Posted on 06/30/2021 10:00:38 AM PDT by JonPreston
PHILADELPHIA — Pennsylvania’s highest court overturned Bill Cosby’s sex assault conviction Wednesday after finding an agreement with a previous prosecutor prevented him from being charged in the case.
Cosby has served more than two years of a three- to 10-year sentence at a state prison near Philadelphia.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...
We need to release all the law breakers.
We will need that space in the prisons to house all the Conservatives that will soon fill the joint up.
I have mixed feeling about this. First, most of these cases where women were “taken advantage of” involves the woman consenting 95% of the way. If you get to the point that a person can drug you, you are more than mildly culpable.
I don’t go for this “I said ‘no,’” after the pants come off. You are the author of your sexual destiny, unless someone abducts you off the street and forcibly rapes you.
russell the snitch should be worried.
Democrats take care of their own.
Republicans rot in jail.
“If you get to the point that a person can drug you, you are more than mildly culpable.”
Soooo, just entering a party and getting a drink, then?
That’s our Supreme Court here in the state of PA five to two Democrats and non-believers in election fraud for the political side of the story.
Drugging people is wrong, M’kay?
He can now feed Biden his Jello pudding.
“The state Supreme Court on Wednesday found that an agreement with a previous prosecutor prevented him from being charged for allegedly drugging and molesting Andrea Constand in 2004.”
An agreement is an agreement.
“Originally, the trial judge had allowed just one other accuser to testify at Cosby’s first trial. However, after the jury deadlocked, the judge then allowed five other accusers to testify at Cosby’s retrial.”
So, the jury was deadlocked, so the judge allowed accusers from the 80s after the fact.
Sounds like the Prosecutor did a piss poor job.
A party in the Playboy mansion in the confines of a bedroom...
But if a drug has to introduced to the scenario, it would indicate he knew it wasn't going to happen without it.
Agree
Ah, no. There have been several cases where dudes paid the bartender to ‘roofie’ any unattached attractive woman that came in, or where they *were* the bartender.
While him and Hunter compare notes......................
I’ve thought about that, too. Used to be, many women that were assaulted wouldn’t come forward and press charges. Now, there are any number of women who will have consensual sex and then play the “litigation lottery” or make downright false accusations for political gain, money, or just vindictiveness, and they have NO shame....
Free as a bird, guilty as sin...................
America’s Dad.
What a creep.
Drugging people is wrong, M’kay?
LOL, South Park did a hillarious take-off of “Fat Albert”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCVM4gwnGjI
“See you next time, eat da pudding!”
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.