Posted on 08/11/2021 9:06:59 AM PDT by ransomnote
[H/T Tatown]
“The authors sought to answer how a PCR test is able to detect segments of viral RNA when the virus is presumably absent from a person’s body. They hypothesized that somehow segments of the viral RNA were being copied into DNA and then integrated permanently into the DNA of somatic cells”
In my previous blog, “Will an RNA Vaccine Permanently Alter My DNA?”, I laid out several molecular pathways that would potentially enable the RNA in an mRNA vaccine to be copied and permanently integrated into our DNA. I was absolutely not surprised to find that the majority of people claimed that this prospect was impossible; in fact, I was expecting this response – partly because most people don’t possess a deep enough understanding of molecular biology, and partly because of other implicit biases.
After all, we’ve been told in no uncertain terms that it would be impossible for the mRNA in a vaccine to become integrated into our DNA, simply because “RNA doesn’t work that way.” Well, this current research which was released not too long after my original article demonstrates that yes, indeed, “RNA does work that way”. In my original article, I spelled out this exact molecular pathway.
Specifically, a new study by MIT and Harvard scientists demonstrates that segments of the RNA from the coronavirus itself are most likely becoming a permanent fixture in human DNA. (study linked below). This was once thought near impossible, for the same reasons which are presented to assure us that an RNA vaccine could accomplish no such feat. Against the tides of current biological dogma, these researchers found that the genetic segments of this RNA virus are more than likely making their way into our genome. They also found that the exact pathway that I laid out in in my original article is more than likely the pathway being used (retrotransposon, and in particular a LINE-1 element) for this retro-integration to occur.
And, unlike my previous blog where I hypothesize that such an occurrence would be extremely rare (mainly because I was attempting to temper expectations more conservatively due to the lack of empirical evidence), it appears that this integration of viral RNA segments into our DNA is not as rare as I initially hypothesized. It’s difficult for me to put a number on the probability due to data limitations present in the paper, but based on the frequency they were able to measure this phenomenon in both petri dishes and COVID patients, the probability is much greater than I initially anticipated. Due to this current research, I now place this risk as a more probable event than my original estimation.
MORE AT LINK
“I think these vaccines are extraordinarily safe, short- and long-term. However, I don’t think we’ve had adequate time to establish long-term effectiveness, but I’m sure my concerns about that will be allayed as we get more data.“
He “thinks” they are safe, even though we have near 15k deaths reported in the US alone. More than all others combined up until this point in time. But meh, he thinks they are safe.
The last half from the quote above is pure hope. Hope that as he “gets more data” the data will not be bad. Even though the data thus far is not promising at all.
Why should we listen to this person again?
“I think these vaccines are extraordinarily safe, short- and long-term. However, I don’t think we’ve had adequate time to establish long-term effectiveness”
One, those sentences do not belong together. Two, there has never been a “vaccine” with a more abbreviated approval process and rush to get to market. It’s not even close by a factor of at least 5, and often double that.
Last, the deaths from the vaccine are now into 5 figures according to VAERS reporting at the CDC. There are more total deaths from the vaccine than all other vaccine deaths combined in the modern era.
Your claims to not stand up to minor scrutiny.
A brand new rapidly developed vaccine... already failing its promises (gonna need a “booster” and you can still get infected)... with reported adverse affects ignored (censored?) by media.
A whole nation (world?) of people are now “lab rats” in this experiment with NO idea of what long term side affects may be. Any who dare to question, much less oppose (Even Sen Dr. Rand Paul) get “fact checked”... or even censored and blocked. Now also accompanied by government and BigTech threats of restrictions and punishments if people do not obediently comply. #Faucism
A brand new rapidly developed vaccine... already failing its promises (gonna need a “booster” and you can still get infected)... with reported adverse affects ignored (censored?) by media.
A whole nation (world?) of people are now “lab rats” in this experiment with NO idea of what long term side affects may be. Any who dare to question, much less oppose (Even Sen Dr. Rand Paul) get “fact checked”... or even censored and blocked. Now also accompanied by government and BigTech threats of restrictions and punishments if people do not obediently comply. #Faucism
ARE WE NOT MEN..!!
Can you imagine the scramble for valid tissue and data by researchers? This has been such a mess that the piles of adequate evidence have been destroyed. It is like the destruction or tampering with a crime scene isn’t it?
The job of sorting wheat and chaff in this investigation has to be nearly impossible. It may be impossible. It must result in many dead ends and twists to the story.
So confusing. However, there are enough red flags against the vaccine that no rational person should ever take it.
Where can I invest in “Tar and feathers”.??
“Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.”
He wasn’t speculating on absence of evidence.
Machiavelli’s “Enemy at the gates” advice. Still sound.
BFL
Early on i said this was a bad science experiment and was very rudely chastized by a handful of the to smart fully vaxxed FR know it alls. Do you think i will get an “i’m sorry”?
The author should have provided links to the actual MIT & Harvard studies
I followed your link to see who the person was whom you cited as having the credentials to debunk this public person, and I could find no names behind the screen.
Do you have some knowledge of who this Skeptical Raptor is and why an anonymous source should be believed over a named source?
Second question, are you just debunking the doctor who wrote the article or the entire MIT-Harvard research team whose paper is cited by the article written by the doctor?
-PJ
Now do long term effects and side effects
He did, but by text of the name and not a hyperlink. He probably meant to create a hyperlink but forgot.
Anyway, I searched for the title and found this link to a PDF of the paper.
SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse-transcribed and integrated into the human genome
-PJ
Could you please explain to your fellow Freepers why Moderator erased your home page?
Old Indian trick.....................
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
(scroll down).........................
A very close friend of mine who just retired as a researcher at UNC Chapel Hill wrote an article stating the same thing.
https://southwritlarge.com/articles/viruses-the-zombies-among-us/
Emeritus Professor of Biochemistry and Biophysics
(PhD – University of Southern California)
RESEARCH SPECIALTY
Allosteric Enzymes: Size, Regulation
PER THE ARTICLE:
“The virus contains an integrase enzyme that allows it to place a viral DNA into the human DNA.”
IT WOULD NOT ALLOW ME TO COPY AND PASTE CONTENT FOR SOME REASON..
No it doesn’t, he states clearly (in both articles) that this is his theory not a fact, and in the second article presents a study that lends credence to the theory.
He uses the word “suggests”, as in it is possible or plausible.
The only way we could know this “for a fact” is to do autopsies on covid deaths, but it seems, after a year and a half, there seems to be no real urgency to finding out what covid (or the vaccine) are doing to the human body. I guess there’s no money in that when you can make millions off a “vax”
As each week rolls by, everything the vax shills touted is going up in flames, and every thing the vax opponents claimed is being validated.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.