Posted on 11/20/2021 10:00:02 PM PST by SeekAndFind
Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS).
The score is based on changes from the norm of multiple protein biomarkers including IL-16, a proinflammatory cytokine, soluble Fas, an inducer of apoptosis, and Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF)which serves as a marker for chemotaxis of T-cells into epithelium and cardiac tissue, among other markers.
Elevation above the norm increases the PULS score, while decreases below the norm lowers the PULS score.The score has been measured every 3-6 months in our patient population for 8 years. Recently, with the advent of the mRNA COVID 19 vaccines (vac) by Moderna and Pfizer, dramatic changes in the PULS score became apparent in most patients.
This report summarizes those results.
A total of 566 pts, aged 28 to 97, M:F ratio 1:1 seen in a preventive cardiology practice had a new PULS test drawn from 2 to 10 weeks following the 2nd COVID shot and was compared to the previous PULS score drawn 3 to 5 months previously pre- shot.
Baseline IL-16 increased from 35=/-20 above the norm to 82 =/- 75 above the norm post-vac; sFas increased from 22+/- 15 above the norm to 46=/-24 above the norm post-vac; HGF increased from 42+/-12 above the norm to 86+/-31 above the norm post-vac. These changes resulted in an increase of the PULS score from 11% 5 yr ACS risk to 25% 5 yr ACS risk. At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac.
We conclude that the mRNA vacs dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.
Sounds like it might be permanent. Only time will tell now.
“Any suggestions about what can be done to lower the inflammation and other markers?”
Yeah - don’t get the jabs or endanger your kids with them...
All this data coming out and they still want to jab all the kids...
We are in a new Dark Ages - marked by economic, intellectual, and cultural decline.
And America has taken the place of the fallen “Holy Roman Empire” in the reenactment of a huge decline in society.
So, no problemo then.
That is a great summary!
I suspected that when I found no other papers referencing him or PULS, just a few obscure, scammy scammy “health clinics.”
Any other drug with these side effects would be pulled from the shelves by the FDA, or at least given a black box warning. Can you imagine what a 30 second commercial for that product would look like? They’d run out of time listing potential side effects.
—
I remember a commercial from many years back which was a prescription treatment for toenail fungus. At the end of the commercial, the announcer rattled thru the litany of side effects, among them ‘death’. In my book, ‘death’ is about as bad a side-effect as one could have to a drug, especially one with the only upside benefit being that it cures toenail fungus.
“He looks so peaceful.”
“And look at those toenails! So fungus-free.”
The last Paragraph is All
I needed to understand that
the Jab is Bad for People with Heart issues,
Thanks!
Rats Ain’t Stupid!
maybe..single historic PULS scores are used to predict future events. They took these particular PULS scores and plugged it into the predictor matrix. It may be that the accuracy of PULS score predictions are varied depending on the reason why the PULS score increases. I would believe that this type of information would have been generated in the five years or so that it normally takes to develop an acceptably safe vaccine.
Wow, such a helpful answer. I don’t know how I would have lived the rest of my life without that incredible wisdom.
Hey - when the question is asking to, “Any suggestions on how I can avoid the problems of taking arsenic?”, the response, “Don’t ingest arsenic.”, is a valid answer.
It’s really simple if one doesn’t insist on finding a way to take the poison and still remain healthy..
If the deed is already done, then yours was just a smart ass answer that was as helpful as tits on a chicken.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.