CDC Scientists admit they did manipulate study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women as researchers discover 91% of pregnancies resulted in miscarriage following Covid-19 Vaccination

TheExpose.uk ^ | NOVEMBER 7, 2021 | THE EXPOSÉ

[ransomnote]

In July 2021, The Exposé exclusively revealed how data had been manipulated by scientists carrying out a real world study for the CDC to show that Covid-19 vaccines were safe for use during pregnancy.

The authors claimed that the number of people to suffer a spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) during the study was 104 out of 827 completed pregnancies, equating the risk of miscarriage at 12.6%; 7 – 12% lower than the risk of miscarriage in the general population.

Source

However, our analysis proved that these numbers were extremely misleading due to the fact that of the 827 completed pregnancies, 700 / 86% of the women had received a dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the third trimester of pregnancy, meaning it was impossible for them to suffer a miscarriage due to the fact they can only occur prior to week 20 of a pregnancy.

This meant that just 127 women received either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the first / second trimester, with 104 of the woman sadly losing their baby.

Therefore the rate of incidence of miscarriage was 82%, not 12.6% as presented in the findings of the study, and the authors of the study have since admitted that they made a mistake, issuing a correction six months too late, because the study has been used to justify Covid-19 vaccination of pregnant women and new mothers around the world.

Source

But now two researchers from New Zealand have re-analysed the study and called for countries to halt the administration of Covid-19 vaccines to pregnant and breastfeeding women immediately due to extremely concerning findings.

The correction resolved some of the issues, but there are still more, according to Dr. Simon Thornley, a senior lecturer in the University of Auckland’s Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Dr. Aleisha Brock, another researcher in New Zealand.

According to Dr Thronley “The article’s conclusions haven’t changed substantially as we believe is warranted from our re-analysis of the association related to early exposure to the vaccine in pregnancy, which indicates a substantially increased risk from background.”

Thornley and Brock re-analysed the data and calculated the incidence of miscarriages in the first trimester was actually 82 percent (as concluded previously by The Exposé) to 91 percent in a paper (see here) published in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law.

Source

Of the 827 pregnancies reported through the V-Safe registry, operated by the CDC, 712 resulted in a live birth. Nearly all of them were among women who were vaccinated in the third trimester. Of the other pregnancies, 104 resulted in miscarriage. Most of those occurred before 13 weeks of gestation.

Using data from the study and several estimates, the New Zealand researchers calculated that spontaneous abortions occurred in 81.9 percent to 91.2 percent of the women who were vaccinated before 20 weeks of gestation.

Thornley and Brock conclude in their analysis that they ‘question the conclusions of the Shimabukuro et al. study to support the use of the mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy, which has now been hastily incorporated into many international guidelines for vaccine use, including in New Zealand.’

‘The assumption that exposure in the third trimester cohort is representative of the effect of exposure throughout pregnancy is questionable and ignores past experience with drugs such as thalidomide. Evidence of safety of the product when used in the first and second trimesters cannot be established until these cohorts have been followed to at least the perinatal period or long-term safety determined for any of the babies born to mothers inoculated during pregnancy,” they added.

Pfizer, it was noted, says on its vaccine’s label that the available data on the vaccine “administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy.”

The CDC researchers concluded their findings didn’t show any obvious safety signals among pregnant women who received the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. They said their findings did not necessarily represent the position of the CDC, but the agency links to the study on its website and used it to promote vaccination in pregnant women.

Dr Brock and Dr Thornley strongly disagree and state that considering the evidence presented in their analysis, that they suggest the ‘immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy (Category X)[41] and those breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines to children or those of child-bearing age in the general population, until more convincing data relating to the safety and long-term impacts on fertility, pregnancy and reproduction are established in these groups.’

As per the latest MHRA Yellow Card data which includes reports of adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines (estimated between 1 – 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported) submitted up to October 28th 2021, a total of 623 women have reported suffering a miscarriage as an adverse reaction to a Covid-19 injection.

This includes 369 reports made against the Pfizer mRNA injection.

Source – Page 73

Two-hundred-and-fifteen reports made against the AstraZeneca viral vector injection.

Source – Page 90

Thirty-seven against the Moderna mRNA injection.

Source – Page 35

And 2 where the brand of Covid-19 vaccine was no specified in the report.

Source – Page 26

The question is, how many of these spontaneous abortions were suffered following the use of a study in which CDC scientists manipulated the data to justify the safety of administering a Covid-19 vaccine during pregnancy?

[Aria]

Our bodies continue to manufacture this poison??? We’ll never be free of it?

[TigersEye]

DemonRats just consider this a plus. Now Covid vaxxes are an abortifacient too!

