[Political Junkie Too]

Just to be clear, and please correct me if I'm wrong, but you posted a "debunk" of a named, credentialed doctor using a site who's author is unnamed and goes by the moniker of Skeptical Raptor?

I followed your link to see who the person was whom you cited as having the credentials to debunk this public person, and I could find no names behind the screen.

Do you have some knowledge of who this Skeptical Raptor is and why an anonymous source should be believed over a named source?

Second question, are you just debunking the doctor who wrote the article or the entire MIT-Harvard research team whose paper is cited by the article written by the doctor?

-PJ

[DugwayDuke]

Political Junkie Too wrote: “I followed your link to see who the person was whom you cited as having the credentials to debunk this public person, and I could find no names behind the screen.”

If you had read the article I linked you would have found two things.
First a technical discussion of why Corrigan is wrong.
Second a review of Corrigan’s credentials which are suspect.