Because they bought 2.
“Then why are we overloading low risk people and children with TWO?!”
********************************************************************
Well, for one thing, this study of working healthcare workers likely includes few, if any, elderly or folks with low functioning immune systems. The 95% efficacy rate, for two doses, found in the large mRNA vaccine trials included large numbers of those populations.
BTT
But your point is well taken for children and healthy young people. I think the federal bureaucracy gets confused when they move away from “one size fits all” approaches.
Vaccine effectivness most likely related to PCR testing no longer being valid.
Because we know that "scientists" and "journalists" are all as pure as the driven snow...
I mean, if you can't trust "scientists" and "journalists" who CAN you trust?
.
In other news, "Soviet Grain Harvest Smashes Record!"
(While millions starve to death)
This doesn’t sound right.
You can’t prove a negative.
Besides, out of 109 cases...whee=whooo big numbers...39[or whatever] got infected with 1 shot and the rest had no shot.
That is not 95%.
They are trying awful damn hard to push this crap...too hard.
How do they control for this study? Back in ye olden thymes if one kid got the mumps or measles they’d throw all the kids into the same room so everyone would catch it at the same time, and end the outbreak quickly.
That’s sort of the only way to prove it works. Put everyone into a room with infected people, see who fares better.
All the rest, many possible external uncontrolled biases. Maybe some actually built into the trial. Maybe a fair number kept lots of precautions. Lots of sanitization. Maybe segregated by clinic type where exposure for most health workers was minimal. Who was “locked down” more? Who just went to work where they sprayed and temperature checked all those who made contact (thus minimizing risk of exposure), and then back home and virtually nowhere else, thus avoiding infected people? How many were taking a drug/mineral cocktail in addition to the vaccine?
On the surface it seems to be helping but I consider myself science minded, and there are a lot of possible other reasons for these results.
Even Dr. Fauci said it put him out for at least 24 hours. Sounds like OD...
So a 5% infection rate? Isn’t that pretty much the same chance of getting COVID?
A point to consider: most healthcare workers already have strong immune systems because they come in contact with lots of patients.
*snork* *guffaw!*
Without a booster your immune system will forget.
If your immune system only sees something once it will dismiss it as a one-off and forget about it after awhile.
If it sees something twice it will upgrade it to a danger to keep a permanent lookout for.
This is also why natural immunity may fade quickly.
and they proved this how? exposure to known cases???
The overall push of these jabs is insane and bizarre.
The author of this article was great in Wake Island.
Yeah 95% if you get the shot 94% if you don’t, your taking the risk for that 1%.
Just exactly how do they come up with those numbers?
What research was done to determine that?
Oh wait, liberal propaganda accepted as truth because it’s liberal propaganda. My bad.