At a 91% miscarriage rate it works better for that than for preventing SARS-CoV-2. :(

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Except it is not.

Unless you are working in the miscarriages that are basically considered unknown in the first eight weeks.

After 12 weeks your chance of miscarriage is 2.5%.

Since these were women who knew they were pregnant you have to assume they were at least four to six weeks at least otherwise you usually do not know you are pregnant unless you are testing very frequently.

[kiryandil]

“Baby’s first myocarditis” - freeper Flick Lives

[mvonfr]

continue, this is the idea : RNA in the vaccine programs your body to manufacture spike protein.

but for how long is not entirely clear! I’d think that at some point introduced RNA dies out.

[ransomnote]

We haven’t even touched on birth defects yet.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There was a gory still birth, with horrific ‘problems’ with the head and brain. The baby did not survive. Because the CDC/NIH etc. keep saying the ‘vaccines’ are safe, get the vax, the obstetrician could not conceive of the ‘vax’ being the cause of this never-seen-it-before horrific ‘defect’ so he ruled out the vax as the cause and instead called it a ‘birth defect’, and the family didn’t want the birth mother to blame herself for getting the vax, so they don’t want an autopsy.

[Pajamajan]

When does it become criminal?

[ransomnote]

When does it become criminal?
~~
That ship has sailed....

[PubliusMM]

From DAY 1 of this scamdemic, these a$$clowns have falsified, twisted, and manufactured the ‘data’ that they’ve use to hoodwoink a huge portion of the population.

At this point, there is NO REASON to believe ANYTHING they say. Their credibility is NIL.

And, still folks condemn the others who are vax skeptical.

The rush to ‘vaccine’ at the outset of this criminal enterprise, with NO focus on therapeutics or other treatments should have been the first clue that something ain’t quite right, here.
But still the PTB were preaching to the Sheeple and their mantra was VAX VAX VAX.
Now, it appears the vax ain’t got legs and you will need annual or semi-annual, or even quarterly ‘booster’ shots...for a virus with a less than one percent mortality rate.

Stop the madness!!

[beethovenfan]

I refuse to believe anything the CDC (Center for Democrat Control) says.

[Oscar in Batangas]

Virtually every clinical trial that I reviewed for approval had a condition that excluded pregnant or breastfeeding females from the study.
Some went so far as to advise participants against getting pregnant during the study or even up to six months after the study.

I guess the “science” has changed?

[hecticskeptic]

“CDC Scientists admit they did manipulate study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Manipulate? Errors? Misleading? Mistake? Issuing a correction?

I found all these words in the article… so what was it? Was it deliberate or was it accidental? If deliberate, why was it done? Whose heads are going to roll?

The further issue is this… If the EGT caused all the miscarriages, what harm will this do to the babies? I can’t imagine that a substance that is so harmful to causes miscarriages, won’t also leave a huge impact on the babies….. both then they are young and later as adults.

This is so horrific that the media should be on to this 24/7. Instead, we get nothing from them.

[scrabblehack]

Quite the opposite - they’re saying it’s safe.
When the vax was first released there was a disclaimer saying “unknown effect” or some such - I don’t know if that has been removed.

[liberalh8ter]

Lawsuit isn't enough…this is no different than the doctor who gave his pregnant girlfriend the abortifacient. This is manslaughter.

[David Chase]

from Imgflip Meme Generator

[iceskater]

I stopped believing the CDC during the 0bama admin when that moron, Tom Friedman, was in charge during the whole ebola mess.

I do not understand why doctors are encouraging pregnant women to get jabbed. My state senator is an OB/GYN and she is insisting that ALL of her pregnant patients get shot. It boggles my mind. It’s malpractice, IMHO.

Frankly, I don’t understand why anyone of childbearing age gets the jab. I will not be surprised to see too many sterile young people and too much pregnancy loss in the next 18 months or so.

Horrifying.

[griswold3]

The level of malfeasance and malicious conduct exposed will force those in charge to only double their efforts. The stakes are now too high.

[TianaHighrider]

Not only criminal, but pure evil.

[greeneyes]

My first question is is this a trustworthy news source?

If this is true, heads should role.
***************************************************************************************
I can’t say about the source, but it is basically true. The actual study was posted here some time back and we discussed it on that thread.

It was noted that the incidence prior to the third trimester was about 80%. However a great many recipients in the study were not accounted for and it didn’t say why.

Also the study noted that additional data was needed, especially for the women that were in early stages of their pregnancy.

So they threw enough weasel words in there to shield them from any blow back. They’ll likely excuse it as “failure to be clear” - not a deliberate concealment.