Vaccine propaganda and injection indecision: Which is worse, the disease or the cure?

American Thinker ^ | 07/03/2021 | Jack Gleason

[SeekAndFind]

How do you make decisions in our new internet world?  Most of us just go to Google and type in the question: "Is it safe to get the COVID-19 vaccine?"  The overwhelming response is "Yes!"

Every entry below has the same strangely similar results.  "Side effects are minor and common."  "Side effects are a sign that your vaccine is working properly."

When you visit YouTube and do the same search, again, you see a consistent theme.  "The risk from the COVID outweigh the risks from the vaccines," and "vaccine side effects are actually a good thing."

Check for yourself.

But when you go to an uncensored video website like Bitchute.com or Rumble.com, you see a totally different result: scores of doctors and scientists warning about the danger from the shots, and hundreds of videos from real people who have had horrific side effects from their injections, and most were at extremely low risk for dying from COVID.

You are now presented with a dilemma: "whom do I trust with this potentially life-altering decision?  Which is worse, the disease or the cure?"

Ask yourself, which is more likely in our new world where government officials, news media, and social media have all teamed up to present only one side of an issue? 

When were the first incidences of information and videos being "fact-checked" and removed? When were the first cases of websites actually being "de-platformed"? When, in our history, have doctors and scientists been pressured, vilified, and even fired from their jobs for expressing their honest opinions about the most important disease facing our planet?

When were the first incidences of information and videos being "fact-checked" and removed?  When were the first cases of websites actually being "de-platformed"?  When, in our history, have doctors and scientists been pressured, vilified, and even fired

[eyeamok]

Up until December 2019, Herd Immunity was Officially Defined by the CDC as a Combination of Vaccinated and Natural Immunity by those recovered. Why did it Change quietly with NO valid reason??

Do we really need a vaccine for a virus with a greater than 99% survival rate?

Why are they trying to SELL this Fake Vaccine so hard to the masses?

I could go on, but.

[Bonemaker]

If you’re wavering, get Johnson. Not even a sore arm.

[Nuc 1.1]

No jab. No how.

[SeekAndFind]

If you knew there were truly safe and effective treatments for COVID, and even safe and effective preventative measures you and your family members could take, the whole issue goes away. You won’t need the shot, and the “Emergency Use Authorization” for the vaccine injections would be no longer valid.

But if you go to your same sources and type “hydroxychloroquine” or “ivermectin,” you get a response dated Nov. 9, 2020: “A National Institutes of Health clinical trial evaluating the safety and effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine for the treatment of adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has formally concluded that the drug provides no clinical benefit to hospitalized patients” and “WHO ‘strongly’ against hydroxychloroquine use for COVID-19.” For ivermectin, you get articles on “Why You Should Not Use Ivermectin to Treat or Prevent COVID-19.”

Check for yourself.

However, If you go to Bitchute with the same question, you are presented with the banned videos from America’s Frontline Doctors explaining their experience with using HCQ and ivermectin to prevent and cure COVID. Rumble shows videos about studies from doctors and scientists about how effective they are.

[roving]

Woe to anyone endangering the salvation of others.

https://www.health.com/condition/vaccines/johnson-and-johnson-fetal-cells-vaccine

Johnson & Johnson vaccine are called PerC6 cells. “These are retinal cells that came from a fetus that was aborted in 1985 in the Netherlands

[week 71]

I read this article a few hours ago. I considered it an angle to consider. I will not take the Jab as I am young enough that the risk-benefit analysis dictates it would be foolish. Decided for the most part last year, even before they started administering it. Seems folks would do well to hear both sides and choose - the article rightly suggests that the majority of mainstream sources restrict one side of qualified opinions. Cheers

[Renfrew]

How do you find out what is True? It’s a hard question. There is Biblical truth, but that only helps with some issues.

For others there is Scientific Truth. There are also many things science can’t prove, but for some few things we do have highest possible level of scientific proof: double blinded controlled studies.

The good news is we have those for the vaccines, so they are one thing in life we can be certain of their safety and efficacy.

[Renfrew]

“Do we really need a vaccine for a virus with a greater than 99% survival rate?”

Let’s say it has a 99.5% survival rate. That means if 50% of Americans get COVID there will be 800,000 deaths. Doesn’t preventing that many Americans from dying justify a vaccine?

[eyeamok]

What if they all took Ivermectin regularly?

[week 71]

Odd premises. One can consider, as a liberty-loving American on this July 4th weekend, that they all know the vaccine is available and if consequences are harsh (for either side) than so be it. Unfortunately many never knew of potential consequences for reasons the article suggests. Hoping the vaccines work for the long haul - I personally think we will find out this fall. There appears to be many adverse reactions even if it does work. RISK-BENEFIT analysis.

[Macoozie]

“justify a vaccine?”

The development and existence of a vaccine is neutral. Good, bad, indifferent.

Forcing folks to get it is the issue.

Don’t mix the two.
As bad as the bogus “Immigration” vs ‘Illegal Immigration” construct foisted by The Left.

[Steve Van Doorn]

This group waiting in line for their injection CLEARLY believes the disease is worse

Video shows a group of people waiting in line for the injection. A medical group rolls out a man that just got the shot shaking on a stretcher. no one leaves the line to get their injection.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/HShbwQnUDeZl/

[SkyDancer]

Rather have the flu virus because when it’s over it’s over; the genetic modifiers masquerading as a vaccine stays in your system forever modifying all sorts of things inside.

[Renfrew]

Oh I agree completely. I am pro-vaccine, and feel that all Americans should feel safe and confident in taking them.

But no one should ever be forced to take any medical treatment they oppose.

[bgill]

No one ever said the vax was a cure.

[Lowell1775]

Ping

[Republican Wildcat]

and hundreds of videos from real people who have had horrific side effects from their injections

Yeah, like the "real people" who claim magnets / metal objects stick to their faces and other parts of their body after supposedly taking the vaccines...and "doctors" who make statements that anyone with a middle school level of biology knows are false.

[Republican Wildcat]

Oh I agree completely. I am pro-vaccine, and feel that all Americans should feel safe and confident in taking them. But no one should ever be forced to take any medical treatment they oppose.

Absolutely agree. And not everyone should or can take them - the ingredients can cause serious allergic reactions for some people, just any treatment. And children probably shouldn't be taking them - at least not at the same dose as adults.

[Republican Wildcat]

the genetic modifiers masquerading as a vaccine stays in your system forever modifying all sorts of things inside.

More embarrassing nonsense. Can it get more absurd? Of course...and it probably will.