Posted on 05/22/2021 2:26:11 AM PDT by ransomnote
I just read through the PBS article posted here:
The powerful technology behind the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines
PBS ^ | April 2, 2021 | Isabella Isaacs-Thomas
The medical oligarchs must be panicking to start this kind of whitewash so late in the game and it's too little, too late, after too many lies. The weaponized CDC never bothered to tell the public anything, because their tyranny is less complicated if the public is completely unaware of what they are doing.
The weaponized CDC intentionally chose the wrong companies to produce the vaccines. Those who are sensitive about my use of 'weaponized' may want to argue instead that the CDC was merely being incompetent.
The following excerpt describing the CDC's 'top choices' for production of the 'vaccines' is taken from Christian Eliot's article titled 18 Reasons I Won't Be Getting a Covid Vaccine (deconstructingconventional.com)
The four major companies who are making these covid vaccines are/have either:
Never brought a vaccine to market before covid (Moderna and Johnson & Johnson).
Are serial felons (Pfizer, and Astra Zeneca).
Are both (Johnson & Johnson).
Moderna had been trying to "Modernize our RNA" (thus the company name)--for years, but had never successfully brought ANY product to market--how nice for them to get a major cash infusion from the government to keep trying.
In fact, all major vaccine makers (save Moderna) have paid out tens of billions of dollars in damages for other products they brought to market when they knew those products would cause injuries and death--see Vioxx, Bextra, Celebrex, Thalidomide, and opioids as a few examples.SNIP:
Johnson & Johnson has lost major lawsuits in 1995, 1996, 2001, 2010, 2011, 2016, 2019 (For what it's worth, J&J's vaccine also contains tissues from aborted fetal cells, perhaps a topic for another discussion)
Pfizer has the distinction of the biggest criminal payout in history. They have lost so many lawsuits it's hard to count. You can check out their rap sheet here. Maybe that's why they are demanding that countries where they don't have liability protection put up collateral to cover vaccine-injury lawsuits.
Astra Zeneca has similarly lost so many lawsuits it's hard to count. Here's one. Here's another...you get the point. And in case you missed it, the company had their covid vaccine suspended in at least 18 countries over concerns of blood clots, and they completely botched their meeting with the FDA with numbers from their study that didn't match.
Oh, and apparently J&J (whose vaccine is approved for "Emergency Use" in the US) and Astrazenca (whose vaccine is not approved for "Emergency Use" in the US), had a little mix up in their ingredients...in 15 million doses. Oops.
FReeper Grey_Whiskers found bankruptcy filings for Moderna which indicated they were over a billion dollars in debt. Yes, ladies and gentlemen, these were the CDC's standout 'winners' with which to experiment on the world.
There are many examples of CDC incompetence, if one can't accept that they are serving the interests of our enemies. Surely the world hasn't entirely forgotten that, after whipping up fear about Covid-19, the CDC raced to produce millions of contaminated Covid-19 tests.
C.D.C. Labs Were Contaminated, Delaying Coronavirus Testing, Officials Say
"Early on, the F.D.A., which oversees laboratory tests, sent Dr. Timothy Stenzel, chief of in vitro diagnostics and radiological health, to the C.D.C. labs to assess the problem, several officials said. He found an astonishing lack of expertise in commercial manufacturing and learned that nobody was in charge of the entire process, they said.
Problems ranged from researchers entering and exiting the coronavirus laboratories without changing their coats, to test ingredients being assembled in the same room where researchers were working on positive coronavirus samples, officials said. Those practices made the tests sent to public health labs unusable because they were contaminated with the coronavirus, and produced some inconclusive results.
In a statement on Saturday, a spokeswoman for the F.D.A., Stephanie Caccomo, said, “C.D.C. did not manufacture its test consistent with its own protocol.”"
So if experience, brilliance and integrity were not used to select Moderna and Pfizer, what was the criteria which ended up selecting these two inappropriate choices for 'America's Experiment on Humans?'
Reading the PBS article, one can be forgiven for believing that the 'powerful' technology succeeded. Sadly, one would be wrong.
Through the miracles of deflection and editorial prowess, the PBS article conceals the fact that the mRNA vaccines are built on failed technology that never made it past animal trials because, well, 100% the animals (cats) in the 2005 and 2012 survived vaccination, acquired antibodies and the died when exposed to the virus.
I was chastised for overlooking mouse trials. I located material on mRNA mousetrials and learned that all the mice were sacrificed (killed) two days after exposure to Covid so that scientists could examine their lungs for signs of Covid-19. (hint: mouse lungs contained heavy infection).
The last time a vax hawker claimed there were successful animal trials marked the breaking point for my patience on this iterative subject. I demanded they provide links to successful human or animal trials prior to the Covid-19 'vaccine rollout' or concede that there are none. No link was forthcoming. All researchers I read/watch say there is none. Links or it didn't happen.
The current lipid coating PBS is excited about is suspected by some to be highly toxic. If so, it might help explain the unacceptable levels of reactions like anaphylaxis, death etc. observed following vaccination.
If it comforts anyone to know, the CDC claims it reviews all the deaths in VAERS to see if any of the deaths following vaccination were caused by the 'vaccines' or if they arose from other conditions and circumstances.
More realistic persons will want to note that the CDC, for the first time ever, utilized FDA doctors lacking needed training and experience, whom it did not identify by name, to 'review' the medical content in a private period of time deemed far too short to be feasible, according to Dr. Peter McCullough and others.
COVID Vaccine Killing Huge Numbers, Warns Leading Doctor – Liberty Sentinel [32 minute video]
PBS is demonstrating malevolent journalism when it distorts the failed history of the mRNA 'vaccines' saying, "...— are the first of their kind to be used at this scale, this historic moment would not be possible without the decades of research that came before it."
The mRNA's never protected anyone from any other disease. They simply killed/sickened too many animals during the trials to knowingly use on people. That is, unti the CDC/FDA/NIH were corrupted and became an arm of our enemies foreign and domestic.
The distorted, defensively writen text by Paul Duprex should be evaluated in light of the fact that the University of Pittsburg, where Duprex directs Vaccine Research, is listed as a partner of the CDC Foundation here:
Our Partners: Organizations | CDC Foundation
According to Paul Duprex, "Rather than tinkering with the virus or its parts, this platform harnesses the “beauty of our biology” to deliver protection, said RNA virologist Paul Duprex, who directs the University of Pittsburgh Center for Vaccine Research. These vaccines teach the body to remember one of the coronavirus’ defining features — its spike protein — and prompt the creation of antibodies that can prevent it from infecting cells."
A person of conscience might struggle make statements for which they have no real proof, as proof is defined within the medical community. The 'vaccine' trials that Moderna and Pfizer are still going through are too small and too short, lack rigor and objectively, and utilize the inaccurate PCR test to determine whether someone is sick or not.
Duprex speeks about vaccines 'teaching' the body to remember...when the truth is the body cannot forget. The injection of 'vaccine' content bypasses feedback loops to go directly to ribosomes and order the productions of trillions of spike proteins without end. By that, I mean there is no 'off' button.
If the person has an allergic/anaphylactic reaction to the spike protein, no one can stop their bodies from continuing to produce the spike proteins indefinitely. There is some research making it past the gatekeepers now suggesting that the spike protein itself may be toxic, a particularly concerning detail as it can cross the blood-brain barrier.
When unable to supply an answer to a probing question, Fauci and others say something like, 'You have to remember, T-cell immunity is poorly understood.' At this point, I'm routinely stunned into silence. The vax hawks, including CDC 'partner' University of Pittsburg's Duprex all extoll the safety of the vaccine for which too little is known or understood.
Fauci and others driving the push toward vaccine passports, declaring the vaccines 'FDA approved' without standard evaluation, and mandatory vaccination, are exhorting children and pregnant women to have the 'shot', even though they've never been tested on those cohorts.
No one supporting the universal appliation of an experimental product with a history of failure willingly discusses adverse reactions to the 'products' greater than 'sore arm, chills, fever, headache etc.' But, the CDC's VAERS database is replete with cardiac arrests, paralysis, anaphylaxis, stroke, TCP etc. The overall picture in VAERS right now suggests the CDC is throttling the publishing of data to it's database where the public can see it.
Thankfully, some researchers and analysts are stepping into the breach. Below, Dr. April Rose walks through trends in the data that should give us all pause; ignore the CDC, they don't care.
PHD RESEARCHER ANALYZES VAERS DATA AND CONCLUDES COVID SHOTS ARE CAUSING DEATH AND SERIOUS INJURIES
The PBS article goes on to state: "Around 20 years ago, the work of two researchers — Drew Weissman and Katalin Karikó — helped overcome two primary barriers that had been standing in the way of utilizing mRNA technology: an inflammatory effect on the body that made test animals ill, and the fragile nature of the molecule itself, both of which hindered its utility."
That's half true, in a tragic way. They never solved the problem that caused the animals in the prior vaccine product trials.
In 2005, they discovered that they could protect their 'vaccine' from being destroyed by the human immune system (wise system, that) by encapsulating the mRNA in a lipid pouch. As I've said, the pouch itself appears to be a problem for some receiving the vaccine. But take a moment to consider that the human body initially identified the vaccine as a pathogen until they concealed it in a pouch. What could possibly go wrong?
Geert Vanden Boscche and others believe that the 'safe delivery' of the 'vaccine' mRNA to body cells sets the stage for life-alterning (or ending) conditions like ADE, sepsis, autoimmunity etc. due to the uncontrolled production of spike proteins for an unknown length of time, and without long-term studies to show how they impact human health.
The trillions of spike proteins resulting from 'vaccination' attach to body cells and recall the body is trained to 'remember them' as pathogens. This process has the capacity to place a immunological target on all body cells, including heart, lung, brain, liver, nerve cells etc.
The PBS article further asserts, "Only now, amid a devastating pandemic, has this technology reached mainstream prominence. “Given the choice, I would have rather avoided this past year,” Weissman said. “But we didn’t, and now RNA is going to be our future.”"
In terms of population statistics, and setting aside the agonizing loss of loved ones to Covid-19, it wasn't a 'devastating year' last year, however the MSM and medical leadership have labored to convince us it was. The average death rate from Covid-19 is really .2%. That number could have been so much smaller, had Fauci and the CDC allowed or 'authorized' the use of safe, FDA Approved, time-tested HCQ/AZ, Ivermectin etc. Imagine how many senior citizens died needlessly because deep state governors forced nursing homes to accept patients sick with Covid-19, while denying residents visits from healthy family members.
Pfizer's trials didn't include pregnant women, children, medically fragile persons or those with specific co-morbidities. Yet Pfizer found their trial cohort had a .93% chance of becoming ill with Covid-19 (remember, they used an invalid test to identify Covid). Pfizer reported that .05 % of the group not vaccinated was diagnosed with covid (diagnosis requires a positive PCR and at least one symptom of repiratory illness, which means it could be the flu etc.)
But I digress. So Pfizer's 90% effective rate is calculated by comparing the .93% of the unvaccinated who became ill, with the .05% of the vaccinated who became ill during a 2 month time period. Perhaps if the trial had lasted longer more of the vaccinated group would have time to become ill. Perhaps that's part of the reason why the trials were so short.
The mRNA 'vaccines' have already shortened the future of many. Let's stop the 'trimming back' of longevity and quality of life with further experimentation on the global population. Let's learn from Israel's ordeal before we let the medical apparatus pressure more people into taking the vax.
