Vaccine propaganda and injection indecision: Which is worse, the disease or the cure?

American Thinker ^ | 07/03/2021 | Jack Gleason

[SeekAndFind]

How do you make decisions in our new internet world?  Most of us just go to Google and type in the question: "Is it safe to get the COVID-19 vaccine?"  The overwhelming response is "Yes!"

Every entry below has the same strangely similar results.  "Side effects are minor and common."  "Side effects are a sign that your vaccine is working properly."

When you visit YouTube and do the same search, again, you see a consistent theme.  "The risk from the COVID outweigh the risks from the vaccines," and "vaccine side effects are actually a good thing."

Check for yourself.

But when you go to an uncensored video website like Bitchute.com or Rumble.com, you see a totally different result: scores of doctors and scientists warning about the danger from the shots, and hundreds of videos from real people who have had horrific side effects from their injections, and most were at extremely low risk for dying from COVID.

You are now presented with a dilemma: "whom do I trust with this potentially life-altering decision?  Which is worse, the disease or the cure?"

Ask yourself, which is more likely in our new world where government officials, news media, and social media have all teamed up to present only one side of an issue? 

When were the first incidences of information and videos being "fact-checked" and removed? When were the first cases of websites actually being "de-platformed"? When, in our history, have doctors and scientists been pressured, vilified, and even fired from their jobs for expressing their honest opinions about the most important disease facing our planet?

When were the first incidences of information and videos being "fact-checked" and removed?  When were the first cases of websites actually being "de-platformed"?  When, in our history, have doctors and scientists been pressured, vilified, and even fired

[Republican Wildcat]

Oh I agree completely. I am pro-vaccine, and feel that all Americans should feel safe and confident in taking them. But no one should ever be forced to take any medical treatment they oppose.

Absolutely agree. And not everyone should or can take them - the ingredients can cause serious allergic reactions for some people, just like any treatment. And children probably shouldn't be taking them - at least not at the same dose as adults.

[SeekAndFind]

RE: Yeah, like the “real people” who claim magnets / metal objects stick to their faces and other parts of their ...

Don’t make this the rule. These are the sensationalistic exceptions.

Look at the testimonies of well known researchers like the pioneer of mRNA vaccines and others and you’ll get a better idea of why many are still hesitant.

[Republican Wildcat]

Do we really need a vaccine for a virus with a greater than 99% survival rate?

The people who may spend the rest of their lives regularly gasping for air, have colostomy bags, etc. and who spent many days if not weeks extremely ill, spent time in the hospital, the ICU, etc. would have probably preferred getting the jab vs. going through all of that even though they "survived." That's a totally bogus argument.

Why are they trying to SELL this Fake Vaccine so hard to the masses?

Because since apparently you did not notice, there was a pandemic that needed to be curbed. When viruses lose hosts, it has no where to go, and it dies down...and that's what happened. The vaccine certainly isn't fake, either.

I could go on, but.

I'm sure you could - and it would all be just as inaccurate as the rest. It's way past time for reality to set in.

[Republican Wildcat]

Don’t make this the rule. These are the sensationalistic exceptions.

It is the rule, unfortunately. People like you who try to have a rational conversation are the exception.

[SeekAndFind]

We have to disagree.

There are MANY MORE videos of doctors and researchers who present their scientific concerns about the vaccines.

These are not anti-vaxxers, these are those who OBJECT to forcing people into taking the vaccines without informed consent who present VALID DATA.

It was such loud concerns that at least caused the CDC to bring out the caveats about potential adverse side effects to those considering taking the shot.

The more social media censor such videos, the more a large number of people get suspicious.

The best remedy against disinformation is BETTER INFORMATION. REBUT THE OBJECTIONS, WITH SCIENCE, not censorship.

Unfortunately, such is not forthcoming.

Pointing out the antivax kooks out there isn’t helping either. Most people know the difference between sensationalism and sober data.

[delta7]

The good news is we have those for the vaccines, so they are one thing in life we can be certain of their safety and efficacy.
————-
Today’s vaccines are not yesterday’s vaccine. Everything today has been corrupted, from .gov to media to corporations- MRNA is sinister, the push for jabs is sinister, everything about the Covid flu “ management “ is sinister.

[SheepWhisperer]

There’s a cure?
Who knew?

[SeekAndFind]

RE: There’s a cure? Who knew?

What do you call the over 99.99% of those who got infected and recovered?

What do you consider Donald Trump ( as one example ) to be?

[Jan_Sobieski]

If you’re wavering, get Johnson. Not even a sore arm

Short Term: Not even a sore arm

Long Term: ADE.

This is what trust in Government gets you, combined with myopic thinking

[SheepWhisperer]

Oh I misunderstood your post.
I thought you were implying that the experimental shots were the cure.

Yes, natural recovery is the cure

My bad

[eyeamok]

It's way past time for reality to set in.

I Agree, call me when the Death Rate rounded is above 0%, because for the under 50 crowd the Death Rate is 0 % rounded.

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "(metal objects stick) "doctors" who make statements that anyone with a middle school level of biology knows are false"
yet here it is
https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Aluminum-cation

[Steve Van Doorn]

said, "would have probably preferred getting the jab"
Why?

Peer-reviewed research from @TheLancet shows that the experimental vaccines reduce your chance of catching COVID-19 by:
Pfizer: 0.8%
Johnson & J: 1.2%
Moderna: 1.2%
AstraZeneca: 1.3%
So, basically NO prevention, no immunity and no antibodies
https://archive.vn/4O1PI

[Allegra]

Why are they trying to SELL this Fake Vaccine so hard to the masses?

Yep. The aggressive campaign by the media to get this shot is what has me questioning it.

[Lowell1775]

OHIO PING!
Please let me know if you want on or off the Ohio Ping list.

Vaccine propaganda and injection indecision: Which is worse, the disease or the cure?
American Thinker ^ | 07/03/2021 | Jack Gleason
Posted on 7/3/2021, 7:23:28 PM by SeekAndFind