Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

UP (Union Pacific) temporarily stopping eastbound container service to Chicago
freightwaves.com ^ | 7-15-21 | Joanna Marsh

Posted on 07/16/2021 12:18:44 PM PDT by dynachrome

Union Pacific is temporarily suspending eastbound service from West Coast port terminals to its Global IV intermodal facility in Chicago to help ease “significant congestion” at inland terminals, especially Chicago, and at the ports. The suspension is aimed at helping ocean carriers reduce backlogs.

UP (NYSE: UNP) hopes this suspension, which will start on Sunday and last for about seven days, will not only help relieve port backlogs for Chicago-bound container traffic but also ultimately help address backlogs for containers destined to other markets.

The suspension applies to UP-served terminals at the ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach and Oakland, California, and Tacoma, Washington.

FreightWaves has been told that the suspension reportedly entails customers shipping IPI 20-foot or 40-foot equipment, not customers using domestic 53-foot equipment.

(Excerpt) Read more at freightwaves.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Society
KEYWORDS: chicago; containertraffic; unionpacific
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last
Shortage of big screen TVs?
1 posted on 07/16/2021 12:18:44 PM PDT by dynachrome
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

What a great idea!


2 posted on 07/16/2021 12:19:47 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Why? Not enough containers to contain things? How temporary is this?


3 posted on 07/16/2021 12:21:30 PM PDT by Richard Axtell (As if.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
Union Pacific is temporarily suspending eastbound service from West Coast port terminals to its Global IV intermodal facility in Chicago to help ease “significant congestion” at inland terminals, especially Chicago, and at the ports. The suspension is aimed at helping ocean carriers reduce backlogs.

Wait, what? Stopping eastbound service from West Coast terminals is supposed to ease congestion with ocean carriers?

Seems to me that containers piling up at West Coast ports would mean that additional ships would be unable to offload, making the ocean carriers even more congested.

4 posted on 07/16/2021 12:22:18 PM PDT by Yo-Yo (is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Wait, what? Stopping eastbound service from West Coast terminals is supposed to ease congestion with ocean carriers?

Yeah, I don’t get it either.

5 posted on 07/16/2021 12:24:23 PM PDT by FatherofFive (We support Trump. Not the GOP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Eastbound and down?......................


6 posted on 07/16/2021 12:27:24 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
I work in supply chain. The intermodal terminal in Chicago is a chronic fustercluck from time to time. I avoid this by paying for slightly more expensive ocean lines who use the Panama Canal and unload on the EAST coast.

You would think that an alternative intermodal terminal would be built in, say, Memphis, Kansas City or St. Louis to compete with Chicago. But, so far, it has never gotten past the talk stages.

7 posted on 07/16/2021 12:27:37 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

More trains would seem to be the answer.


8 posted on 07/16/2021 12:27:46 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Critical Marx Theory is The SOLUTION....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
I used to live next to the UP mainline in Wyoming. 24 hours a day container trains headed east, even during so-called "recessions'. This shutdown is going to have a real ripple effect.

I suppose the problem is that no one wants to work in Chicago, or those who do want to, can't pass drug and background tests. Security is serious business at freight terminals. It's no longer a bunch of louts showing up at "shape up" time, and being hired for the day.

9 posted on 07/16/2021 12:28:45 PM PDT by Governor Dinwiddie ("Success is 10 percent inspiration and 90 percent perspiration." — Thomas Edison)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IOgUaFkpS3Y


10 posted on 07/16/2021 12:29:48 PM PDT by Red Badger (Homeless veterans camp in the streets while illegal aliens are put up in hotels.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

BNSF still to be rolling?


11 posted on 07/16/2021 12:32:57 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Critical Marx Theory is The SOLUTION....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Sounds right. And is there more inventory “shrinkage” in sh*tcongo compared to elsewhere or is it about the same?


12 posted on 07/16/2021 12:37:00 PM PDT by dynachrome ("I will not be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Richard Axtell

“Why? Not enough containers to contain things? How temporary is this?”

For a variety of reasons of every ten containers that arrive in American ports, only four to six are shipped out again. The remainder are causing a huge storage and handling problem. The containers can’t be shipped back empty because the ports don’t have the handling capacity to unload full containers and reload empty containers. The containers, which cost only a few thousand dollars, are essentially, disposable. Except, they are bulky and difficult to move without the right equipment. The equipment that does move them is fully used on full containers. There is no money in moving, handling, storing or reusing old containers. Hence all those articles on using old containers for housing. Again, the problem is moving them.


13 posted on 07/16/2021 12:37:48 PM PDT by Gen.Blather (Wait! I said that out loud? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome; Tilted Irish Kilt; Roman_War_Criminal; Diana in Wisconsin

And the midwest can stop shipments of food to the west coast.

Prepping full steam ahead.


14 posted on 07/16/2021 12:44:23 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith……)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

It’s the left.

Whatever passes for thought processes and logic and reasoning to them comes from an alternate dimension.


15 posted on 07/16/2021 12:45:21 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith……)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Doesn’t make sense, the same number of ships coming in but fewer trains to move the containers. I wonder if their is some other reason they don’t want to mention.


16 posted on 07/16/2021 12:46:22 PM PDT by matt04 ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

This has nothing to with the article, but I’m bored.

Union Pacific stock was trading between $266-269 1/8 on July 16,1929. It high for the year was $271(it would go higher)

Source: Time Union newspaper Brooklyn, NY.

UP stock today $218.65 (last time I looked.)

If I “bought and held.”

Did I make money?


17 posted on 07/16/2021 12:50:18 PM PDT by unclebankster (Globalism is the last refuge of a scoundrel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Can’t “they” put some rechargeable batteries in them [maybe add some vestigial legs] to make them sustainable, green and self mobile?


18 posted on 07/16/2021 12:50:27 PM PDT by Paladin2 (Critical Marx Theory is The SOLUTION....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

Theoretically, there should be no inventory shrinkage because the containers are shipper sealed and are in a guarded terminal. Fedzilla makes sure of this because shrinkage could reduce the duties that they collect and much of the customs clearance work is at a terminal near the destination. Sort of like the George Soros mansion near the city of New York.


19 posted on 07/16/2021 12:50:48 PM PDT by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

That is interesting.

As in “get ready for some shortages” interesting.


20 posted on 07/16/2021 12:51:38 PM PDT by redgolum (If this is civilization, I will be the barbarian. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson