CDC Scientists admit they did manipulate study data to show the Covid-19 Vaccines are safe for Pregnant Women as researchers discover 91% of pregnancies resulted in miscarriage following Covid-19 Vaccination

TheExpose.uk ^ | NOVEMBER 7, 2021 | THE EXPOSÉ

[ransomnote]

In July 2021, The Exposé exclusively revealed how data had been manipulated by scientists carrying out a real world study for the CDC to show that Covid-19 vaccines were safe for use during pregnancy.

The authors claimed that the number of people to suffer a spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) during the study was 104 out of 827 completed pregnancies, equating the risk of miscarriage at 12.6%; 7 – 12% lower than the risk of miscarriage in the general population.

Source

However, our analysis proved that these numbers were extremely misleading due to the fact that of the 827 completed pregnancies, 700 / 86% of the women had received a dose of either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the third trimester of pregnancy, meaning it was impossible for them to suffer a miscarriage due to the fact they can only occur prior to week 20 of a pregnancy.

This meant that just 127 women received either the Pfizer or Moderna Covid-19 vaccine during the first / second trimester, with 104 of the woman sadly losing their baby.

Therefore the rate of incidence of miscarriage was 82%, not 12.6% as presented in the findings of the study, and the authors of the study have since admitted that they made a mistake, issuing a correction six months too late, because the study has been used to justify Covid-19 vaccination of pregnant women and new mothers around the world.

Source

But now two researchers from New Zealand have re-analysed the study and called for countries to halt the administration of Covid-19 vaccines to pregnant and breastfeeding women immediately due to extremely concerning findings.

The correction resolved some of the issues, but there are still more, according to Dr. Simon Thornley, a senior lecturer in the University of Auckland’s Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, and Dr. Aleisha Brock, another researcher in New Zealand.

According to Dr Thronley “The article’s conclusions haven’t changed substantially as we believe is warranted from our re-analysis of the association related to early exposure to the vaccine in pregnancy, which indicates a substantially increased risk from background.”

Thornley and Brock re-analysed the data and calculated the incidence of miscarriages in the first trimester was actually 82 percent (as concluded previously by The Exposé) to 91 percent in a paper (see here) published in Science, Public Health Policy, and the Law.

Source

Of the 827 pregnancies reported through the V-Safe registry, operated by the CDC, 712 resulted in a live birth. Nearly all of them were among women who were vaccinated in the third trimester. Of the other pregnancies, 104 resulted in miscarriage. Most of those occurred before 13 weeks of gestation.

Using data from the study and several estimates, the New Zealand researchers calculated that spontaneous abortions occurred in 81.9 percent to 91.2 percent of the women who were vaccinated before 20 weeks of gestation.

Thornley and Brock conclude in their analysis that they ‘question the conclusions of the Shimabukuro et al. study to support the use of the mRNA vaccine in early pregnancy, which has now been hastily incorporated into many international guidelines for vaccine use, including in New Zealand.’

‘The assumption that exposure in the third trimester cohort is representative of the effect of exposure throughout pregnancy is questionable and ignores past experience with drugs such as thalidomide. Evidence of safety of the product when used in the first and second trimesters cannot be established until these cohorts have been followed to at least the perinatal period or long-term safety determined for any of the babies born to mothers inoculated during pregnancy,” they added.

Pfizer, it was noted, says on its vaccine’s label that the available data on the vaccine “administered to pregnant women are insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy.”

The CDC researchers concluded their findings didn’t show any obvious safety signals among pregnant women who received the Pfizer or Moderna vaccines. They said their findings did not necessarily represent the position of the CDC, but the agency links to the study on its website and used it to promote vaccination in pregnant women.

Dr Brock and Dr Thornley strongly disagree and state that considering the evidence presented in their analysis, that they suggest the ‘immediate withdrawal of mRNA vaccine use in pregnancy (Category X)[41] and those breastfeeding, alongside the withdrawal of mRNA vaccines to children or those of child-bearing age in the general population, until more convincing data relating to the safety and long-term impacts on fertility, pregnancy and reproduction are established in these groups.’

As per the latest MHRA Yellow Card data which includes reports of adverse reactions to the Covid-19 vaccines (estimated between 1 – 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported) submitted up to October 28th 2021, a total of 623 women have reported suffering a miscarriage as an adverse reaction to a Covid-19 injection.

This includes 369 reports made against the Pfizer mRNA injection.

Source – Page 73

Two-hundred-and-fifteen reports made against the AstraZeneca viral vector injection.

Source – Page 90

Thirty-seven against the Moderna mRNA injection.

Source – Page 35

And 2 where the brand of Covid-19 vaccine was no specified in the report.

Source – Page 26

The question is, how many of these spontaneous abortions were suffered following the use of a study in which CDC scientists manipulated the data to justify the safety of administering a Covid-19 vaccine during pregnancy?

