Posted on 11/22/2021 1:50:47 PM PST by ransomnote
Last week, the Cardiology Advisor reported that according to a study presented at the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions 2021 the risk of developing acute coronary syndrome (“ACS”) significantly increased in patients after receiving mRNA Covid injections.
ACS covers a range of disorders, including a heart attack (myocardial infarction) and unstable angina, that are caused by the same underlying problem. The underlying problem is a sudden reduction of blood flow to part of the heart muscle. This is usually caused by a blood clot.
The study, published 8 November 2021, included 566 patients, aged 28 to 97 years, in a preventive cardiology practice. Participants included men and women in equal proportions. All participants have received a PULS Cardiac Test every 3-6 months for 8 years, including “post-vaccination.”
The PULS Cardiac Test measures multiple protein biomarkers and uses the results to calculate a 5-year risk score for new ACS. From pre-Covid injection to post-Covid injection the 5-year ACS PULS risk score increased from 11% to 25%.
The study author, Dr. Steven R Gundry who is best known for his work as a cardiothoracic surgeon and heart surgeon, concluded “that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.”
In early July, Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi made an easy-to-understand video explaining some, at the time recently published, studies of vaccine-induced immunity and its implication after the first and second doses of Covid injections. This video may help explain why the injections are having the effect shown in the recent study.
For the first 11 minutes Dr. Bhakdi explains the different parts of the immune response and natural immunity. Then, towards the end, he explains how the different parts of the immune system respond to the vaccine-induced spike protein lined blood vessels. The clip below is the section relating to the blood vessels. We highly recommend you watch his full 17-minute video which you can find HERE.
Oracle Films: “Proof That Puts an End to The Sars-Cov-2 Narrative” Professor Sucharit Bhakdi, M.D.,
9 July 2021 (6 mins)
Read more:
PING
Can’t acknowledge it until all the deplorables are dead.
Something new for Facebook and Google to suppress.
Dr Fubar can’t wait to test it on babies 🤪
Oh noooeeee… I’m gonna have Acute Coronary Syndrome!
I wonder how many people I know will drop dead from this. I had one J&J in March and was tested AGAIN the other night - no clots - normal EKG and one other test that I don’t know the name of. But still....not sure if I’m still at risk or not.
556 folks out of jow many millions?
also, no mention of ‘the other guys’ just moderna.
smells fishy.
I’ve had the 2 moderna shots, and with the tw(*)t running the cdc, and her 2 shots are none idiocy, im just cya and getting the booster.
and yup, my blood fouls the dialysis machine, at least once a week. but its better to foul the machine than to keep it inside me!
I have a friend whose husband got chest pains and severe nausea after a covid shot. I think it was in March. He recovered but now she’s saying he has an “enlarged” aorta. I don’t know if that’s the same thing as an aneurysm but he’s walking around like it’s not serious. Before that shot he was in good health, no issues at all, and had regular checkups.
This is a typically poor article.
Paragraphs 3-5 are good in spreading the information of the new study in Circulation.
That’s good and appreciated.
Here is the study’s abstract and link
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers. Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.This report summarizes those results. A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot. Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712
The DailyExpose is a good publication - good enough to reliably attract the same trolls.
***
“Oh noooeeee… I’m gonna have Acute Coronary Syndrome”!
You shouldn’t have gotten the jabs.
Is this a temporary risk increase or a long term risk increase.
I think we all knew that blood clots and heart attacks and mycarditis and periocarditis were all included in the risks of the vaccine. Rare but a risk. Those same risks occur if you get covid.
In other news, I drove by the cemetery the other day, and everyone there was dead.
If it follows the usual track record the site will post increasingly lurid exaggerations and lies to the point where Jim Robinson finally says, “Enough!” And thus cometh the ZOT.
There is no valid test for ‘Covid’. They deny all treatments to those with respiratory illnesses who test postive. Treatment reduces risk of hospitalization and death by 85% - that’s why the CDC/NIH/FDA/FAUCI/WALENSKY all pretend there are no treatments.
The risks of myocarditis and pericarditis for those having the “vaccine’ are intentionally minimized and dismissed. It’s not a rare risk and certainly not the same risk as if you get whatever collection of illnesses they have deemed ‘Covid’ via their fake test.
Seruzawa wrote: |
If it follows the usual track record the site will post increasingly lurid exaggerations and lies to the point where Jim Robinson finally says, “Enough!” And thus cometh the ZOT. |
This website publishes good information, better than the MSM (New York Times, CNN etc.) and that's why it reliably draws trolls out of the woodwork who denounce the publication and all who think the CDC and Wuhan Fauci may not be telling the truth.
Rah rah sis boom bah
Yay censorship!
Do you work for Facebook?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.