This doesn’t sound right.
You can’t prove a negative.
Besides, out of 109 cases...whee=whooo big numbers...39[or whatever] got infected with 1 shot and the rest had no shot.
That is not 95%.
They are trying awful damn hard to push this crap...too hard.
“This doesn’t sound right. You can’t prove a negative.”
How this trial worked is of 4000 medical staff 3400 were dosed and 600 were not.
Of the 3400, 39 (1.1%) of them got Covid. Of the 600, 107 (17.8%) of them tested positive.
Some simple math (1.1/17.8) shows the vaccine reduced the cases by 93.6%.
This doesn’t sound right.
You can’t prove a negative.
Besides, out of 109 cases...whee=whooo big numbers...39[or whatever] got infected with 1 shot and the rest had no shot.
That is not 95%.
They are trying awful damn hard to push this crap...too hard.
Another skewed ‘report’....similar to this one....
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3968412/posts
They’re purposely using SMALL number groups to try to prove their experimental-shots-are-great”, false point.
Do they really think people can’t figure their fuzzy math out??
No Sale.
...”They are trying awful damn hard to push this crap...too hard.”
And they are totally blowing what little credibility they have remaining - if that is measurable.
Happy to read (in this thread) that the PCR testing got the credit it deserved; zero as a diagnostic tool.