|
Posted on 09/19/2021 4:52:43 AM PDT by ransomnote
6:33 AM · Sep 17, 2021·Twitter for iPhoneQ is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
We saw them when we were landing in Long Beach and a week later when we flew out of Long Beach.
Yeah, I thought of that, but it would be too much work for the people I am attempting to reach with this flyer.
I am hoping to find some source that offers sort of an apologetics for this change in the hopes that some people who read it might say, “Now, hold on one gosh darn minute. This seems a bit bonkers.”
I’m sorry; I didn’t mean you post all the links yourself;
but that you look there for the change, and paraphrase what the change consists of, and if they changed it ONLY for the coof, or if they changed it in the middle of the coof (”How conVEEEEEEENient”)
Again, let it go. Grow a pellicle.
NOT a food slide!
It’s okay. I just thought I would ask in case you might know of a good article of the type I was looking for.
I’m trying to keep this flyer idea in the minds of people on this thread generally.
I would ideally like to include a myth-fact set on the change of definition of a case.
The trouble is that some ideas are not easily phrased in one of these sets nor can they be easily cited with the right type of source.
Tsunami mark for later.
NOT a food slide!
You’re welcome.
Do you know someone who is threatening to marry their cousin?
By the way, I am having an argument with someone over the whole cousin thing.
At what point does the idea of marrying your cousin stop being disgusting.
She maintains you have to be more than six times removed.
(Hiccup!)
TC: Sorry about your friend.
Thanks. Oh, the part I forgot to mention (rant) ... The poor fella was vaccinated too. For what ‘good’ that did.
So, yeah, seriously, for all the folks on the thread who may see this - take care of yourselves, and the ones you care about, because you can’t depend on anyone else to.
Rat basitid! 😜😜😜💖
The article goes on ... A total of 712 pregnancies (86.1%) resulted in a live birth, mostly among participants who received their first vaccination dose in the third trimester.
Hence the 104 spontaneous abortions happened in the smaller number of pregnancies in the first or second trimester. Let's say "mostly" in the quoted sentence is 60% That leaves about 300 live births and 104 spontaneous abortions among the first and second semester pregnancies, or a spontaneous abortion rate of 25% or more, vs the "normal" rate of about 13%.
Seems like something worthy of attention.
BYE FELICIA!
CNN is comparing the Haitian migrants to Holocaust refugees https://t.co/RJU7T45itL— Jack Posobiec 🇺🇸 (@JackPosobiec) September 21, 2021
We do the best we can. My kids were vaccinated even though I didn’t like it but my husband and I aren’t taking it.
I get out around people more than he does so I do all I can not to bring it home.
This will sound really “out there”. But do you think there might be a chance that exposure to Agent Orange while in Vietnam might have given him an added susceptibility?
My dad’s 1982 death of lung cancer was felt by his doctors to have been exacerbated by exposure to OA. My half-brother, (a Marine), died this past January of a rare form of cancer. His doctors don’t believe OA was a direct cause, since it’s been so long since Nam. But one opined that the exposure changed something chemically or hormonally in his body, making him vulnerable without displaying any overt symptoms. His immune system became a little run-down from age and overwork, and BAM, enter the rare cancer.
Bill Mitchell’s belief in “red flag” laws a couple of years ago was why I quit following him on twooooter. He seemed to think that the government, the very entity from whom the second amendment was written to protect, should have such an unwarranted say in who should or shouldn’t have a firearm.
Seeing today’s rendition of “government” as well as the events taking place in Australia and elsewhere, I think it’s pretty obvious that letting the government pick who can or cannot be armed is akin to letting the fox choose the guard for the henhouse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
