Posted on 08/05/2021 7:36:07 AM PDT by David Chase
A CNN team did not let the hot summer weather in Florida get in its way of tracking down a doctor accused of spreading misinformation about COVID-19.
A segment that aired Wednesday night showed all the steps taken to secure an interview with Joseph Mercola, who the New York Times identified as being among a group of "superspreaders of anti-vaccine content" with his online posts, citing researchers and regulators who have scrutinized the information the doctor has shared with his followers.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
I bet you're asking for active links just so you can help have them quashed.
bkmk
“I bet you’re asking for active links just so you can help have them quashed.”
Yes I control the Internet.
Bweeee ha ha ha haaaaar
So you are a cretin.
I used the word “help” — as in, act as an informer.
The Thread was more about Free Speech rather than the vaccine debate.
BTW……..I could make a LinkedIn profile as Lise Johnson and say whatever I want.
Or don’t you know that??
Or don’t you know that??
Yes, I know you are a soulless liar without a conscience.
(Someone else already checked Lise Johnson's LinkedIn and verified her degree and so on.)
The point is…….how do you you know this isn’t the case??
I don’t. Enlighten us please.
Trust me…….if this was winter time…….I could have a field day with y’all.
In fact, I just might.
Your belief threshold is so low as long as it fits your narrative.
Bookmark 💥💥💥
Bookmarking that too💥💥💥
"fact check"
To the non-trolls here, Dr. Karl Denninger has a good fisking here.
Note that he quotes CNN (an "approved" source) who talk about the virus mutating to escape and spread from people who got jabbed.
CNN says:
They write that some variants that have emerged over the past few months "show a reduced susceptibility to vaccine-acquired immunity, though none appears to escape entirely."
But they caution that these variants emerged "before vaccination was widespread," and that "as vaccines become more widespread, the transmission advantage gained by a virus that can evade vaccine-acquired immunity will increase."
And Denninger comments:
A vaccine that is not sterilizing permits the virus to infect you and replicate and as a result you can infect others. Technically it is not a vaccine at all (which by definition prevents infection); it is a prophylactic therapy. Such a "vaccine" instead acts to reduce or eliminate symptomatic disease. You don't know you're sick and you don't get sick. You don't go to the hospital and you don't die. Unfortunately since you don't know you're sick but are infected and the virus is both replicating in you and shedding you are more-likely to spread the infection to others.
All of the current Covid jabs are in this category and so is, for that matter IPV (injected polio vaccine -- the original Salk discovery.) During the original vaccine trials in the summer and fall of 2020 they deliberately did not test any of the recipients for asymptomatic infections. Only a person who developed a significant illness was tested.
This has continued post roll-out with the CDC specifying that a close contact of a known case who was vaccinated did not need to quarantine or be tested until and unless they became symptomatic. They knew damn well, in other words, that the jabs were not sterilizing but did not want that data up for public debate because then those who have read history would be likely to make the connection to the present day and thus they did their level best to hide it. That has now blown up in their face with it being conclusively known that jabbed people in fact not only get infected but spread the virus to others.
Let's unpack your deBOOOOOOOONKing.
1) The CDC says that “there is currently no evidence that any vaccines, including Covid-19 vaccines, cause fertility problems.” This must be the same CDC that talked about "Two weeks to slow the spread." The same CDC that first forbade masks; then required them; then said masks were only needed until the most vulnerable got the jab70% got the jab
Ooops, the jabs don't confer immunity there's a new DELTA VIRUS! Mask up again!
(What's the diameter of a COVID viron compared to the weave in a mask? What to do about the air leaking out the sides & top of the mask, to say nothing of the health effects of wearing a mask 8 hrs/day?)
Where were we again? Oh, that's right, the CDC. Like Faux-Xi recommending Remdesivir , which chews up your kidney.
Harvard pointed out in a study that only about 1% of adverse events get reported to VAERS.
So mewling about lack of data in VAERS isn't going to cut it.
2) In a joint statement, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine also said that “there is no evidence that the vaccine can lead to loss of fertility.”
Oh wait, "currently no evidence."
See above.
3) While fertility was not specifically studied in clinical trials of the vaccines, the statement explains that “no loss of fertility has been reported among trial participants or among the millions who have received the vaccines since their authorization, and no signs of infertility appeared in animal studies. Loss of fertility is scientifically unlikely.”
Oh, that's right. "Absence of Evidence is not evidence of Absence."
Especially if you channel Catbert the Evil HR director from Dilbert and "don't listen to a single complaint."
Scads of women have talked about it; there was one famous study with V-safe a few weeks ago in which it was first reported 80% of the pregnancies were miscarriages; but that's because the study authors were total dorks and allowed, what was it, 3000 of 3900 pregnant women originally enrolled, to become "lost to follow-up" despite a study plan which called for all women to be tracked for 1 year after enrollment in the study.
Almost like someone off-screen had said "Nice study you got there. Be a shame if it happened to endanger the $$$$$ for the jabs."
The only thing I read in your study which even approached rigor, was the point about the spike protein having an amino acid sequence congruent with syncitin...what they should have pointed out is that the detection of antigens usually focuses on amino acid sequences of lengths 8-12; *AND* that the mere presence of a certain sequence, does not mean said sequence will be exposed on the surface of the protein. But they didn't.
Yawns.
I never read your posts. Hope you had fun writing it.
Consider a mood e!evating prescription.
You are always nasty here, to most everyone.
I am betting on depression.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.