Posted on 08/26/2021 10:01:05 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Purpose: Primary outcome was to measure the number of healthcare workers with symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection and a positive reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) COVID-19 test in the ivermectin group and in the control group. Secondary outcome was to measure the number of sick healthcare workers with a positive RT-PCR COVID-19 test whose condition deteriorated and required hospitalization and/or an Intensive Care Unit (ICU), or who died, in the ivermectin group and in the control group.
Material and methods: This observational and retrospective cohort study was carried out in two medical centers, Centro Medico Bournigal (CMBO) in Puerto Plata and Centro Medico Punta Cana (CMPC) in Punta Cana, Dominican Republic. The study began on June 29, 2020, and ended on July 26, 2020. A Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) Propensity Score Matching procedure was applied in a 1:1 ratio to homogeneously evaluate 271 healthcare personnel that adhered to a PrEP program with ivermectin at a weekly oral (PO) dose of 0.2 mg/kg, and 271 healthcare personnel who did not adhere to the program were assigned as a control group.
Results: In 28 days of follow-up, significant protection of ivermectin preventing the infection from SARS-CoV-2 was observed: 1.8% compared to those who did not take it (6.6%; p-value = 0.006), with a risk reduction of 74% (HR 0.26, 95% CI [0.10,0.71]).
Conclusions: These results suggest that compassionate use of weekly ivermectin could be an option as a preventive method in healthcare workers and as an adjunct to immunizations,
(Excerpt) Read more at cureus.com ...
Ping for your interest
Please add me to your list. Thx.
Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19
FAQ: COVID-19 and Ivermectin Intended for Animals.
My trust in the federal government is about zero.
bkmk
bookmark
When comparing both groups the difference was not statistically significant in deterioration that required hospitalization and/or ICU (p-value=0.499) and in death (p-value=1.000
a) not so experimental vaccine at 85-90% against Wuhan original and 70-85% Delta symptom protection and 95%+ overall death protection that’s proven, or
b) an experimental parasitic at 74% effective symptom protection after 16-28 days, if taken religiously forever (although some of those in India still got sick) and no statistical protection against death. Its excretion is 99% hepatic and only 1% is excreted in the urine (got liver?)
c) go naked
Unfortunately, this study only looks at ivermectin challenged by Alpha Covid.
But we’re beyond alpha. These studies would have to be repeated with ivermectin challenged by Delta to get a more accurate percentage of protection real-time.
74% is very impressive.
On the other hand, the study was done in the Dominican Republic.
I want to trust these numbers, but there are a lot of startling medical studies that come out of poor developing countries that create a one time PR sensation, and then disappear forever.
Everyone knows this but our hospitals, liberals, and our CDC
I asked my doctor for an ivermectin scripts, and she refused. She also refused the malaria/lupus drug, HCQ. Maybe next time I’ll visit when I have the sweats prevalent to malaria.
Maybe you should get a new doc?
Bkmk
Niece was given ivermectin in hospital for CV19 and fully recovered.
8 family members are taking Ivermax horse paste once a week with spoonful of olive oil to increase up take. No sickness.
I even hugged a young lady at her gmothers funeral who was sick with COVID. I felt so sorry for her since everyone was avoiding her like the plaque. Still kicking 3 weeks later.
This is all another gaslighting issued by our feral government. Lies, effin lies and more lies
Ping
Heres the scoop on Ivermectin:
If you cannot get a physician’s prescription, you can order it here:
1) https://www.ziverdo-kit.com
2) https://www.indiamart.com ( get 12 mg tabs)
Protocols to follow for both Prophylaxis and Therapy for Infection:
https://covid19criticalcare.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/FLCCC-I-MASK-Protocol-v4-2020-11-22.pdf
Ivermectin is no longer a banned treatment by the CDC. They are just “not recommending” it.
You will need over the counter Zinc, Vitamin D and Quercetin supplements.
Hundreds of Feepers stocked up over the last 6 months.
********************************
There is reasonably solid evidence that ivermectin docks to the spike protein itself to prevent binding to the ACE2 receptor which is the primary pathology causing the tissue damage and clots related to SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, this is also an implication that this ability of ivermectin to disable the binding of the Spike protein including the vaccine-produced spike proteins. This binding of ivermectin to disable the spike protein is also preserved even with the newer spike protein mutations, but its activity against the original Wuhan spike protein,(the one vaccines were designed to produce) is fairly well studied at this point.
Abstract:
Background/Aim: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). One drug that has attracted interest is the antiparasitic compound ivermectin, a macrocyclic lactone derived from the bacterium Streptomyces avermitilis. We carried out a docking study to determine if ivermectin might be able to attach to the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound with ACE2. Materials and Methods: We used the program AutoDock Vina Extended to perform the docking study. Results: Ivermectin docked in the region of leucine 91 of the spike and histidine 378 of the ACE2 receptor. The binding energy of ivermectin to the spike-ACE2 complex was -18 kcal/mol and binding constant was 5.8 e-08. Conclusion: The ivermectin docking we identified may interfere with the attachment of the spike to the human cell membrane. Clinical trials now underway should determine whether ivermectin is an effective treatment for SARS-Cov2 infection.
The following video explains the multiple mechanisms of the activity of Ivermectin including the ability of the body to maintain its basic defense of the cell nucleus in preserving the body’s ability to produce antiviral proteins, inhibition of RNA dependant RNA polymerase which inhibits the replication of viral RNA (possibly including that from the mRNA vaccine package), the stat 3 human signaling pathway which inhibits the production of blood clots also possibly mitigating some of the vaccines most dangerous side effects. Also discussed is the inhibition of the CD147 pathway by ivermectin which again may block the clumping of platelets due to spike protein either from the virus or possibly the vaccines.
Note: Ivermectin therapy likley will gradually rid the body of spike proteins altogether, something to remember for those who might have residual side effects from mRNA vaccine.
Bookmark
Thank you.
bump
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.