Posted on 11/30/2021 9:51:09 AM PST by SeekAndFind
University of Oxford Professor Jim Naismith asserts that despite England dropping its mask mandate in July and Scotland keeping its rules in force, official data shows this “has made no meaningful difference” to infection rates.
Naismith goes on to argue that new face mask mandates imposed in England today are “unlikely to have much of an impact” in fighting off the spread of the Omicron variant.
Despite flatlining case numbers and declining deaths, partly achieved because England chose to lift lockdown restrictions in the summer unlike many European countries, mask mandates are once again back in force.
Face coverings are compulsory in shops, on public transport and numerous other venues arbitrarily chosen by the government.
Highlighting the absurdity of the rules, face masks are mandatory in takeaways but not restaurants, meaning you have to wear one if picking up a takeaway but not if you stay inside the restaurant for a sit down meal.
According to Naismith, Director of the Rosalind Franklin Institute and Professor of Structural Biology at the University of Oxford, masks are largely pointless.
“The ONS survey results on prevalence shows that the Scottish and English approach to masking, although formally different since July, has made no meaningful difference to Delta,” writes Naismith.
“In both countries very high levels of prevalence have continued for months. Thus the new changes announced are unlikely to have much of an impact if Omicron does indeed spread rapidly,” he added.
As the graph above illustrates, despite England dropping mask mandates and Scotland keeping them in place after July, infection rates were similar or indeed higher in Scotland.
ONS graphs also validate such assertions.
“You can see the ONS graphs below for yourself, and he’s right,” notes Will Jones.
“Yet the Government has re-imposed masks in schools, shops and on public transport, despite there being no evidence that they make any significant impact on the spread of disease.”
A comparison between case rates in Sweden (which never legally imposed face masks) and the rest of Europe is also very revealing.
Meanwhile, in Sweden... pic.twitter.com/AXbAeCz5jy — Paul Joseph Watson (@PrisonPlanet) November 11, 2021
Naismith’s verdict on face masks is backed up by UK government SAGE adviser Dr Colin Axon, who dismissed masks as “comfort blankets” that do virtually nothing, noting that the COVID-19 virus particle is up to 5,000 times smaller than the holes in the mask.
“The small sizes are not easily understood but an imperfect analogy would be to imagine marbles fired at builders’ scaffolding, some might hit a pole and rebound, but obviously most will fly through,” Axon said.
As the video below illustrates, public health officials like Dr. Hillary Jones (and even Dr. Fauci himself) originally were correct in saying that face masks were pointless.
However, as soon as they ‘got the memo’ that face masks were a tool of population control to keep people scared and compliant, their rhetoric on face coverings did a complete 180.
* * *
Now a double or triple ply? Now we’re talkin’. 😷🐂💨💩
“They reduce viral load...”
Viral load is a measure of the amount of virus INSIDE someone’s body, so it’s impossible for an externally worn mask to reduce that.
What a load of bull squat!
RE: Masks are not supposed to reduce the rate of infections. They reduce viral load and therefore tend to reduce severity of disease and deaths.
Can we say the same thing of the current Covid “vaccines” ( note the quotes )?
Because the pressure drop through the filter medium would be so high that air would no go through the medium, but around the leaks where it seals on your face. It’s a trade-off between air through the filter medium and the leakage.
In utility baghouses (used to capture coal flyash in the flue gas), the face velocity is measured in feet per MINUTE. The “face velocity” is the speed at which the gas passes through the filter fabric. The fabric itself does not do much of the filtration, either. It builds up a “filter cake” (filtered material deposited on the filter fabric) which itself does most of the filtration.
Human face masks have two serious strikes against them: 1) they do not have a filter cake and 2) they have a MUCH higher face velocity. Both of these lead to seriously degraded filtration efficiency.
Shhhhhhhhh!
We need the masks for the fearporn we’re broadcasting about it 24/7/365!!!!!
Its a visual prop, things are always taken seriously when you demand people wear masks...
It also lets us know how well we are controlling these dupes.
Way back when the control-freak charade started, Fauci stated that masks really didn’t do anything, they just make people feel better. March 2020
A lot of heavy duty maskers in my apartment building. I got all sorts of dirty looks for not wearing a mask, back in the heyday of idiots applauding dancing nurses at 7 PM every evening. But now I’ve noticed that even some of the hardcore maskers are taking off the mask.
I think that some of these people are keeping the mask on strictly because they don’t want me to see them take it off, because that would mean that I have won, since I’m not dead yet, and the COVID hysteria continues on indefinitely.
They are effective if someone is actually sneezing and coughing in blocking large droplets. But someone that sick wasn’t likely going out anyway...
Masks are political obedience flags and it makes little girls part of the club.
That was a contradictory load of crap.
Yes. That’s exactly what he said. And all mainstream news organizations also ran story after story saying the same thing.
Bookmark
Like having a screen door on a submarine.
Simon says wear a mask!
I presume you have scientific evidence of that?
Since our would-be GLOBALIST MASTERS failed to get the entire flock into the abattoir, they’ve introduced the (shudder) DREADED
OMICRON MONSTER. Let’s review!
https://www.bitchute.com/video/fcHTA7Uhw1hL/
If Dr. Redfield’s statements based on evidence would help, yes.
There is anecdotal evidence of same in countries which have masked historically also.
Lol. Good point.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.