Posted on 07/24/2021 6:39:02 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Since COVID-19 arrived, anyone brave enough to go against the preferred narrative has risked their livelihood, career, and even their personal safety. Dr. Scott Atlas, who served on President Trump’s task force and disagreed with Dr. Anthony Fauci, had to hire private security. Stanford University investigated Atlas and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya for their dissenting recommendations.
Now, the Biden administration is threatening to punish people who publish COVID-19 “misinformation,” which they define as anything Dr. Fauci disagrees with (today). This column would turn into a novel if it recounted all the times that man has changed his mind or made an appeal to authority rather than data, as he did recently with Sen. Rand Paul regarding gain-of-function research.
So how long before Emory University gets canceled or has to retract its latest article on long-term recovered immunity? Granted, it is just a reiteration of the assertions of several other researchers and scientists, but at least in the United States, it is still touching the third rail. In an article from the Woodruff Health Sciences Center:
Recovered COVID-19 patients retain broad and effective longer-term immunity to the disease, suggests a recent Emory University study, which is the most comprehensive of its kind so far. The findings have implications for expanding understanding about human immune memory as well as future vaccine development for coronaviruses.
This is not first study to suggest this. A Cleveland Clinic study evaluated COVID-19 infections in 52,238 employees and found:
Specifically, of all infections during the study period, 99.3% occurred in participants who were not infected previously and remained unvaccinated. In contrast, only 0.7% of infections occurred in participants who were not previously infected but were currently vaccinated.
Importantly, not a single incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in previously infected participants with or without vaccination.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
Covid Vaccines: The Good, The Bad, The Ugly.
How to reconcile the two?
Dr. Yeadon has said that those who contracted SARS1 in 2003 have been tested this year with SARS1 and are still immune.
Then those people were tested with SARS2 (Covid) and were immune to that as well. The two viruses have 22% different genomes but are otherwise the same.
“Variants” average about 1% difference from Covid, so there’s no need to fear them or be vaccinated for them.
The Covid test does not identify the virus or the illness, so if someone was ill with other coronaviruses (influenza etc.) they would also have protection.
There are other corona
Antibody levels should’ve been checked prior to jabbing anybody with the vaccine, so this could’ve been tracked and analyzed. As it stands now we have no idea if the vaxxed people catching Covid now had the virus previously before the shot or not.
Bkmk
As a numbers guy, when I start seeing the percentage "99+" in a politically charged issue, I immediately shut off input from that source.
It's just not real.
See my post #7
I also have a less-than-healthy regard for medical professionals when it comes to numbers.
Biology majors rarely have math as a minor or double major...
But they still may quarantine you, i,e, Boris Johnson. Because the powers that be are consumed by power insanity.
Ping
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.