PING
No doubt the families feel way better. “RARE”
They haven't proven to be so.
What was the size of each lot?
Were they all the same size?
If you can't answer those questions this analysis means absolutely nothing.
Yet it keeps being posted here as if it had some value.
Safe and effective. /s
They are trying to force it on the entire population, as quickly as they can, because that's the only way to find out if it kills people.
Where were these harmful batches administered? When there is some kind of contaminated food discovered, the location of its distribution is given nationwide attention.
Remember, they have total immunity .... they could have prepared the lots with dog piss and they still have immunity because at this late date there is no way to check ... because the FDA doesn’t!!!!!! In fact, Hadji could be running a Jihad on vaccine jihad on the unbelievers and nobody would be the wiser.
Remenber, when you take the jabs you agree to take part in the biggest human gene therapy test ever run.
Using the population as one vast experiment. Only possible with liability limitations.
“We got to inject them to find out what is in it”, because Mengele Nazi science, btch
those criticising should put together better data and publish it.
meanwhile -
6 Dec: Michael Smith News: Huge relief?
Tweet: 9News: “It’s a huge relief for a lot of parents”.
Children as young as 5 will be offered the Pfizer vaccine from early next year. #9Today - 5 Dec 2021...
https://www.michaelsmithnews.com/2021/12/huge-relief-.html
5 Dec updated 6 Dec: ABC Australia: COVID-19 vaccines have been provisionally approved in Australia for children aged five to 11. Here is what we know
by Tom Lowrey
It’s the latest significant expansion in the national vaccine rollout and may come as a relief to plenty of parents...
Moderna’s vaccine is also being considered for younger children, with a decision from the TGA expected in the next few weeks...
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-12-05/five-to-11-year-olds-covid-vaccination-rollout-explainer/100675364
4 Dec: Twitchy: Justin Trudeau says he knows kids are excited and eager to get the COVID vaccine as soon as they turn 5
by Brett T
https://twitchy.com/brettt-3136/2021/12/04/justin-trudeau-says-he-knows-kids-are-excited-and-eager-to-get-the-covid-vaccine-as-soon-as-they-turn-5/
This week is when the largest batch, no pun intended, of kids 5-11 who got their first dose will be getting their 2nd dose in time for “safe” travel to grandma’s for the holidays.
Merry Ximas.
Woo Woo EW0187 baby Yeah Yeah gasp Yeah that’s my gasp lot!
This is an important headline. I don’t know the data, but anyone who knows their job well and has ever had to rush through it knows that rushing through it will increase the likelihood of errors, mistakes, shoddy workmanship or bad batches, etc.
Interesting. Researchers who’ve analyzed the vaccines have found some odd results w/ respect to batch numbers. There was that Polish biochemist who analyzed several vials — three, I think — and found that two of them were nothing but saline solution. Then last week the head nurse at a major hospital in Ljubljana claimed that all batch numbers of one of the vaccines ended in 0, 1 or 2. One of them was saline, one contained the mRNA concoction, and one contained mRNA plus some other peculiar ingredient. As head nurse, she was called on to administer all shots given celebs and politicians (often on camera) and she was instructed to give them only the -0 vials, i.e., the harmless saline.
BULLSHIRT!
Isn’t it reported EVERYWHERE how UNDER reported cases are to VAERS? I think I’ve even seen as low as 1%. Even if it is 5-10%, what good are these stats?
A responsible reporting facility got the “bad” batches. Did all the non-reporting facilities get only “good batches?
I guess we don’t know that do we.
This report is so lacking of data on the other 95% (none) that conclusions from it are worthless.
This is trying to cover their asses. We didn’t put out a poison vaxxine on purpose, it was just a few “bad batches”.
Could be a reporting artifact too. Certain providers being more willing to use the reporting system, say 6% of the entities administering the vaccine (or more accurate, the entities that administer ANY 6% of the batches), would produce a similar result.
There have been reports that some people have been told to NOT report adverse events. That would cause some fraction of batches to run with few adverse event reports.
If the authorities were genuinely interested, they’d work toward more uniform reporting, or somehow qualify the data as having great uncertainty, etc.