Skip to comments.
You Won't Believe What They Admitted on the News in 1971... [Transcript and images, link to 7 minute video, in the 70's CDC's was pushing ineffective, toxic 'vaccines']
youtube.com ^
| May 31, 2017
| Truthstream Media
Posted on 10/31/2021 2:45:51 AM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Ymani Cricket]
ransomnote: This 7 minute video containes examples from 1971 in which government officials admit the flu vaccine doesn't work and may be harmful at higher levels, or the adeno virus given soldiers contains a cancer causing agent which they have just happened to find in previous 'vaccines'.
It's all there - normalizing toxic vaccines and after making statements that they don't work or contain cancer causing agents, they assure the public that vaccines are good and we should be vaccinated. The vaccines may cause cancer and the flu vaccines are not effective, lessons learned etc. just get the vaccine anyway.
You Won't Believe What They Admitted on the News in 1971... - YouTube
Computer generated transcript - lacks punctuation and may contain phonetic errors.
we dug up this clip Melissa found this
clip online somewhere I could not
believe it this is a sensational
ridiculous repugnant clip because they
just say these things with a straight
face with no reaction and then they
balance them out with just equal time of
regurgitated propaganda about how great
vaccines are how good the government is
and how much they're trying to protect
you and especially children today
doctors at the federal communicable
disease Center acknowledge the flu
vaccine and the recommended dosage is
ineffective while in a larger dose that
however the flu vaccine is still
recommended for old people um acquatic
we're right here they just admit that
the government continues to push and
propagate vaccines tell you you have to
take them you should take them you're a
bad person if you don't even though they
admit that these vaccines are
ineffective they admit that they
suppress reports from scientists who
found that they were ineffective they
wouldn't publish these studies for over
last month a Senate subcommittee headed
by Abraham Ribicoff charged that the
federal government wasn't doing a good
enough job of informing the public about
ineffective vaccines scientists at the
division of biologic standards test
vaccines for their potency and safety
before licensing them for public use
however the division does not determine
the effectiveness of the vaccine that is
left to the manufacturers a case in
point is the influenza vaccine for
scientists in charge of work on the flu
vaccine during the 1960's found it to be
ineffective said they refused to give it
to their own families two were
transferred to other work a third left
the division and over the entire ten
year period not one word of their
unfavorable findings was allowed to be
published and worse they admit that they
continued to administer the vaccines
even when they knew they had a cancer
agent containment in them but a more
serious case involving the relationship
between the leaders of the division and
their scientists involves the adenovirus
vaccine a vaccine given to thousands of
American soldiers to prevent certain
cold like symptoms when it was shown
that the vaccine contained a contaminant
which caused cancer in laboratory
it was taken off the market did you hear
that let's play it again but the vaccine
contained a contaminant which caused
cancer if you hear that they admitted
that these vaccines have a
cancer-causing agent they knew about it
and the government sat on this
information but that was three years
after the divisions own scientist had
pointed out the danger dr. Murray
justifies the use of the vaccine by
saying it took three years to examine
the evidence against it because more
importantly the vaccines and the taken
off the market and remove the agent and
they were still administering it to the
soldiers in saying it was just more
important to give out the vaccines then
to not vaccinate is more important to
you the vaccines and to take them off
the market and in remove the agent and
since agent couldn't be removed there
was no other course still administering
it to the soldiers bus for three years
American troops were injected with a
cold preventing vaccine which was
causing cancer and laboratory animals
and the most incredible part did they
find about it just now in this 1971 TV
clip no these newspaper articles show
that they knew about this at least in
1965 that's how long it took them to
tell the public and how long it took
them to get it out of vaccines and
that's how long it went on for and right
the microbiologist who is actually a nun
in an article that says nothing to worry
about there's no connection here admits
that the agent inside of the adenovirus
has been found to be cancer-causing and
animals and more so that it's worse it
creates kind of a more deadly
combination when it's combined with a
certain other agent which just so
happens to be sv40 the exact
cancer-causing agent that was
accidentally found in previous vaccines
that were administered to millions of
millions of people in the polio vaccine
and the largest-ever government push to
have a population vaccinated and they
found this stuff they knew this stuff
was in there just imagine what happens
for anyone who got a tainted batch of
this adeno vaccine as well as a tainted
batch of the polio vaccine containing SB
40 if this article is correct anyone who
got both vaccines would theoretically
much higher risk for getting cancer
because then the animal studies of his
found that it was definitely worse when
both of these were present and the media
just casually reports this it's clear
what the government's opinion is and
they just round out the piece with a
brief pause a note that well things
could be done better there's lessons to
be learned by a serious question about
public health policy or not but keep
vaccinating this is the most important
thing vaccinate vaccinations on all
that's population such as if I smell an
elementary school is one of the public
health services most effective checks
against communicable disease well it's
cause for concern but now we have to
give equal time a propaganda to a
regurgitation of the fact that
vaccinations great it's wiping out
disease and these kids should line up
and take their vaccine and they just say
this with a calm face they admit that
they ignored evidence that could be
linked to people getting cancer they
know that there must be a risk instead
of pulling the vaccine and studying to
eliminate the possibility of risk they
just kept giving it to people well the
risk hasn't been shown yet are you
kidding me yeah I can't even believe
that they just said these two things
together in one clip barely taking a
breath even though there's risks just
keep vaccinating it's worth it because
maybe because vaccines it's a total
logical fallacy the answer to everything
is because vaccines despite the risk
because vaccines it makes no sense but
they're shoving it down everyone's
throat they knew but continued to
administer the vaccines so we know that
all the vaccine scientists who found
problems who were anywhere from mildly
concerned to sow concern they refused to
give it to their own children and family
anyone who found problems were
suppressed were run out of their
departments some of the division
scientists who charge they were
prevented from publishing results of
experiments which so some of the
vaccines to be ineffective the control
officer in in 1960 who has grave doubts
about the potency of influenza vaccine
these doubts were made known to the
director of the division and through the
proper channels and somewhat subsequent
to that time within a year or so that
person was transferred to other duties
what happened they stopped scientists
from reporting the unfavorable findings
covered it up continued to administer
the vaccines and then only way later
warn the public just to tell them no big
deal it's all in the testing influenza
vaccine the people are working in their
communities and under pressure at an
investor's course eternal stress because
more important to use the vaccine and to
take them off the market and remove the
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 1970s; cancer; cdc; media; qtardwonderland; vaccine; virus
To: ransomnote
Bookmark....need more coffee before reading.
