Posted on 06/28/2021 6:06:02 AM PDT by McQ444
Attorney Sidney Powell has discussed what she believes are the potential steps in the event of it being proven the election was stolen. During an interview on Lindell TV with conservative “Frank” host Brannon Howse, Powell said: “I think it’s certainly important for people to understand what happened here, and the more information we can get about that, the better,” Powell said.
(Excerpt) Read more at nnettle.com ...
At least Powell isn’t cowering in some hidden corner.
She has more guts than that gutless, except for his large GUT and ASS, Bill Barr (SPIT!).
Exactly. The electors boat sailed January 6. The audits are to document the fraud and how it was done, and point us towards ways to prevent it in future elections.
More likely they know she can’t prove anything and want to humiliate her for it.
Over 6 months since she promised to release the Kraken and there have been zero Krakens released. Time for her to put up or shut up.
“No Constitutional way to remove a sitting President except impeachment and conviction.”
People keep saying that - but there are PLENTY of things that could result in his removal - and nobody would question the Constitutionality for a second.
Let’s start with some less likely ones - just to make the point.
1. If he stripped down and started playing with himself on live TV...
2. If he turned out to be an alien lizard creature with a Biden skin suit…
3. If he chopped up Jill and tossed her body parts off the WH roof…
Well, you get the point… there ARE limits to what the American people will stand for - at which point questions of Constitutionality become moot.
I would say clear proof of a stolen election is one of those limits.
If the proof is convincing enough that President Trump was the rightful winner, then Biden would have to step down. Period.
To look at it another way, let’s say you broke into the house of a bank CEO, and kicked him and his family out on the street.
Now, we know there are strict foreclosure laws that govern a bank’s ability to take possession of a house. Would the bank CEO need to follow those foreclosure laws? Hell no.
And President Trump wouldn’t need to follow Constitutional procedure for the removal of a sitting POTUS. If he can convince the American people that he won - then HE is the POTUS, and the Constitution is on HIS side.
I’m not saying it is possible to convince the public he won - so many are hopelessly brainwashed - I’m just saying that’s the key to it all - convince the American people the election was stolen, and Constitutional process won’t be an issue.
If the Constitution had been followed, President Trump would be in the White House right now - it is absurd to argue that the Constitution would somehow prevent the rightful winner from assuming office.
No, they don't...certainly not for a closed election that is now in the past.
Not a word of that is true.
You are wrong and the fact that there is an eighteen month period for recounting shows how wrong you are. There would be no reason for a recount time frame if there was nothing possible when fraud is uncovered. Try a different deception at FR.
It is entirely true.
If the American people believe the President is illegitimate - he is out of there - and Constitutional process technicalities are not going to protect him.
And the converse is also true.
If the American people believe the President is legitimate - he will remain - and no Constitutional process technicality will be enough to remove him.
Want proof? Barack Obama is the proof.
Technically, according to the Constitution, he was not eligible. Yet, he served 8 years.
Why? Because there was insufficient popular support for disqualifying him.
Want more proof? Donald Trump.
He won the 2020 election, and yet Joe Biden got sworn in.
Why? Because there was insufficient popular support for the notion that the Democrats stole the election.
Unfortunately, the force of public opinion is more deterministic of political outcomes than is strict adherence to Constitutional process.
If enough people are convinced that Biden is there illegitimately, he won’t be able to withstand the pressure to pack up his things and go back to wherever.
I doubt that many people can be convinced, but if they were - he would certainly be forced to step down - and it wouldn’t require any fancy Constitutional legalities - it would be like booing someone off the stage.
Enough booing is all it takes - you don’t need force or legalities.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.