Some information about Doug Corrigan.
This is an article that totally debunks ‘Dr’ Corrigan and his theories.
An excerpt from the linked article:
Summary
This is one of the myths that will circulate through the anti-vaxxer community. And everyone will say “look, Doug Corrigan has a Ph.D., so he knows what he’s talking about.” And using confirmation bias, they will ignore all of the other researchers who don’t make these claims.
I have my concerns about the mRNA vaccines, but it has nothing to do with safety and certainly nothing to do with changes in the DNA. I think these vaccines are extraordinarily safe, short- and long-term. However, I don’t think we’ve had adequate time to establish long-term effectiveness, but I’m sure my concerns about that will be allayed as we get more data.
But right now, there is simply no evidence that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines will have any effect on human DNA. These claims lack biological plausibility along with any published evidence.
Doug Corrigan’s claims have no merit and are pure pseudoscience.
Any article that begins with the word “anti-vaxxer” in the first sentence is immediately deemed not science. Keep your propaganda.
I was wondering when someone like you would pipe in on this thread.
To the point I made in an earlier post:
This is not a retrovirus.
We know there are endogenous retroviruses in pretty much every eukaryotic organism. So why have we not found endogenous viruses (which are not retroviruses) populating our genome before now?
I am not saying the author is right or wrong.
“Some information about Doug Corrigan.
This is an article that totally debunks ‘Dr’ Corrigan and his theories.”
Hmmm... “totally debunks” huh?
He references: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33330870/ from December 2020... and https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33958444/ from May of this year.
but, as your article states: “But right now, there is simply no evidence that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines will have any effect on human DNA. These claims lack biological plausibility along with any published evidence.”
You can ignore the published evidence if you like. I prefer to base my conclusions on more than just a few “select” experts.
“I think these vaccines are extraordinarily safe, short- and long-term. However, I don’t think we’ve had adequate time to establish long-term effectiveness, but I’m sure my concerns about that will be allayed as we get more data.“
He “thinks” they are safe, even though we have near 15k deaths reported in the US alone. More than all others combined up until this point in time. But meh, he thinks they are safe.
The last half from the quote above is pure hope. Hope that as he “gets more data” the data will not be bad. Even though the data thus far is not promising at all.
Why should we listen to this person again?
“I think these vaccines are extraordinarily safe, short- and long-term. However, I don’t think we’ve had adequate time to establish long-term effectiveness”
One, those sentences do not belong together. Two, there has never been a “vaccine” with a more abbreviated approval process and rush to get to market. It’s not even close by a factor of at least 5, and often double that.
Last, the deaths from the vaccine are now into 5 figures according to VAERS reporting at the CDC. There are more total deaths from the vaccine than all other vaccine deaths combined in the modern era.
Your claims to not stand up to minor scrutiny.
I followed your link to see who the person was whom you cited as having the credentials to debunk this public person, and I could find no names behind the screen.
Do you have some knowledge of who this Skeptical Raptor is and why an anonymous source should be believed over a named source?
Second question, are you just debunking the doctor who wrote the article or the entire MIT-Harvard research team whose paper is cited by the article written by the doctor?
-PJ
Now do long term effects and side effects
Says an anonymous poster on an obscure internet forum.
And we should take your word for it for what reason again?
You won’t even use your name and expect us to take your word for it?
Your “credentials”?
HA!!!!!!!
Yes. Thank you.
Keep trying. We are off to the coast for a few days...taking a break here..
Every freeper life saved is a vote in the next election.
Florida covid deaths have now surpassed Desantis’
margin of victory. Liberals are celebrating this.
And it galls me even more that the evil people spreading the lies are probably being paid.
https://www.bbc.com/news/blogs-trending-57928647
Yes. After reading the article at biorx that the author Doug “Crash” Corrigan has conflated integration of viral RNA due to a Sars2 infection with the spike protein only RNA of the vaccine.
This study is showing viral RNA integration due to infection, mainly the N gene, not vaccine spike protein RNA.
History is full of examples of things happening that were believed impossible.