I knew you’d give me homework :)
In the sum-up, the first two, and option number 1 under the third, I think it boils down to risk assessment. Using worse case scenario so far (delta at 1000x or even alpha at 200x reproduction rate) versus (vaccine induced highest rate of reproduction). I’ll watch the Syed video.
the mRNA is going to degrade in a few days and the cells will stop cranking out bits. Cells could be marked for destruction whether vaccine or virus. In the case of the
virus, exploding cells. The only way to avoid cellular damage would be to not get infected.
Which brings us back to risk assessment, which option results in more cellular debris or blood cell distortion? And me going to find the Syed video. Thanks again for the brain exercise!
Here, check this one out:
https://gab.com/BeachMilk/posts/106686127755527245
He says:
1) There was a study (Moderna, 2017) where they used lipid microcapsules on influenza and found it crossing the blood-brain barrier.
Different virus, two years before the coof.
2) The Harvard study which showed spike protein throughout the body 24 hours after the jab (you know, 60 picograms/cc of blood ~1 billion spike proteins / cc of blood)?
Guess what else they found?
Nucleocapsid antibodies.
How can there be nucleocapsid antibodies if the nucleocapsid proteins aren’t in the jab?
(Rhetorical, you’d have to, and I don’t know how, rule out prior exposure to the coof, I guess; and precisely match the antibodies found to the various species of virus and therefore of nucleocapsid protein)
3) A paper from 2015 where the CDC warned doctors about how to look out for / treat shedding.
In 2015.