CDC Considers Novavax COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Participants As Fully Vaccinated Two Weeks After Dosing

NASDAQ ^ | 08/30/2021

[SeekAndFind]

(RTTNews) - Novavax Inc. (NVAX) said that the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or CDC has provided updated guidance for those who have been vaccinated as part of a clinical trial in the U.S.

The CDC guidance stated that participants in the Novavax's late-stage COVID-19 vaccine trial meet the criteria to be considered fully vaccinated two weeks after they have completed the vaccine series.

"We are grateful to all of our clinical trial participants who have helped create a safer future for all,"said Gregory Glenn President of Research and Development, Novavax.

As per the CDC updated guidance, If a participant in a U.S.-based clinical trial has been documented to have received the full series of an "active" (not placebo) COVID-19 vaccine candidate, and vaccine efficacy has been independently confirmed, the participant can be considered fully vaccinated 2 weeks after they completed the vaccine series. Currently, the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine meets these criteria. This does not imply that the vaccine has been authorized by FDA or is recommended by CDC or ACIP.

Novavax said its clinical trial participants who did not receive the full 2-dose series of the active COVID-19 vaccine candidate should be counseled by trial investigators to follow current prevention measures to protect themselves against COVID-19 and offered an FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccine series.

Novavax noted that PREVENT-19 Phase 3 clinical trial, the company's study to assess the safety and efficacy of the company's recombinant nanoparticle protein vaccine, NVX-CoV2373 with Matrix-M adjuvant, demonstrated 90% overall efficacy and 100% protection against moderate and severe disease.

[kiryandil]

They’re not even pretending any more...

[SeekAndFind]

FURTHER REPORT HERE:

https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/novavax-statement-on-cdc-guidance-update-for-covid-19-clinical-trial-participants-301365458.html

[EXCERPT]

As part of its overall guidance regarding COVID-19 vaccines, the CDC’s website has been updated to include the following section, which specifically addresses participants in the Novavax PREVENT-19 trial:

---

“People vaccinated for COVID-19 as part of a clinical trial in the United States

Some people in the United States have completed a COVID-19 vaccination series as part of a U.S.-based clinical trial involving a COVID-19 vaccine that is not currently authorized by FDA.

People who received the full series of an active COVID-19 vaccine candidate as part of a U.S.-based clinical trial of a COVID-19 vaccine that is neither authorized by FDA nor listed for emergency use by WHO

If a participant in a U.S.-based clinical trial has been documented to have received the full series of an “active” (not placebo) COVID-19 vaccine candidate, and vaccine efficacy has been independently confirmed (e.g., by a data and safety monitoring board), the participant can be considered fully vaccinated 2 weeks after they completed the vaccine series. Currently, the Novavax COVID-19 vaccine meets these criteria. This does not imply that the vaccine has been authorized by FDA or is recommended by CDC or ACIP.

Novavax clinical trial participants who did not receive the full 2-dose series of the active COVID-19 vaccine candidate should be counseled by trial investigators to follow current prevention measures to protect themselves against COVID-19 and offered an FDA-authorized COVID-19 vaccine series.”

---

PREVENT-19, Novavax’ study to assess the safety and efficacy of the company’s recombinant nanoparticle protein vaccine, NVX-CoV2373 with Matrix-M™ adjuvant, demonstrated 90% overall efficacy and 100% protection against moderate and severe disease.

[kiryandil]

demonstrated 90% overall efficacy and 100% protection against moderate and severe disease.

Yadda-yadda, blahblahblah, we're all a team...

[Bob434]

that’s mighty humble of them to deign to consider folks fully vaxxed- and ‘allow’ folks to continue life as usual, but apparently ONLY IF they wear masks still and social distance for, well, forever it appears-

[[and vaccine efficacy has been independently confirmed, the participant can be considered fully vaccinated 2 weeks after they completed the vaccine series.]]

And “Be considered fully vaxxed” to do what exactly? Buy and Sell freely? Walk around in public without worry of being arrested?

[TheConservativeParty]

CDC should be “considered” a criminal organization.

[redcatcherb412]

So how many months till the booster is needed? 4 or 5? Does this one have that nasty old graphene mix too? Any baby DNA needed to test it like the others? So many questions.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: So how many months till the booster is needed? 4 or 5? Does this one have that nasty old graphene mix too? Any baby DNA needed to test it like the others? So many questions.

You will need to watch and learn to answer your questions.

Start here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q00lyd3gyy4

This video by a Doctor and Microbiologist actually EXLAINS how the Novavax vaccine was developed, its mechanism and also answers moral objections to it, like fetal cell line use.

[ransomnote]

I missed the part where we’re a herd that our betters keep vaxxed and registered so we can be allowed to come and go out of our pens.

[ransomnote]

Unfortunately, as the damage caused by spike proteins in mRNA and J&J/Astrazeneca become painfully known, the biowarfare attack shifts to Novavax. Because spike protiens have been identified as harmful, Novavax is pretending it is not an injection of pure spike proteins. Some of Novavax's marketing refers to 'protein sub units'. Yes, those are spike proteins; they just don't want you to know. Here's my prior post on Novavax, the pure spike protein injection harvested from moth cells, and some of the failed history of the company.

My notes on Dr. John Campbell's video "TUESDAY UPDATE" in which he reviews Novavax and a small Ivermectin study in Israel.
youtube.com ^ | Jun 15, 2021 | Dr. John Campbell and vanity

Posted on 6/16/2021, 2:03:15 AM by ransomnote

Dr. Campbell notes that he's reading from a press release and the vaccine research has not been peer reviewed yet.

ransomnote: I was wondering why there were so many news articles for Novavax all dated 6/14. Almost like press releases = free advertising from MSM. I saw elsewhere that Novavax development was also supported by the Bill & Melinda Gates foundation, among others.

How Novavax works:

DNA designed to make the spike proteins is put into another virus and that virus is put into moth cells. The DNA instructs the moth cells to mass produce the spike proteins, then the spike proteins are harvested (purified) from the moth cells. 

The spike cells stick together and have the antigenic properties of the Sars 2 Covid virus, without the actual presence of the Covid virus.

ransomnote: Covid spike proteins are causing harm in other vaccines. Inventor Of mRNA Vaccine Technology: Spike Protein Is Dangerous, Its Cytotoxic. The FDA Was Warned About It Months Ago

First case of postmortem study in a patient vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 [Spike Protein in every organ in his body!] or transcript:

Dr. Mercola Explains Dr. Bridle’s Bombshell Revelations Regarding Spike Proteins from Vaccines

Former Chief Science Officer at PFIZER VP: “THE THING TO BE TERRIFIED OF IS YOUR GOVERNMENT” (bitchute.com) Dr. Yeadon

Compared with the mRNA vaccines and DNA 'vaccines', which tell your own body cells to produce the spike protein, the Novavax is designed to directly inject the spike proteins into your body. 

2:1 trials mean twice the number of vaccinated participants compared to unvaccinated participants.

Novavax's efficacy claim is 100% protection against moderate and severe disease. Claim-  all deaths and hospitalizations occurred in control group. Claim - its 90% effective overall and 91% effective in high risk groups. This data applies to their Jan 25 to April 30 trial duration.

ransomnote: Efficacy after that 3 month window unknown. For those new to manufacturer's efficacy claims, you may want to read this thread: Check Your Understanding Of The "Efficacy" Claims For 'Vaccines': The Claim "95% Effective" Means A Fraction Of 1% Of The Vaccinated Are "Protected" For 2 Months

Novavax was tested against a Covid variant very similar to, but not the same as, the original Covid virus.

---

The long shot [Novavax Covid Vaccine]

6/15/2021, 11:38:33 PM · by ransomnote · 16 replies

sciencemag.org ^ | 06 Nov 2020: | Meredith Wadman

Novavax's vaccine is made of tiny particles studded with the coronavirus spike protein plus honeycomblike molecules, derived from plants, that stimulate the immune system.Image of Novavax's tiny particles studded with coronavirus spike proteinsEighteen months ago, a small vaccinemaker here called Novavax faced an existential threat: delisting by the NASDAQ stock index. On the heels of a second failed vaccine trial in less than 3 years, the firm's shares had plunged to less than $1 for 30 straight days, triggering a warning by NASDAQ. Frantic to conserve cash, the company sold its two Maryland manufacturing facilities, slicing its payroll by more..

[ransomnote]

Kulvinder Kaur MD on Twitter

Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in community-dwelling populations with emphasis on the elderly: An overview | medRxiv

 

[roving]

They said the same thing about the other ones. Turned out they lied.

[Pollard]

https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04368988

Phase 1/2 est completion date May 2022

[nonsporting]

Whether it’s mRNA technology to induce spike protein production (Pfizer, Moderna), or adenovirus DNA modifications (J&J), or the introduction of spike proteins outright (Novavax), these *vaccines* are still based on spike proteins.

Ivermectin, on the other hand, interferes with the undesirable effects of spike proteins and permits the host to effectively combat the virus before being overwhelmed. Ivermectin won’t “kill the virus”, but will permit the human immune system to counteract the virus.

I choose Ivermectin.

[Jim Noble]

The process is messed up.

This is not an anti-vaxx comment, if you are an anti-vaxx person, no need to respond, I’ve heard it all.

Most vaccinations occur as a series which is completed over 6-12 months, with a “booster” if needed 3-15 years later.

Two doses 21 or 28 days apart are very unlikely to constitute a primary series, and, as we now see, they don’t.

And, of course, the idea that J&J would be “one and done” was absurd from the drop. Since J&J two dose data has been slow walked, we are just going to see it now, and (pro tip), two doses of J&J will be MUCH better than one, AND, the J&J patients may do the best overall BECAUSE dose #2 has been appropriately delayed.

It’s much better to regard Pfizer and Moderna “complete immunization” as split dose #1 (I gather that doubling the split dose into a single dose produced side effects in Phase I).

Should dose #2 be given at 3, 4. 6, or twelve months for maximum effect and durability?

NO ONE HAS ANY IDEA. This is being made up as we go along.