Posted on 07/22/2021 6:25:07 PM PDT by MNDude
Edited on 07/22/2021 11:00:16 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator. [history]
Yes, you should be vaccinated regardless of whether you already had COVID-19. That’s because experts do not yet know how long you are protected from getting sick again after recovering from COVID-19. Even if you have already recovered from COVID-19, it is possible—although rare—that you could be infected with the virus that causes COVID-19 again. Studies have shown that vaccination provides a strong boost in protection in people who have recovered from COVID-19. Learn more about why getting vaccinated is a safer way to build protection than getting infected. Read more at link.
Whoa.....whoa... is this like the 51 FBI agents who signed a sworn affadavit that nothing on the Hunter Laptop from Hell was out of the ordinary?
Are we going to need a vaccine passport to buy a coffin?
what is not being studied is telling, or at least interesting.
1.5 years and no comprehensive or serious look at any repurposed therapeutic.
no serious follow-up on reinfection rates/immunity from infection from those infected early last year.
“That’s because experts do not yet know”
So their confident advice is based on a lack of knowledge. At least they’re confident. That’s because they’re experts.
Q: if I already got the jab, do I need to go out and try to get COVID
“Natural immunity is stronger and provides superior protection from variants”
I would be keenly interested to read the science reports behind your statement please provide the sources of your assertions. All the data coming from Israel who have the highest levels of Mrna relative to total population shows a significantly higher rate of effectiveness for vaccinated vs unvaccinated. They also have multiple peer reviewed titer antibodies studies that show six to.twelve times the killer antibodies levels for Mrna vaxed vs recovered cases. So please provide your sources we would all.benefit from seeing them.
Want to see something that’ll make your jaw drop? Do a web search on mnra vaccines back in 2019. There were a number of articles saying it was an exciting technology that would be available in possibly 5 years, but there were currently a number of issues to overcome.
Less than 2 years later, it’s been injected into a billion people.
Me. I agree. I take Kratom every day. Bypass the antidepressants, anxiety meds, and numerous blood pressure/heart/etc. meds that sit in my cabinet. I very seldom go to the doctor. And, I am physically active, being a landscape artist. Not many 67 year old women do what I do. But bypassing Big Pharma has been good for me. Screw big pharma. Screw the political noise. Which is what this article is.
Just when masks are being trashed and folks feel comfortable being with other people, this hit piece comes out. Who is ruling whom?
How was it the 2nd time?
it isn't a VAX..its altering your genes...not your immune system.....................Do your own DD!!!!!!
I would imagine it can be potentially harmful to have overload of antibodies.
I’m interested in seeing where this thread goes. This has been the CDC FAQ answer for at least six months, probably longer... And it’s a cop out.
What kind of pretzel logic is “take the shot because even though we don’t have much evidence that natural immunity isn’t at least as good as the shot, our unnamed experts don’t know how long natural immunity lasts” ?
Of course there isn’t a lot of direct evidence for lasting COVID-19 natural immunity. It’s a brand new disease. You know what has an even smaller data set over a shorter time frame though? Every one of the various vaccines. Let’s put all the eggs in that basket though then because that comes with government paperwork.
I have no qualms with science, I support people taking the vaccines, especially if they’re in the various elevated risk groups. To pretend that there is no value in having recovered from the disease and relying on an absence of study data that can’t exist yet on this specific disease even though natural immunity is a well studied and well understood general principle of biology for viruses and the short term data indicates that the natural immunity is present and at least durable in the observed time frame for recovered people... That itself goes against science.
LOVE of money is A root of evil.
Always important to get things like that right. Shaitan’s first trick (or at least the first recorded) was a misleading paraphrase of HaShem.
He is way smarter and more experienced than us.
Fauci testified in May that only about 60% of CDC employees had gotten the vaccine. What do they know that we don’t?
what were the issues that were hurdles? presumably they still are hurdles and it was simply deployed anyway.
You are on the wrong forum.
Re: “Experts do not yet know how long you are protected from getting sick again after recovering from COVID-19.”
Experts also do not know how long the experimental vaccines protect you, or, if the experimental vaccines protect you from the ever expanding alphabet of COVID variants.
The key word here is...Experimental.
When a useful vaccine gets full FDA approval, I will get the shot.
We are ruled by liars.
———-
This info video SAYS IT ALL. It should be broadcast on all media. The best
Info piece I have seen in a year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.