Thanks.
2
posted on
10/31/2021 2:51:09 AM PDT
by
ptsal
(Vote R.E.D. >>>Remove Every Democrat ***)
To: ransomnote
Video at 3:30 plus
halftruth: adenoviruses cause cancer
real truth: “Adenovirus 12 (Ad12) (Huie) (highly oncogenic group A) readily induces tumors in newborn rodents. Since Ad12 is isolated from human fecal samples, we investigated whether it plays a role in the etiology of human gastrointestinal cancer. If Ad12 is a causal agent of human cancer, then human tumors should contain Ad12 transforming genes...Our date are strong evidence that Ad12 is not a major cause of human gastrointestinal cancer. No viral DNA sequences were detected in 12 normal lungs and 22 lung tumors, suggesting that respiratory cancer does not involve an Ad12 etiology.
Dec 1976
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1070016/
Gene therapy with viral vectors has significantly advanced in the past few decades, with adenovirus being one of the most commonly employed vectors for cancer gene therapy.
May 2020
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32455560/
Untruth: SV40 caused cancer
Real Truth:
SV40 was present in cancers of people who either had or had not received the polio vaccines that were contaminated with SV40.
SV40 has not been present in any vaccine since 1963.
People with cancers who were born after 1963, when SV40 was no longer a contaminant of the polio vaccine, were found to have evidence for SV40 in their cancerous cells.
Epidemiologic studies do not show an increased risk of cancers in those who received polio vaccine between 1955 and 1963.
Taken together, these findings do not support the hypothesis that SV40 virus contained in polio vaccines administered before 1963 caused cancers.
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
https://www.chop.edu/centers-programs/vaccine-education-center/vaccine-ingredients/sv40
digging pretty deep if we’re going back to conspiracy theories of the 70s
3
posted on
10/31/2021 3:14:42 AM PDT
by
blueplum
("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
To: ransomnote
To: blueplum
You don’t have to regurgitate everything the MSM says to protect the CDC and the narrative. It’s disappointing to have you functioning as FR’s version of SNOPES but that’s what you’re determined to do.
5
posted on
10/31/2021 3:19:34 AM PDT
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: ransomnote
Take a look at who was president, and gearing up for re-election, in ‘71.
To: blueplum
You entirely miss the point. Seeking to debunk news from the 70s is worse than accusing someone of digging for a conspiracy. Quite entertaining actually lol
7
posted on
10/31/2021 3:30:18 AM PDT
by
Ymani Cricket
( "Pressure Makes Diamonds" ~General Patton)
To: ransomnote
8
posted on
10/31/2021 5:53:14 AM PDT
by
SisterK
(recognize and resist tyranny)
To: ransomnote
Anyone who goes digging into YouTube back to the early 1970s looking for anti-vaccine material is certainly an anti-vaxxer despite claiming otherwise.
9
posted on
10/31/2021 6:12:05 AM PDT
by
DugwayDuke
(Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
To: ransomnote
Wow. Another big bookmark here. Just getting coffee here too, laf.
10
posted on
10/31/2021 6:17:30 AM PDT
by
TianaHighrider
(God bless President Trump. Prayers for PDJT and his loyal supporters.)
To: DugwayDuke
DugwayDuke wrote: |
Anyone who goes digging into YouTube back to the early 1970s looking for anti-vaccine material is certainly an anti-vaxxer despite claiming otherwise. |
Anyone who has to lie and say I went digging for old videos is likely a paid shill. I can't see anyone else taking an interest in the video link I saw posted on another thread last night and then using it to make up a story about me.
11
posted on
10/31/2021 6:22:38 AM PDT
by
ransomnote
(IN GOD WE TRUST)
To: ransomnote
ransomnote wrote: “Anyone who has to lie and say I went digging for old videos is likely a paid shill. I can’t see anyone else taking an interest in the video link I saw posted on another thread last night and then using it to make up a story about me.”
So, this old video just kinda showed up on your desktop? You haven’t a clue how it got there?
Go ahead and admit it, you’re an anti-vaxxer from top to bottom. Such an admission would help your credibility.
12
posted on
10/31/2021 6:54:48 AM PDT
by
DugwayDuke
(Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
To: ransomnote
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson