Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thinking of trying ivermectin for COVID? Here's what can happen with this controversial drug (Author admits to lying!)
Medical XPress / The Conversation ^ | Sept. 2, 2021 | Nial Wheate

Posted on 09/02/2021 9:45:18 AM PDT by ConservativeMind

…The person went to hospital seeking treatment for diarrhoea and vomiting side-effects, after taking the drug, which is usually used to treat parasites. The person had ordered this and other unproven COVID "cures" online.

While the patient did not die, health authorities are concerned at the number of people taking ivermectin, and warn against it for anyone else who may have COVID symptoms or has been diagnosed with the virus.

So far, there is no clinical evidence it works to treat or prevent COVID-19. And there is widespread consensus people should not take ivermectin at home for COVID-19.

What does it do to your body?

We know very little about what the drug does to humans, and the little we do know mostly comes from its use in animals.

When taken at the recommended dose, the drug is generally well tolerated. But ivermectin is known to cause mild side-effects such as diarrhoea, nausea, dizziness and sleepiness. Less common, but serious, side-effects include severe skin rashes and effects on the nervous system (causing tremor, confusion and drowsiness).

The take-home message

The public is understandably interested in medicines to treat and prevent COVID-19. However, misinformation about ivermectin and others continues to circulate.

(Excerpt) Read more at medicalxpress.com ...


TOPICS: Health/Medicine
KEYWORDS: cdc; drjasonmcelyea; ivermectin; jasonmcelyea; merck; nialwheate; nih; nobelprize; oklahoma; rollingstone; williamcampbell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last
Lie #1: “So far, there is no clinical evidence it works to treat or prevent COVID-19.”

Rebuttal: “There are more than 113 studies, with 73 peer reviewed and 63 with results comparing treatment and control groups.

https://c19ivermectin.com/

Lie #2: “We know very little about what the drug does to humans, and the little we do know mostly comes from its use in animals.”

Rebuttal: “The Food and Drug Administration claims to follow the science. So why is it attacking ivermectin, a medication it certified in 1996?”

“Ivermectin is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines. Merck has donated four billion doses to prevent river blindness and other diseases in Africa and other places where parasites are common.”

https://www.wsj.com/articles/fda-ivermectin-covid-19-coronavirus-masks-anti-science-11627482393

That doesn't even begin to cover all the paid use/prescriptions humans have used of ivermectin!

Author's mea culpa—This is where the author accidentally tells us all he's lying through his teeth: “When taken at the recommended dose, the drug is generally well tolerated.”

1 posted on 09/02/2021 9:45:18 AM PDT by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

We know very little about what the drug does to humans...

Yes, it’s only been in use for 40 years. That means its track record is far worse than the mRNA vaccines which have been in use for 9 months, because SCIENCE and the FDA says so.


2 posted on 09/02/2021 9:50:27 AM PDT by Flick Lives (We may or may not have reached herd immunity, but we've definitely achieved herd stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

ConservativeMind wrote: “Author’s mea culpa—This is where the author accidentally tells us all he’s lying through his teeth: “When taken at the recommended dose, the drug is generally well tolerated.””

One could also say: “When taken at the recommended dose, the vaccines are effective and are generally well tolerated.”


3 posted on 09/02/2021 9:52:12 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

It’s safety record is Far Superior than Tylenol and Aspirin!!


4 posted on 09/02/2021 9:52:19 AM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325771/WHO-MVP-EMP-IAU-2019.06-eng.pdf

WHO list of essential medicines. Both Ivermectin and HCQ have been on the list for many years.


5 posted on 09/02/2021 9:52:40 AM PDT by Pollard (#*&% Communism)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Only a billion doses have been given to humans with zero side effects. Did he interview the guy who had the severe side effects so we can know he isn’t another made up story?


6 posted on 09/02/2021 9:54:21 AM PDT by bray (Time to resign Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke
The vaccines have no history beyond this year and have had far fewer doses administered than that of ivermectin over many decades.

Your statement cannot be true as it is for ivermectin.

7 posted on 09/02/2021 9:55:08 AM PDT by ConservativeMind (Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
“We know very little about what the drug does to humans, and the little we do know mostly comes from its use in animals.”

Can't the same be said for the vaccine? I mean other then all the animals died and it does not have a 40 year track record of human use.
8 posted on 09/02/2021 9:55:53 AM PDT by JoSixChip (2020: The year of unreported truths. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

They say the one patient ‘over-dosed’ but yet they do not discuss the proper dosage, because they wouldn’t want to give their readers any useful information. The world medical community has the failed THE PEOPLE.


9 posted on 09/02/2021 9:58:34 AM PDT by oil_dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

In case anyone is wondering why Merck would downplay Ivermectin (which they have produce under the brand Stromectil since 1995 - past Patent protection).

https://www.merck.com/news/merck-announces-supply-agreement-with-u-s-government-for-molnupiravir-an-investigational-oral-antiviral-candidate-for-treatment-of-mild-to-moderate-covid-19/

Ivermectin has been touted as a “Wonder Drug” by the NIH and is on the WHO list of essential medicine.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/

This “new” drug starts with an order for $1.2Billion from the US Government for 1.7M doses. (~$705/dose)


10 posted on 09/02/2021 9:58:40 AM PDT by monkeypants (It's a Republic, if you can keep it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DugwayDuke

Yeah, the vax is well tolerated - especially for the 3 people I personally know who have died from it and the other one who is currently hospitalized for severe clotting in many organs.

Keep believing your fairy tale.

I only know two who died with Covid. With - not from.


11 posted on 09/02/2021 10:00:01 AM PDT by datura (The voice that brought you peace has nothing left to say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

bbb


12 posted on 09/02/2021 10:02:15 AM PDT by thinden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Mectizan.org


13 posted on 09/02/2021 10:05:07 AM PDT by IllumiNaughtyByNature (Polls are no longer designed to measure public sentiment but to influence it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
Ivermectin in COVID-19
14 posted on 09/02/2021 10:05:46 AM PDT by Heartlander (Prediction: Increasingly, logic will be seen as a covert form of theism. - Denyse O'Leary)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

The problem is not Invermectin, but taking it without proper guidance. ANY drug can be misused. And they are blatantly lying about it never being approved for human use.


15 posted on 09/02/2021 10:09:04 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives
They hand this out like candy to Africans in areas afflicted by riverworms, billions of doses used in 40 years, drug sold OTC in Mexico, Japan medical establishment just went full over for ivermectin, prescribed worldwide incl USA for years for scabies, head lice, bed bugs

Writers like this should be sued for publishing potentially life threatening misinformation

16 posted on 09/02/2021 10:11:53 AM PDT by silverleaf (In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

” But ivermectin is known to cause mild side-effects such as diarrhoea, nausea, dizziness and sleepiness.”

Isn’t that what a night of Jack Daniels does to a person?


17 posted on 09/02/2021 10:14:22 AM PDT by ryderann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewJerseyJoe

P4L


18 posted on 09/02/2021 10:17:53 AM PDT by NewJerseyJoe (Rat mantra: "Facts are meaningless! You can use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind
"But ivermectin is known to cause mild side-effects such as diarrhoea, nausea, dizziness and sleepiness. Less common, but serious, side-effects include severe skin rashes and effects on the nervous system (causing tremor, confusion and drowsiness)."

Has the author ever listened to the TV ads for commonly available prescription drugs? ALL of them warn of possible side effects, including serious ones.
19 posted on 09/02/2021 10:19:35 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

The liberal mind.

They deride using veterinary grade ivermectin as dangerous but force its use as opposed to clinical grade ivermectin by refusing to distribute it for Covid patients.

In other words they refuse usage of the safe alternative.

But normally their foundational principles are to make abortion safe and legal because otherwise it’s too dangerous.


20 posted on 09/02/2021 10:53:10 AM PDT by ifinnegan ( Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-53 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson