A man's got to watch his piriformis
the pain can often be quite enormous
it effects the sciatica
and hurts quite a bitica
its best to consult a medica.
Posted on 07/11/2021 2:32:54 PM PDT by ransomnote
Why do you think that? Durham has weak knees for the first time in his life?
NF who? /s
mark
At the end of this Part II, Stew Peters brings up the concept of “jabber’s remorse” — to be discussed in Part III.
Psaki Nailed again today by Peter Doocey (FOXNEWS) for “spying” on social media users. A series of hard hitting questions. The room erupted with questions, apparently to helppull her out of the ditch, but Peter came back, over all the clatter, and asked a fourth question.
He was followed up by a leftist cable network who also asked for the names of the 12 people the White House said they had complaints against.
Delicious to see her have her hardest day so far, for a change.
She choked on her own
saliva today, visibly struck by the unusual push back.
Another reporter asked her about Free Speech issues.
The WH ducks by passing the control of speech off of them and lays it upon Private Companies.
SOCIAL MEDIA must be regulated as PUBLISHERS, and soon, if we don’t want to reach the point of Cuba civilians & Venezuelans.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0254635#pone-0254635-g002
database dredge
New Hampshire made all the difference in the 2000 Election.
A ‘mere Colonel?’
mark
A man's got to watch his piriformis
the pain can often be quite enormous
it effects the sciatica
and hurts quite a bitica
its best to consult a medica.
FOLLOW UP ON DR. MARTIN’S INTERVIEW VIDEO by Reiner Fuellmich(German legal beagle preparing to take these perps to court):
https://www.bitchute.com/video/lIUGg5dXHxiQ/
I ran across a blog/summary of some of the highlights:
By Stan Szymanski:
I personally have never consumed video content that is so dense that it must be rewound almost every 15 seconds to truly understand what the speaker is trying to convey to the listener.
The video, ‘A manufactured illusion. Dr David Martin with Reiner Fuellmich 9/7/21 (that is July 9, 2021) is that video.
In this broadcast, Dr. Martin shares publicly available information from the US Patent Office (Public PAIR) that demonstrates what big Pharma knew, when they knew it and the case for RICO.
• M•CAM looked into the gene sequence which had been reported as a ‘novel’ coronavirus and reviewed these against the patent records that were available as of spring 2020.
Over 120 potential pieces of evidence to suggest that the declaration of a novel coronavirus was -entirely false-. There was -no- novel coronavirus.
There are countless, very subtle modifications of sequences that have been uploaded. There was -no- novel coronavirus at all. M•CAM found reports on the patent records of sequences attributed to novelty going back to patents that were sought as early as 1999.
• The first potential ‘vaccine’ for coronavirus was sought by Pfizer January 28, 2000 (US patent 6372224) for the ‘S’-spike protein-the same that they have allegedly rushed into during the ‘pandemic’. This is not new technology. This is something that big pharma has known about and worked with for -20- years…(but the media portrayed as new or ‘novel’)
• Faucci/NAIAD found that the malleability of coronavirus to be a potential candidate for HIV vaccine. SARS is -not- a zoonotic (a disease which can be transmitted to humans from animals) modification of Coronavirus.
In 1999 Faucci funded research at UNC Chappell Hill specifically to create what the NAIAD calls ‘an infectious replication defective coronavirus’. This was specifically targeted for human lung epithelium. IN OTHER WORDS, WE (USA) MADE SARS!!! Patent number 7279327 4/19/02
The patent lays out in specific gene sequencing the fact that we knew the ACE receptor, the ACE2 binding domain, the S1 ‘spike’ protein and other elements that we have come to know as this scourge pathogen was not only engineered but could be synthetically modified in the laboratory using nothing more than gene sequencing technology-taking computer code and turning it into a pathogen or an intermediate of the pathogen.
• The US Patent office found 99.9% of the coronavirus sequence in the public domain. After paying an appeal ‘fine’ in 2006/2007 the CDC overrode the Patent Office rejection of their patent and ultimately got the patent on SARS Coronavirus.
• The CDC says that what they do is in the public interest-that is false as proved by the fact of the alleged ‘bribe’ payed to the US Patent Office in the form of the appeal fine-NOT SUBTLE-The CDC paid an additional fee to keep the application -private-… if the CDC was working in the public interest it would not pay a fee to keep this information -private-.
All of this information is available for public examination at the ‘Public PAIR’ portion of the USPTO website.
• FACT CHECKERS (alleged) have said that SARS CoV-2 is unique and separate from the CDC patent.
The core designation in the gene sequence (CDC patent 2003/2005/2006) states that the CDC gene sequence is a sub-clade of ICTV Taxonomy Clade of SARS CoV-2. In other words, it is a descendant on the same phylogenetic tree.
• On 4/28/2003 Sequoia Pharmaceuticals filed patents regarding anti-viral agents for treatment of and control of infection of Coronavirus …. This was only three -days- after the CDC files a patent for the actual virus…and Sequoia files a patent to treat this virus just 3 days later?
Incredulous. Furthermore, how could Sequoia have known about the virus when the CDC paid to keep it private?
• According to Dr. Martin, this is the definition of criminal conspiracy, racketeering and collusion - this is evidence-RICO!
https://www.encouragingangels.org/new-blog/2021/7/14/02ylny314f3bx6xa5f4efxvgzqomjn
Still not caught up on the thread, but prayer time is approaching.
3:15 eastern
Please take a minute to pray together for our nation.
Compared to where he is now O-10 vs O-6 that is pretty 'mere'.
You will hear people even here on FreeRepublic.com tell us that the 2nd Amendment only applies to government censorship, and that private entities can censor till the cows come home and are not constrained by the 2nd amendment.
But what do those same people say when the Government, in the form of Joe Biden's 'White House', directs those private entities to target censor select citizens?
Would that fall under the 2nd Amendment's purview, ya think?
This is exactly what happens when anti-Americans chip away at the Constitution over years and we allow it with our blubbering justifications and weak-kneed pettifoggery.
(not sure if 'pettifoggery' is the right word, but I sure like saying it)
***UPDATE***
Okay, its the right word.
My money's on the FBI. I despise that outfit more than I can say. In my mind they were once the epitome of intelligent, dedicated, patriotic law enforcement. Now I see them as criminal scum and I hope the entire bureau gets disbanded.
Found it!
Meant 1st right?
How To Steal An Election Uniparty Style
KanekoaTheGreatJuly 16, 2021
“How to steal an election,” Uniparty style
“Over time, the [political establishment, Big Tech, Big Media] systematically
consolidated its domination over politics, turning elections from a
democratic contest into a controlled system that delivered regime victories.”
https://telegra.ph/How-To-Steal-An-Election-Uniparty-Style-07-16
~Easy
Given the events of the last day, we should re-label Jan-6 as a civil rights protest.
Works for the CBC.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.