infection Survey
and GP electronic health record data. "
Now have a look at their wording "observed vaccine effectiveness against symptomatic disease".
Factor in this is a public health agency abusing the public's trust, just like our own CDC. The following is therefore what I believe to be the most likely reason they put forth such nonsense numbers.
Using an invalid Covid test with a false positive rate of 90%+, and the fact that the agencies are running PCR tests at higher rates for unvaccinated, than they are for vaccinated (greater false positives for unvaccinated result), the NIH then falsely claims that the 'vaccine' is blocking SYMPTOMS of illness, when in fact they are pointing to false postives in healthy people.
There's a reason people are being forced to take these vaccines, and it's not because they 'work'. When the NIH starts reporting the devastating deaths and illnesses, we can begin to believe they may be reporting at least partial truth.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Whilst you were distracted by a Christmas Party the UK Gov. released a report confirming the Fully Vaccinated account for 4 in every 5 Covid-19 Deaths in England since August, Steve_Seattle wrote: |
| If the charts are based on actual data, they need to be adjusted for things like age, co-morbidities, and percent of population vaccinated vs unvaccinated to give a clear picture of the actual impact of the vaccines. Nonetheless, they show that the claim that we are now in "a pandemic of the unvaccinated" is a complete lie. Setting aside the controversy about vaccine side-effects, it appears that - at best - the vaccines give you a moderate, short-lived benefit. They are nowhere close to being the magic bullet that their defenders claim (but apparently don't really believe, given their obsession with the unvaccinated). |
*
The "moderate, short-lived benefit" of the vaccines is an illusion. England has two time limits they report, either 28 days or 60 days. So England counts a positive (false/asymptomatic or not) PCR test taken up to 60 days or 28 days prior to an actual illness or death, as a current death/hospitalization from Covid. Not whether you are actually ill with a respiratory condition, but if you had a positive test, using an invalid test up to 60 days prior that they keep forcing people to take over and over again (eventually you WILL keep false positives on record).
Then, the 'vaccinated' PCR tests are run at a lower rate (less inaccurate) than the unvaccinated.
Then, they typically don't count a person as 'vaccinated' until 2 weeks after 2nd Dose (or is it Booster, now?). That leaves out people who die as a result of the vaccine, whether due to anaphylaxis, stroke, heart attack etc. or via collapse of your immune system causing you to die abruptly of illnesses you could normally fight off, including influenzas, respiratory diseases etc.
Then England maintains a number of people whom they say are 'unlinked'. This number of people could alter the statistics. If they are unlinked, that could mean unvaccinated - because it seems a person vaccinated would have records (links). So that number is ignored statistically, and we don't know which group they belong to (see page 31).
Then recall this comparison of the vaccinated to the unvaccinated is done at a time all treatment is denied sick people. And sick people are then subjected to Remdesivir and Mizadolam and they are medically exterminated. May I suggest this happens to all, but is even more likely among the unvaccinated? There was some controversy about the outstanding amount of Midazolam ordered by the head of the UK agency before he left that position.
Hospitals Are Killing Thousands with Remdesivir | Guest: Dr. Brian Ardis
Conservative Review Podcast ^ | October 22, 2021 | Daniel Horowitz
Most Covid-19 Deaths were a direct result of the administration of Midazolam or Remdesivir – By Dr Mike Yeadon
theexpose.uk ^ | OCTOBER 11, 2021 | Dr. Mike Yeadon
This quote from page 6 makes it sound worse for the most fragile who are "vaccinated", which defies the reason to 'vaccinate' the vulnerable.
"Reduced antibody response and vaccine
effectiveness were seen after one dose of vaccine among the immunosuppressed group, however, after a second dose the
reduction in vaccine effectiveness is smaller (5)."
I thot the shot kept you from catching the China-Flu?
I thot the shot made it so the China-Flu didnt kill you, just made you sick for a few days?
Not a very good vaccine.
| shots | 0 shot | 1 shot | 2+ shots |
|---|---|---|---|
| population | 16,979,523 | 4,503,965 | 46,775,202 |
| Deaths | 3070 | 514 | 11444 |
| Death Rate | .000180527 | .000115227 | .000243671 |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
