Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CDC Scientists admit they did manipulate study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women as researchers discover 91% of pregnancies resulted in miscarriage following Covid-19 Vaccination
TheExpose.uk ^ | NOVEMBER 7, 2021 | THE EXPOSÉ

Posted on 11/07/2021 2:25:58 PM PST by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: mvonfr

Our bodies continue to manufacture this poison??? We’ll never be free of it?


42 posted on 11/07/2021 3:26:29 PM PST by Aria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

DemonRats just consider this a plus. Now Covid vaxxes are an abortifacient too!

At a 91% miscarriage rate it works better for that than for preventing SARS-CoV-2. :(


43 posted on 11/07/2021 3:30:34 PM PST by TigersEye (Resistance is not futile!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Except it is not.

Unless you are working in the miscarriages that are basically considered unknown in the first eight weeks.

After 12 weeks your chance of miscarriage is 2.5%.

Since these were women who knew they were pregnant you have to assume they were at least four to six weeks at least otherwise you usually do not know you are pregnant unless you are testing very frequently.

44 posted on 11/07/2021 3:31:16 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (add a dab of lavender in milk, leave town with an orange and pretend you're laughing with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: gitmo; Flick Lives

“Baby’s first myocarditis” - freeper Flick Lives


45 posted on 11/07/2021 3:32:49 PM PST by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Aria

continue, this is the idea : RNA in the vaccine programs your body to manufacture spike protein.

but for how long is not entirely clear! I’d think that at some point introduced RNA dies out.


46 posted on 11/07/2021 3:36:28 PM PST by mvonfr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: blackdog

We haven’t even touched on birth defects yet.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There was a gory still birth, with horrific ‘problems’ with the head and brain. The baby did not survive. Because the CDC/NIH etc. keep saying the ‘vaccines’ are safe, get the vax, the obstetrician could not conceive of the ‘vax’ being the cause of this never-seen-it-before horrific ‘defect’ so he ruled out the vax as the cause and instead called it a ‘birth defect’, and the family didn’t want the birth mother to blame herself for getting the vax, so they don’t want an autopsy.


47 posted on 11/07/2021 3:39:12 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

When does it become criminal?


48 posted on 11/07/2021 3:39:37 PM PST by Pajamajan ( PRAY FOR OUR NATION. NEVER be a peaceful quiet slave in a new socialist America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pajamajan

When does it become criminal?
~~
That ship has sailed....


49 posted on 11/07/2021 3:40:58 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

From DAY 1 of this scamdemic, these a$$clowns have falsified, twisted, and manufactured the ‘data’ that they’ve use to hoodwoink a huge portion of the population.

At this point, there is NO REASON to believe ANYTHING they say. Their credibility is NIL.

And, still folks condemn the others who are vax skeptical.

The rush to ‘vaccine’ at the outset of this criminal enterprise, with NO focus on therapeutics or other treatments should have been the first clue that something ain’t quite right, here.
But still the PTB were preaching to the Sheeple and their mantra was VAX VAX VAX.
Now, it appears the vax ain’t got legs and you will need annual or semi-annual, or even quarterly ‘booster’ shots...for a virus with a less than one percent mortality rate.

Stop the madness!!


50 posted on 11/07/2021 3:42:21 PM PST by PubliusMM (RKBA; a matter of fact, not opinion. The Dhimmicraps are ALL Traitors. All of them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I refuse to believe anything the CDC (Center for Democrat Control) says.


51 posted on 11/07/2021 3:50:12 PM PST by beethovenfan (Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Virtually every clinical trial that I reviewed for approval had a condition that excluded pregnant or breastfeeding females from the study.
Some went so far as to advise participants against getting pregnant during the study or even up to six months after the study.

I guess the “science” has changed?


52 posted on 11/07/2021 3:54:35 PM PST by Oscar in Batangas (An Honors Graduate from the Don Rickles School of Personal Verbal Intercourse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

“CDC Scientists admit they did manipulate study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women…
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Manipulate? Errors? Misleading? Mistake? Issuing a correction?

I found all these words in the article… so what was it? Was it deliberate or was it accidental? If deliberate, why was it done? Whose heads are going to roll?

The further issue is this… If the EGT caused all the miscarriages, what harm will this do to the babies? I can’t imagine that a substance that is so harmful to causes miscarriages, won’t also leave a huge impact on the babies….. both then they are young and later as adults.

This is so horrific that the media should be on to this 24/7. Instead, we get nothing from them.


53 posted on 11/07/2021 4:15:25 PM PST by hecticskeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hecticskeptic

Quite the opposite - they’re saying it’s safe.
When the vax was first released there was a disclaimer saying “unknown effect” or some such - I don’t know if that has been removed.


54 posted on 11/07/2021 4:18:46 PM PST by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: blueyon
Lawsuit isn't enough…this is no different than the doctor who gave his pregnant girlfriend the abortifacient. This is manslaughter.
55 posted on 11/07/2021 4:28:02 PM PST by liberalh8ter (The only difference between flash mob 'urban yutes' and U.S. politicians is the hoodies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
from Imgflip Meme Generator

56 posted on 11/07/2021 4:30:15 PM PST by David Chase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I stopped believing the CDC during the 0bama admin when that moron, Tom Friedman, was in charge during the whole ebola mess.

I do not understand why doctors are encouraging pregnant women to get jabbed. My state senator is an OB/GYN and she is insisting that ALL of her pregnant patients get shot. It boggles my mind. It’s malpractice, IMHO.

Frankly, I don’t understand why anyone of childbearing age gets the jab. I will not be surprised to see too many sterile young people and too much pregnancy loss in the next 18 months or so.

Horrifying.


57 posted on 11/07/2021 4:31:58 PM PST by iceskater (I'm in the control group. ;))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

The level of malfeasance and malicious conduct exposed will force those in charge to only double their efforts. The stakes are now too high.


58 posted on 11/07/2021 4:34:04 PM PST by griswold3 (When chaos serves the State, the State will encourage chaos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Not only criminal, but pure evil.


59 posted on 11/07/2021 4:34:11 PM PST by TianaHighrider (God bless President Trump. Prayers for PDJT and his loyal supporters.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mark was here

My first question is is this a trustworthy news source?

If this is true, heads should role.
***************************************************************************************
I can’t say about the source, but it is basically true. The actual study was posted here some time back and we discussed it on that thread.

It was noted that the incidence prior to the third trimester was about 80%. However a great many recipients in the study were not accounted for and it didn’t say why.

Also the study noted that additional data was needed, especially for the women that were in early stages of their pregnancy.

So they threw enough weasel words in there to shield them from any blow back. They’ll likely excuse it as “failure to be clear” - not a deliberate concealment.


60 posted on 11/07/2021 4:35:15 PM PST by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-88 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson