|
Posted on 09/19/2021 4:52:43 AM PDT by ransomnote
6:33 AM · Sep 17, 2021·Twitter for iPhoneQ is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
A little long, even when excerpted, but author makes some excellent points about the fraud, Fauci. Especially shows the same patterns by the fraud in dealing with AIDS, Ebola and Covid.
********
Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy…on a societal scale?
https://kirstenmortensen.com/munchausen-syndrome-by-proxy-on-a-societal-scale/
Excerpt:
What if leading healthcare “experts” are psychologically motivated to generate widespread suffering?
If you’ve ever heard of the psychological disorder Munchausen Syndrome, you have probably also heard of a related disorder called Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, defined as
a mental health problem in which a caregiver makes up or causes an illness or injury in a person under his or her care…
–“MUNCHAUSEN SYNDROME BY PROXY,” C.S. MOTT CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL HEALTH LIBRARY
Most of the time when you hear news stories about Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, it’s because a caregiver is caught deliberately injuring a child or other vulnerable person, such as an elder or someone who is disabled.
But what if the syndrome also affects public health officials — including the person leading the U.S. response to COVID-19, Dr. Anthony Fauci?
Does that sound preposterous to you?
Things too horrible to contemplate…and yet we must.
“Normal” people are horrified by stories of Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy.
It seems unfathomable. Why would a caregiver deliberately injure a child?
But for people prone to Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy behaviors, there are compelling psychological payoffs:
The attention that caregivers get from having a sick child may encourage their [the caregivers’] behavior. Caregivers may get attention not only from doctors and nurses but also from others in their community. For example, neighbors may try to help the family in many ways—such as by doing chores, bringing meals, or giving money.
–“MUNCHAUSEN SYNDROME BY PROXY,” C.S. MOTT CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL HEALTH LIBRARY
In addition, caregivers with the syndrome don’t think they’re doing anything wrong. Per the CS Mott Children’s Hospital article, people with this condition don’t see their behavior as harmful. They are literally delusional.
Where things get tricky is catching such a person “red-handed.” Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy people are notoriously good at deceiving others, including healthcare providers, family members, and friends.
People with Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome are very good at coming across as wonderful, empathetic, involved caregivers.
An article by Brenda Bursch published by Psychiatric Times describes how difficult it is for clinicians to catch caregivers affected by this syndrome. Perpetrators tend to be skilled at falsifying disorders (many have medical backgrounds). Clinicians are often fooled. Even “formal psychiatric interview” and “psychological testing” are pretty useless in detecting the syndrome.
Many individuals confirmed to have engaged in illness falsification … have the ability to appear normal as parents/caregivers …. a key feature of an individual with a factitious disorder is the impressive ability to successfully mislead clinicians, including mental health clinicians.
–“MUNCHAUSEN BY PROXY AND FACTITIOUS DISORDER IMPOSED ON ANOTHER,” PSYCHIATRIC TIMES
Look at me! I’m saving the world!
The literature on Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome states that the condition is most often discovered in people responsible for family members (or sometimes pets).
But what if it were to affect individuals responsible for large numbers of people? What if it were to affect “experts” responsible for policies to protect the public from disasters, pandemics, and the like?
I started asking this question because of something I’ve noticed when I watch “experts” on television talk about disasters.
Maybe you’ve noticed it, too. The “experts” sometimes give off an odd vibe. They sometimes seem inappropriately “up” and excited.
Disasters are awful. They’re tragic. But many times, when the talking heads get in front of the cameras, they seem almost happy that some disaster has befallen.
I don’t think I’m alone in noticing this.
The next obvious question is: why would they be happy?
Well, guess what. The answer is very similar to the answer we get to our Menchausen Syndrome by Proxy question (“why would a caregiver intentionally harm an innocent child?”)
There’s a huge psychological payoff.
The “expert” on the television who becomes excited about an actual or impending disaster — the hurricane or polar vortex or pandemic or swarm of murder hornets — is getting attention.
They’re being admired for their expertise.
Admiration is a status-enhancer.
They also get to feel powerful and in control. I have the answers. I can explain this to people who are frightened or confused. People are looking up to me and following my instructions. I am the most important person in the world right now.
My hunch is that most of us are aware of this dynamic. It’s why we roll our eyes when the talking heads exaggerate dangers.
…Not that I object to being warned when there’s a notable weather system headed in my direction. But there’s something about being in the disaster-warning business that incentivizes people toward behaviors that feel vaguely unbalanced.
And here’s the thing: I’ve picked up on that same vibe when I’ve watched people talk about the COVID pandemic.
And then I came across a link to an old article titled “AIDS and the AZT Scandal,” published by Spin in 1989.
This play is starting to sound familiar.
1989 was a long time ago. Unless you’re in 50s or older, you probably don’t know what it was like when AIDS first came on the scene.
Let me fill you in. It was, for a while, terrifying. Nobody understood anything about the virus (HIV) that appears to cause AIDS (or at least be associated with it). It wasn’t clear how it could spread. Could we catch it from air-borne droplets? From surfaces? Should we isolate people with the disease? (Hey. What’s this remind you of?)
Fortunately, it turned out that HIV is transmitted only through close personal contact with an infected person’s blood or semen. So: sex, blood transfusions, or dirty needles.
But make no mistake. There was a period of a few years when people were really, really scared. How widespread was it? Were we all going to catch it? Were we all going to die prematurely?
But wait. There’s more.
As you may know, some of the same health authorities who were in charge during the AIDS crisis are still in charge today. Anthony Fauci — yes, that Anthony Fauci — would later come under criticism, in fact, for over-hyping the dangers of “casual” AIDS transmission.
That’s not an overstatement. Anthony Fauci was “the guy” who started an AIDS panic media feeding frenzy by suggesting in a Journal of American Medicine article that HIV could be transmitted by casual contact. (Per the link, Fauci would later call that very claim — the unsubstantiated claim that he, himself, propagated — “preposterous.” Remind you of anything yet?)
What I didn’t realize until I read the Spin piece is that Fauci also did something else in the aftermath of the AIDS outbreak: he heavily promoted the use of a particular drug, AZT, to treat it.
When the treatment is worse than the disease.
…AZT is a chemotherapy drug. It destroys bone marrow. The side effects are horrific.
The studies that the FDA used to justify fast-tracking the use of AZT as an AIDS therapy were weak, or worse (meaning: utterly compromised).
The company that sells AZT (Burroughs Wellcome) made craploads of money thanks to Fauci’s policy.
And many clinicians who were treating HIV-positive patients became convinced that AZT was actually harmful — even deadly.
There’s something else that caught my eye in that Spin piece. On August 17, 1989, our government — meaning Fauci, then as now head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), part of the National Institutes of Health — declared that people who were HIV antibody-positive (not showing any symptoms of disease, mind you, just testing positive for antibodies to the virus) should also take AZT.
That was 1.4 million people.
This guidance was, at best, utterly irresponsible. Fauci cited a study as the basis for expanding use of AZT. But there were problems with citing that study — big problems. It wasn’t even published yet. Fauci said the study had followed patients taking AZT for two years. That was false; the study period was only one year.
The study was also too small to be meaningful.
And — here’s the kicker — there was no significant difference in outcomes of patients taking AZT, compared to those who were not.
Actually, take that back. Here’s the real kicker. There was another contemporaneous study that Fauci did not mention.
Unlike the study Fauci cited, this one had been published — it appeared in December the previous year in the Lancet.
It had found that AZT was completely ineffective.
…Why would Anthony Fauci, head of NIAID, push the widespread use of a drug that made infected people sicker — probably even hastened their deaths?
It’s possible, I suppose, that he was simply ignorant.
Maybe he was too busy doing other head-of-NIAID-y things to bother actually reading the study he referenced when he recommended millions of people take a drug that destroys bone marrow.
Maybe he’d been bamboozled. Maybe he was big buddies with Burroughs Wellcome, and they were lying to him because AZT was their golden goose and they knew they needed to keep Fauci on message about it being “the” drug that would save the world from AIDS.
But there’s another possibility.
Maybe, for Fauci, there’s something extremely satisfying — even addictive — in presiding over an international response to deadly pandemics.
And maybe the payoff is higher when he works everyone into a panic.
And maybe the payoff is also higher if the best available treatment causes infected people to suffer.
Maybe if infected people have to undergo horrendous side effects during treatment, it “proves” how horrible a disease is — which makes Fauci-the-caregiver come across as that much more important.
Sound far-fetched?
What if I told you this was not just an isolated incident?
Let’s talk about Ebola.
Are you old enough to remember Ebola?
That’s another pandemic that threatened to kill us all, although in terms of severity, it makes COVID-19 look like child’s play. Ebola, a viral hemorrhagic fever, kills 50-90% of the people it infects within six to sixteen days of infection. Most people die horribly because they start hemorrhaging blood internally and externally.
Ebola’s biggest outbreak, to date, was in 2013-2016, in West Africa. Its origins are wild animals — possibly bats but most likely wild primates.
Guess who was out there at the time, issuing dire warnings about a global Ebola pandemic? The outbreak, Fauci told a “packed stadium” at the 2014 Weill Cornell’s Global Health Grand Rounds, was “an extraordinary but frightening textbook of epidemiology.” Exported cases could have a “domino effect.” If we wanted to prevent a global outbreak, we would need to deploy “an army” of professionals.
…And from a Huffington Post piece the following year:
Fauci was thrust into the spotlight. In addition to a medical expert, he became a chief public soother, a TV personality and a critical conduit between the worlds of science and politics. All the while, he worked with an Ebola patient transferred to the NIH facility.
…Are you starting to feel a bit queasy, yet?
It gets worse. Fauci later admitted that this same Ebola patient (a nurse) probably got infected because the NIH, meaning Anthony Fauci himself, failed to require sufficient PPE for healthcare workers caring for Ebola patients.
Did you catch that?
We were cooing over the guy for caring for a patient that FAUCI HIMSELF had put at risk of contracting Ebola!
What’s Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, again?
So what about Ebola treatments?
Interestingly, the Ebola outbreak was also leveraged by the Centers for Disease Control and the pharmaceutical company Gilead to test an anti-viral drug that you might of heard about in the news recently: remdesivir.
Remdesivir was tested in Africa as a potential treatment for Ebola.
It failed.
…Remdesivir didn’t go away, however. In April 2020, our Anthony Fauci announced that it was the magic bullet that would cure COVID. The drug he said, had been proven to “block” the COVID virus.
The US health chief went so far as to liken it to the discovery of the first medicine found to help treat HIV more than three decades ago.
–“US HEALTH CHIEF ANTHONY FAUCI PROMOTES EBOLA DRUG TO TREAT CORONAVIRUS,” THE NEWDAILY
“The first medicine to help treat HIV?”
You mean: AZT?
Not everybody thought Fauci’s announcement about remdesivir as “the” COVID cure was appropriate. He’d based his statement on a study that wasn’t yet published. He was dismissive of a study in China that failed to find the promised benefits of remdesivir to COVID patients.
Remember what Fauci did with AZT? Announced that it was an AIDS cure based on a study that wasn’t yet published — while ignoring studies that called the drug’s efficacy into question?
Remdesivir was subsequently granted Emergency Use Authorization for in-patient treatment of severe COVID. (By the way, there are NINE Gilead employees on the CDC advisory panel that green-lighted the drug.)
So what about remdesivir’s side effects?
Turns out, they are potentially pretty awful — right up to kidney failure.
…How to catch an abusive “caregiver.”
Let’s go back to that Psychiatric Times article on Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy that I referenced at the beginning of this post — the one that told us how good abusive caregivers are at hiding what they’re doing.
The most effective way to identify abusive caregivers, writes this article’s author, is to look at a patient’s medical records. Look for clues or patterns that indicate a caregiver is misleading clinicians. Give preference to data submitted by clinicians who directly observe documented information, rather than relying on accounts provided by the suspected abuser. Think about whether records make clinical sense.
Chronologically summarizing each medical contact into a table reveals patterns of health care utilization and parent/caregiver behavior in a format that is easy to analyze.
—“MUNCHAUSEN BY PROXY AND FACTITIOUS DISORDER IMPOSED ON ANOTHER,” PSYCHIATRIC TIMES
That’s what we need to do.
We need to look for patterns.
We need to look at information provided by the actual scientists who study how to contain and treat infectious diseases, including COVID, and compare what they’re saying to Anthony Fauci’s public guidance.
Here are some of the patterns I see.
Fauci seeks media and public attention. He clearly relishes being viewed as a caring, even sacrificial person.
He often makes statements that seem careless — and that throw the public into a panic.
He has, on more than one occasion, touted unproven drugs as being magical cures. These drugs later turned out to be useless at best. At worst, they exacerbated peoples’ suffering.
So what we should be asking…
Are “patients” who accept Fauci’s “care” better off than patients who do not?
Were the HIV-positive people who took massive doses of the bone marrow-destroying drug AZT better off than the patients who pursued other courses of care?
Are COVID patients who are administered remdesivir more likely or less likely to beat the virus than patients who are not?
And while we’re at it, how about the vaccine?
…So, regardless of whether you are pro-vax, anti-vax, vax-mandator or vax-hesitant, the facts are this:
a person with natural immunity who does NOT get the vax is:
A. Well-protected from COVID and,
B. Safe from the risk of vaccine side effects.
By definition, this person is better-served by refusing to follow Anthony Fauci’s advice to get vaccinated (he’s on record as thinking we should get to 90% vaccination rates; this would, by definition, mean people with natural immunity would get the jab).
But instead of saying so — instead of saying that people with natural immunity might be better off avoiding the vax — when pressed on the question, Fauci wriggled. “I don’t have a really firm answer for you on that,” he said. “That’s something that we’re going to have to discuss regarding the durability of the response.”
What would a Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy caregiver say, if a clinician suggested the patient in the person’s care might be perfectly healthy and ready to resume a normal life?
…The caregiver would hesitate. The caregiver would stall rather than accept the prognosis. The person would look for ways to suggest the patient might need additional interventions.
…Put another way: if the COVID pandemic fades away, so does the 80-year-old Dr. Anthony Fauci. His last moment in the spotlight is gone.
The Intercept published 700 pages of leaked documents that cast serious doubts on Fauci’s credibility. These documents
contain new evidence that:
the Wuhan Institute of Virology and the nearby Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment, along with their collaborator, the U.S.-based nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance, have engaged in what the U.S. government defines as “gain-of-function research of concern,” intentionally making viruses more pathogenic or transmissible in order to study them, despite stipulations from a U.S. funding agency that the money not be used for that purpose.
–“NIH DOCUMENTS PROVIDE NEW EVIDENCE U.S. FUNDED GAIN-OF-FUNCTION RESEARCH IN WUHAN,” THE INTERCEPT
What does this tell us about Fauci’s conduct?
A man whose responsibility, nominally, is to protect Americans from the threat of infectious disease was secretly backing experiments that could unleash particularly dangerous strains of infectious disease.
Why would he do this?
Is it possible that Fauci, a caregiver with Munchausen by Proxy Syndrome, was working behind the scenes to make his patients sick?
Now: think about this.
We literally call Anthony Fauci a saint.
Saint Fauci, we call him.
I don’t think he’s a saint, at all.
I think he’s the opposite.
This morning I saw a funny video about a dog named Kevin.
This one is certainly named Karen.
It kinda is for you.
EXCLUSIVE: Maricopa County Supervisor Steve Chucri on 2020 Election in Leaked Recording: “I Think It Was Done Through DEAD PEOPLE Voting. I Think IT WAS MULTIFACETED – BALLOT HARVESTING” (AUDIO)
This thread doesn’t have time for hot house flowers whose feelings get hurt … we are fighting a war! If you’re scared or dainty, step to the back, and let those who can take a few shots.
There’s no time to cuddle the wounded right now. We are all hurting. We must push forward.
Mr. K is just a distraction. They’re talking about vaxxing 5 year olds!
I didn’t save anyone.
Jesus saves =o)
Not looking to give false hope or medical advice here. Just sharing the story
...that is all
+++++++++++++++++++
Oh that’s a really good story! So glad the co-worker is doing better.
Yes, Jesus saves, but sometimes he sends humans to help!
Petey
very very interesting article - ThankQ :)
Dooood!
Give it a rest.
Funny thing about life, I’m figuring out. It keeps on being never the same, just when you think you are settling in.
I wish somebody woulda told me that a long time ago.
*******************************
It’s more fun to be surprised, I’m thinking. You’ll make a wonderful grandfather - partners in crime :-)
#FakeNews CNN - BRIAN STELTER SAYS “STOP DOING YOUR OWN RESEARCH!”
How ‘do your own research’ hurts America’s Covid response
“We should have a healthy skepticism of the information that is fed to us,” Yael Eisenstat says. But a phrase like “do your own research” is often peddled by conspiracy theorists and vaccine-deniers. “It is always easy to find information that confirms your biases,” she points out.
Source: CNN
H/T: https://greatawakening.win/p/13zMs9JoTj/shit-is-getting-crazy-over-the-t/c/
Potentially serious.
I have not had time to do more than skim;
possible credence is lent by the additional readerapp links at the bottom (look at the institutional affiliations).
Please check this out & propagate ONLY IF WARRANTED.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thank you for the link. The video was already gone but I transferred all the other images to an old Festival.
Here's the link:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3991675/posts?page=2235#2235
I think it's probably worth posting, because I have seen some of this (the fibrous wires, the reflective white dots etc.) in a video with a specific named researcher (Germany, or Austria?). I don't know the source of this specific post so would like to track down the original conference.
Again, thanks! :D
Health slide...
My new doctor is very nice. Didn’t give me a hard time at all about any of my meds.
I was a nervous wreck though hahahahaha. My BP was 170/90 😲.
It’s better now.
Thank you everyone who responded. I am most grateful for the support and good ideas.
Petey
Mark
So hoping for a new thread, one free of troll battles and of feeding an attention addiction.
Mark
So hoping for a new thread, one free of troll battles and of feeding an attention addiction.
“....unless you were deliberately trying to anger or confuse people”
~~~
And God is not the author of confusion
The injectable version is a higher concentration so you have to recalculate the dosage.
But you just drink it, you don’t have to inject it.
gisd O
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3997006/posts?page=2
Politico Playbook: Hey, the Hunter-laptop story was legit after all
hotair.com ^ | 9/21/2021 | ed morrissey
https://www.politico.com/playbook
Excellent article!!
See this piece about Fauci; could add dictator to the Munchausen by proxy:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3996993/posts
https://www.bitchute.com/video/wnUuvUqx5dkV/?list=subscriptions
Per post 7 in the thread,
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3996993/posts?page=7#7
Fauci says
“We will pressure you, strip you of your livelihood, remove your ability to participate in public events, and make your life as miserable as possible until you ‘willingly’ get vaccinated”
And post 9 from different listener says same thing
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3996993/posts?page=9#9
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