[gitmo]

I may seem dimwitted because I am not going to absorb all this data. I will just say I’m tired of being lied to, tired of being mislead by CDC who can’t find their way out of a bag, and Fauci, who is ‘all glorious’. This ‘all things Covid’ worship has to stop.

I distinctly remember getting out of bed one morning early this year and the first thought in my mind is I would no longer believe anything my government or the media says without solid collaboration.

It wasn’t like that in the previous administration.

[Harmless Teddy Bear]

Good grief.

Even 12% is way to high.

Back when we were trying for children I was told to go off any medication unless it was necessary for life, limb or eyesight.

Vaccinations were completely off the table during pregnancy.

Too much chance of something going wrong.

I asked my doctor what he would recommend if there was an epidemic and he said bluntly, "Quarantine."

[mvonfr]

What is missing here:

The poison stays in the body.

How long will it continue acting as a contraceptive? Days, weeks, months, years?

I'm guessing some women would like to know ?

[gitmo]

I’ve known several women who, to my horror, got vaccinated while pregnant. Thank God, none of them miscarried or had babies with birth defects.

[Jim Noble]

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2114466

19 000 pregnancies in Norway studied February - August 2021 approximately 5% early pregnancy loss both vaxx and no vaxx, no significant differences between groups.

Published October 2021..

[New Perspective]

They may have high IQ’s but the lack basic common sense and ethics, which you can not learn or buy.

[Aria]

My sister, against my strong objections, got her 12 yr old daughter one Pfizer shot. Not sure about a 2nd. I wonder if the daughter will ever have a normal pregnancy some day - not to mention worrying about the long term effects on her own life.

[CatOwner]

Little consolation for the lives they are destroying and even killing while we’re on this Earth. I take no comfort in believing they will be dealt with in the next life.

[Geoffrey]

“My first question is is this a trustworthy news source?”

2nd this. I have seen a lot of questionable articles from this source...for example that declining immune study.

I have no doubt the shots are bad for pregnant women, my dil, a surgeon is pregnant and not getting them which is what I base my decision on.

I won’t get the shots either, but that is based on understanding the history of medicine in the US and the lethality of this common cold variant. My decision...if you feel you need the shots then go for it.

[PghBaldy]

I too wonder about this source. Not that I would be shocked if the CDC were found to be lying once again... It just seems that this source appeared our of nowhere recently.

[A Formerly Proud Canadian]

Ping

[blackdog]

Jail is too good for these sociopaths in office.

[cgbg]

The long term side effects of the vaccines could be a ticking time bomb in their children....

The CDC is harmful to children and other living things.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

qwerty1234 has an auto-reply of “debunked” for any data that doesn’t fit his devout Branch Covidian religion that says all Big Pharma products are “safe and effective.”

Isn’t that right, Comrade qwerty1234?

[ransomnote]

Good grief.

Even 12% is way to high.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Notice this part though, it says 12% is below the risk of miscarriage in the general population. Miscarriage is defined as 'prior to 20 weeks'.

"The authors claimed that the number of people to suffer a spontaneous abortion (miscarriage) during the study was 104 out of 827 completed pregnancies, equating the risk of miscarriage at 12.6%; 7 – 12% lower than the risk of miscarriage in the general population."

Early pregnancies are often lost, so this article's 91% value for vaccinated pregnancies lost before week 20 should be compared with 19 - 24% early pregnancies lost 'normally' for the general population.

[BusterDog]

“2nd this. I have seen a lot of questionable articles from this source...for example that declining immune study.”

*****

#Metoo, but The Expose this time is accurately referencing the study, which says:

“However, closer inspection of the 827 women in
the denominator of this calculation reveals that
between 700 to 713 women were exposed to the
vaccine after the timeframe for recording the
outcome had elapsed (up to 20 weeks of
pregnancy). Hence, a re-analysis of these figures
indicates a cumulative incidence of spontaneous
abortion ranging from 82% (104/127) to 91%
(104/114), 7–8 times higher than the original
authors’ results.”

Study found here:
https://cf5e727d-d02d-4d71-89ff-9fe2d3ad957f.filesusr.com/ugd/adf864_2bd97450072f4364a65e5cf1d7384dd4.pdf

[blackdog]

I think the Beagles got a better deal than the people. These people behind this need to be in jail as I am following the science and not the sales job.

[blackdog]

We haven’t even touched on birth defects yet.

[hoe_cake]

‘It wasn’t like that in the previous administration.;

Agreed. The Benghazi incident turned me against the Administration. I was comfortable when Trump was in office. But now I know how underhanded, conniving, and mean an Administration can be.

[mvonfr]

This really does not look good, especially that unlike traditional vaccines, manufacturing continues in your own body.

Hiding this effect was criminal -- on the part of the involved individuals -- but not stopping this now is criminal on the part of CDC and the regime.