(and Humblegunner) want you to know there is no such thing.
They have instructed their minions to properly inform you and to
soundly disparage any and all dissent.
~Easy
Good take Atlantic. I'm sure everyone will agree with you. /s
The Atlantic targets one loony conspiracy and ignores the worldwide reality of child-trafficking and sex-trafficking, which sometimes overlap, and which no one with any knowledge denies.
You sex trafficking deniers are coming across as desperate.
You can smell the fear.
The Atlantic, still in the throes of Trump Derangement Syndrome, attacked any idea forwarded that child-trafficking does and has existed. One thing not covered by the Biden propaganda MSM, was the success that President Trump had with finding the child trafficking sinkholes, rescuing the children and prosecuting the offenders.
By their very article, I charge The Atlantic as defending the whole child trafficking business, since this article was meant as a deflection.
Isn’t the Atlantic one of those rags that lie *a*l*l* the time?
They have instructed their minions to properly inform you and to
soundly disparage any and all dissent.
~Easy
The Atlantic has negative credibility; if they say its fake then it becomes more likely to be true.
So, the sex traffickers the feds have sent to prison didn’t do anything after all?
Sick SOBs!
Is this the rag that is being funded by Jobs’ widow?
So far Left to make herself feel good with her pals, yet due to her vast, capitalist earned wealth, will never have to experience any of the hardships that Leftist ideas bring on the ordinary folks like me and everyone else.
mumblehummer is a pedophile
Wasn’t “The Atlantic” the outfit that had an article attempting to normalize pedophila?
I’m sure Craig “Sawman” Sawyer of Veterans for Child Rescue might differ. And Trump was cracking down on the child traffickers
u·biq·ui·tous
/yo͞oˈbikwədəs/
adjective
present, appearing, or found everywhere.
Found everywhere? No. Found in high places among the powerful and elite? Yes. As the author rightly points out by pointing at Epstein, which is just the tip of the situation, but clearly and without question illustrates the 'tastes' of powerful men (and women) *looking at you Hillary* and one of the tools they use to infiltrate and maintain control of every institution on the earth.
This propaganda piece is nothing more than the ongoing Derp State effort to minimize, sweep under the rug, and hide these practices. Q brought the heat and they REALLY didn't like that.
Americans who knew little about QAnon became heavily involved, and when QAnon moved on to other concerns—a stolen election, a poisonous vaccine—these volunteers stayed devoted to the cause of opposing child sex trafficking.
So-called 'Qanon' never 'moved on'. This was an ongoing theme from the start and lies at the core of the international derp state corruption and rot.
The CIA propagandist rightly agrees here with Q (though he doesn't know it) when Q said ....
By the way, the lies in this article, like the ones about the USNS Comfort
were identified by Anons in real time, as lies to paint researchers as idiots, even while the BS was being disseminated by the glowing shills that never
ever leave our debate.
They will never stop trying to manage the narrative with lie after lie.
Epstein had their management on speed dial, no doubt.
I remember when all these mags were full of politically neutral, interesting subjects.
Qanons will Qtard.
There is child trafficking going on.
There’s no such thing as ‘QAnon’.