Posted on 09/18/2021 9:57:24 AM PDT by MNDude
just saw videos today of an abortionist admitting Regeneron is created by dissecting the liver out from a fetus with a live heart. This liver is then used to "humanize" a mouse for further ingredients.
How can we possibly support such a demon drug?
Certainly not for the right reasons, but Joe did the right thing.
No, Jane, that research created IL-6 mice and Regeneron uses their own patented VI mice. There is more than one way to create humanized mice for medical research and many of them use donated adult tissues or umbilical cord tissue.
Yes I do. You picked the terms to use. So he’ll yes your terms suck. Use their terms. Feel free to continue. You show your true heart. Suck away you blood suckers. Fetal lines are evil. No excuse. .
It looks like there are two steps, though.
My understanding is they humanized the mice first, possibly with fetal DNA (that’s what we don’t know for sure), which gives them a human-like immune system. Unborn babies do start developing an immune system according to this: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6606446/. Otherwise, we would be losing a lot of newborns to covid and I have not heard of that.
THEN they use these humanized mice who are “immunized with a DNA plasmid that expresses SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and then were boosted with a recombinant protein composed of the RBD of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein”. The mice mount an immune response and they use those antibodies and the antibodies from recovered human patients.
We know that the company uses adult and fetal stem cells for their research, we just don’t know for this particular usage.
The jury is out for me.
Except of course, the company states that no fetal tissues were used in the development or production of their covid monoclonal antibodies.
Since they admit to using fetal tissue in other projects and are completely open about using HEK293 for testing, why would they lie about it for this project?
Especially when they are proud of what they do and how they do it and are well aware of the public relations cost of dissembling.
Maybe they believe that testing on is less controversial than being derived from.
I don’t know. I have become a cynic about things companies say these days.
Bumping...good information!
We only have ourselves, as individuals working together, to rely upon these days. Our government, medical institutions, and media have failed us and are even aggressively working against us.
It's as if some evil spirit has taken over what we implemented (government and institutions) to advance and safeguard civilization.
You’re deliberately confusing the issue.
The cord blood is prized for the stem cells which are used (for example) for Leukemia patients.
The issues there are finding a good enough match (even though you don’t need as stringent a match to the patient with cord blood cells as with adult marrow cells); low total volume of cells; and defraying of keeping the cord cells at liquid nitrogen temperature until there is a match...and of older lots didn’t have typing done to the same level of detail as is now available; course, due to small sample size (see above), it’s just not worth it to take another sample from the same donation of cord blood and do a more thorough test.
“ You’re deliberately confusing the issue.”
———————————————————————
You posted the fake pic that was posted by some dude on the internet, not me.
I’m not at all confused.
Yes you are, you're replying to the wrong post of mine.
Ok.
I did reply to the wrong post on the wrong thread.
Senior moments are happening more and more these days.
You *were* jabbed, right?
Look out for microclotting in the brain.
Add left wing kooks like Robert Kennedy Jr. to that list, he's behind a lot of the nonsense we're hearing about vaccines.
More info. from a Pro-Life Catholic group:
LMAO!! 🤣😆😂🤪
I’m going to the VAERS web-site. I got some reportin’ ta do……
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.