Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

From Shots to Clots: Science Shows COVID Vaccines Cause Blood Clots; Clots are microscopic and too small to find on any scan. They can thus only be detected using the D-dimer test
NOQ Report ^ | 08/08/2021 | Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn

Posted on 08/08/2021 4:04:08 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: grey_whiskers

I knew you’d give me homework :)
In the sum-up, the first two, and option number 1 under the third, I think it boils down to risk assessment. Using worse case scenario so far (delta at 1000x or even alpha at 200x reproduction rate) versus (vaccine induced highest rate of reproduction). I’ll watch the Syed video.

the mRNA is going to degrade in a few days and the cells will stop cranking out bits. Cells could be marked for destruction whether vaccine or virus. In the case of the
virus, exploding cells. The only way to avoid cellular damage would be to not get infected.

Which brings us back to risk assessment, which option results in more cellular debris or blood cell distortion? And me going to find the Syed video. Thanks again for the brain exercise!


41 posted on 08/08/2021 10:15:08 PM PDT by blueplum ("...this moment is your moment: it belongs to you... " President Donald J. Trump, Jan 20, 2017) )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The d dimer is a nonspecific marker that is elevated in some clots. It is also elevated in inflammation, age and for others reasons. It is elevated in most people with covid as well. An elevated d dimer is not diagnostic of clotting by any stretch of the imagination


42 posted on 08/08/2021 10:22:38 PM PDT by Mom MD ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ken522

Eliquis doesn’t break down clots: it keeps additional clotting from occurring near the traffic jam of the original clot, while the body either slowly removes the clot, routes around it, or “lays asphalt over it” to restore regular blood flow at the site.


43 posted on 08/08/2021 10:40:52 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD

You forgot cancer.

And you forgot that the Lancet did a meta-study on people bedridden with the coof, showing that 21% or so of them have deep vein thrombosis, as compared to (IIRC) about 3% for other people in hospital beds for awhile; and hip and knee replacement patients are famous for DVT.

Keep waving your hands like the coyote holding up a tiny umbrella to ward off the boulder.


44 posted on 08/08/2021 10:48:57 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: blueplum; ransomnote; Jane Long; bitt; bagster; numberonepal; Cletus.D.Yokel; Cathi

Here, check this one out:

https://gab.com/BeachMilk/posts/106686127755527245

He says:

1) There was a study (Moderna, 2017) where they used lipid microcapsules on influenza and found it crossing the blood-brain barrier.

Different virus, two years before the coof.

2) The Harvard study which showed spike protein throughout the body 24 hours after the jab (you know, 60 picograms/cc of blood ~1 billion spike proteins / cc of blood)?

Guess what else they found?

Nucleocapsid antibodies.

How can there be nucleocapsid antibodies if the nucleocapsid proteins aren’t in the jab?

(Rhetorical, you’d have to, and I don’t know how, rule out prior exposure to the coof, I guess; and precisely match the antibodies found to the various species of virus and therefore of nucleocapsid protein)

3) A paper from 2015 where the CDC warned doctors about how to look out for / treat shedding.

In 2015.


45 posted on 08/08/2021 10:50:59 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

And also, that Canadian Doctor didn’t just measure the d - dimer one time.

He started measuring the d-dimer before the shot and then IIRC, 7 days after the shot. And in at least 60% of the patients there was significant changes.

Indicating the potential hypothesis to be correct, which he will no doubt study additionally, in order to provide more conclusive evidence.


46 posted on 08/09/2021 1:22:56 AM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Shouldn’t they be able to tell the difference between CV19 natural antibodies and those from the INJECTION infection?

https://www.localmemphis.com/article/news/investigations/i-team/memphis-doctor-believed-to-have-died-of-rare-covid-related-syndrome/522-7bb29487-c330-4de4-b1b0-188fe3865e35

Williams recently passed away after being admitted to Baptist East.

“In a year of tragedies, this is one that hits home - particularly with the healthcare community,” said Dr. Stephen Threlkeld, Infectious Disease Specialist. “Barton was an extraordinary guy that was loved by so many family members and friends and was well respected by the medical community.”

Threlkeld said he is working with the CDC, but preliminarily it appears MIS-A is the cause of Williams death. Threlkeld said it is believed Williams previously had an asymptomatic case of COVID.

Threlkeld added, Williams also had been vaccinated for COVID about a month ago and that testing found the two types of antibodies in his system - one type of antibody that results from a natural COVID infection, and a second type of antibody from the vaccine. Threlkeld also said Williams tested negative for COVID-19 while in the hospital.


47 posted on 08/09/2021 1:30:01 AM PDT by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
So, acording to this article, there have been "169 possible cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and 53 possible cases of splanchnic vein thrombosis among 34 million recipients of the [AstraZeneca] vaccine, 35 possible cases of central nervous system thrombosis among 54 million recipients of the Pfizer–BioNTech mRNA vaccine, and 5 possible (but unvetted) cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis among 4 million recipients of the Moderna mRNA vaccine. Six possible cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (with or without splanchnic vein thrombosis) have been reported among the more than 7 million recipients of the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen vaccine.

OK, my addition says that would be 233 people out of 99,000,000 receiving one or another vaccine. The percentage is infinitesimal, something like .000002%

48 posted on 08/23/2021 10:42:43 AM PDT by MrChips ("To wisdom belongs the apprehension of eternal things." - St. Augustine )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson