Coronavirus PING!
Posted on 06/30/2021 2:42:10 AM PDT by SecAmndmt
Even a robot programmed to “follow the science” would throw up his hands in despair while reading the latest FDA COVID pronouncement.
After untold numbers of people have been given antibody tests to determine their COVID status, the FDA now states:
“Today, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued a safety communication informing the public that results from SARS-CoV-2 antibody tests should not be used to evaluate immunity or protection from COVID-19 at any time, and especially after the person received a COVID-19 vaccination.”
Boom.
(...)
(Excerpt) Read more at blog.nomorefakenews.com ...
Dr. Yeadon, former Chief Science Officer for Pfizer’s Allergy and Infectious Diseases division, said that a researcher located those who’d had SARS1 in 2003 and tested them this year, with that original SARS1 virus. Those people were still immune, after 17 years.
The researcher then tested those people with SARS2 (Covid). Those people were immune. There is ‘only’ a 22% difference in the genomes between Sars1 and Sars2 and so immunity held.
But note those ill in 2003 did not maintain active antibodies for 17 years. Their immune sytem hibernated those (my words) antibodies until it recognized the pathogen from years ago and began producing antibodies.
There are two wings to the immune system and Big Pharma is focusing on ‘active antibodies’ as if that is an accurate indicator of immunity. It actually means ‘activated immunity’, when you may have immunity but haven’t been exposed in so long you don’t have the antibodies.
Dr. Yeadon says the ‘variants’ are no more than 1% or 2% different from Covid and those who’ve had Covid will be immune to the variants.
The Deep State just wants a repeat performance, They want to put us through the lockdowns and panic as if it never happened before; they like the way we obeyed and want to see it again. :(
Because when they define “long lived” they state it is 7 months, as opposed to the 2 or 3 months from other Coronaviruses.
BTTT!
Not a full story, but of providing more than 3 sentences by including what the FDA actually said, which is less than 100 words, and which is how many words are shown in excerpts on the list of articles. For those of us who skim the article page (set at 250 myself) then the 100 word excerpt (besides the title) can tell us if it is worth reading more of. And likewise the excerpt on the actual posted page (300 words normally allowed unless the article is small, and 100 for most protected sites, aside from the few "link only") helps save time if it includes the meat of the article.
Sorry to criticize you though, as that blog article is only about 500 words.
Ok
No - that is wrong.
Long lived is long term.
Can you quote the section that leaves you with that impression?
Coronavirus PING!
This is the antibody test, not the vaccine.
It’s all about the shot™
Never about health 😥
That wasn't their point. They actually included the qualifier "...especially after the person received a COVID-19 vaccination.” They are saying antibodies don't mean you are immune. It's BS. It's fear mongering. While technically right, in practice, yes, yes they do mean you are immune, unless you are immunodeficient. It's like saying a baseball team scoring 50 points in a game doesn't mean the team will win. In reality, yes, it does mean they win. But technically it doesn't.
Therefore, our test results show that vaxxines don’t really work. There is protection with cases of a history of natural infection, however.
Exactly how I read it, as well.
Maybe these govt agencies will reverse themselves right off a cliff.
Always reversing, revising, simply to fit their agenda/goals.
************************************************************************************
When PHARMA applied for their EUA, they did not claim it would prevent the coof. They claimed it would help the symptoms.
Below is the Moderna/CDC disclosure read to a recipient:
1. There is no FDA approved Vaccine to prevent CV-19.
2. Long term protective efficacy is unknown.
3. Clinical trials are still going on.
4. It is therefore not known whether a vaccine recipient who is exposed to CV-19 will get violently ill or have no symptoms.
In addition, the representative confirmed to a lady calling to report her adverse reaction, that Guillain-Barré syndrome was being reported by other recipents.
“... if the test used does not detect the type of antibodies induced by the vaccine.”
I get that, but it is all done to “follow the science”!
My Governor’s favorite phrase, and just today finally “opened up” Washington State.
Also, please note that the FDA is not the producer or manufacturer of the tests, either for :
(#1)diagnostic (determine the level of infection), or
(#2)screening of active, or even asymptomatic individuals.
Rather, the FDA relies on "Test developers (who) gather evidence to support their test's use and submit this evidence to the FDA.
When the FDA issues an emergency use authorization (EUA) for a test, it means that the FDA reviewed scientific and clinical evidence to determine
that the test may be effective when used as authorized, such as to diagnose individuals with SARS-CoV-2."
Under emergency conditions, one wonders how thorough the FDA evaluated "the scientific and clinical evidence" of either the testing,
or the actual vaccination jab in their rush to get both out into the population.
According to my understanding, the clinical trials for the vaccine was approximately 2 months; I have no information about the length of clinical testing trials.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.