Yes. After reading the article at biorx that the author Doug “Crash” Corrigan has conflated integration of viral RNA due to a Sars2 infection with the spike protein only RNA of the vaccine.
This study is showing viral RNA integration due to infection, mainly the N gene, not vaccine spike protein RNA.
For the layperson, can you expand upon what was conflated?
When I read the article, it seemed to me that the author was speculating on a path that the mRNA "could take" to integrate with the DNA, not that it "did take" such a path.
He then used the MIT-Harvard research into in vitro COVID-19 virus integration into DNA to suggest that such a path was actually possible in humans directly, and likely probable, but that it was a "hole" in the paper that needed further study.
He then speculated that if such path were to be found to be true, that he believed that natural viral encoding into DNA was preferable to engineered mRNA encoding into DNA.
Did I get that summary of the article correct or did you read something else that I missed?
-PJ