Let's avail ourselves of the numerous safe, effective treatment protocols proven to cut the rate of death among the most vulnerable by 85%. Early treatment is essential; Covid is much harder to defeat once it becomes advanced. This means planning ahead saves lives.
Early Treatment Protocols (Collection of Covid-19 resources, treatment and prophylactic protocols)
Well done.
(Watch the keywords)
Thank you ! Extremely informative !
“No, I accepted an opportunity to be in the control group and am being compensated handsomely for taking on the very small risk that I will contract the virus and get very sick or die. Statistically-speaking, someone my age and in my condition has about a 5 in 1000 chance of this happening. That is what the scientific data shows.
Since we don’t know what long-term effects the vaccines will have in people, especially the ones using mRNA technology for the first time in humans, and especially after such technology has had such bad results in animals, it is important we have a large enough control group of unvaccinated people with which to come up with statistically-significant results when comparing the two groups.
There is no scientific data as yet on longer-term problems that vaxxed people might have. For instance, we don’t know if the vaccine will prime their immune systems to specialize in fighting off the virus at the expense of not being able to ward off all the other usual viruses out there, such as the flu virus, rhinoviruses and other corona viruses.”
People I tell this too don’t have to know that the opportunity to be part of the control group is one I granted to myself and the compensation I am receiving is peace of mind.
There was name calling, and/or ad hominem, in the original post.
Not that I mind, it just shows emotion.
R-note fails to show a mechanism of harm, at least to me, as I have studied extensively on this. There are some things he does not understand and may not want to, his mind is made up. He worked hard on this and needs not to be discouraged in his labor. All respect to him.
We now know the vaccines were rushed out, non controversial statement. We now know that the treatments much maligned in the press would have saved lives, still controversial but the proof is behind the Ivermectin. We know that all vaccines cause harm, non controversial also but the problem is with decisions involving risk assessment. If the anti vaccine argument boils down to saying that Moderna is just as risky as the shots we give 6 year olds then the position will be lost, right or wrong.
Bagster takes a consistent “government bad” position. Ransomnote here adds a “corporations bad” position to that. Anyone who has lived beyond the years of youthful optimism will sympathize of course. If the problem with vaccines is that government force is involved, then I fear that must be addressed on a more basic heart level with the people.
Name calling is important when your desire is to combat men, not convince them.
If there is some kind of feedback loop to stop it eventually, I’d like to read about it, but so far, I haven’t found anything
~~~~~~~~~~~~
I agree. None of the content I’ve reviewed on either side of the issue proposes a feedback loop. The vaxx hawks make assertions but no one knows. Vaccine development expert Geert Vanden Bossche focuses the spotlight on this issue but the vax industry doesn’t offer rebuttal, just assertions.
Admits this trial is the first human use of BNT162(mRNA) but that it looks good on paper.(non-clinical data)
~~~~~~~
Interesting post. I found PFizer’s trial description convoluted.
Both PFizer and Moderna have trial date timelines that don’t make sense. I believe both could have made clear coherent diagrams of timelines and phase descriptions but instead you have to piece it together, and then the pieces sometimes dont’ fit.
The sentence I quoted above the line seems to be their MO. Fauci does it too, “We’re seeing indications that...” or “We’re seeing evidence that...” It’s not clinical data or standard methodology - they just find a data point that when cherry picked, can be used to float the sham along farther.
My opinion has been earned the old fashioned way - researching. I’ve researched enough to have made up my mind prior to today.
I normally post more on the science side of things (research, trial data, methodology, accuracy) and the physical impacts (VAERS, analysis of VAERS, comparisons to other countries etc.) and the strategic deployment of these fake vaccines (policy violations, regulation violations, revisionist behaviors, psychological extortion etc.)
” There are some things he does not understand and may not want to, his mind is made up” I’m astounded at how much the vaxx hawks don’t understand, yet they routinely assume I am a blank slate in need of tutelage, or else willfully ignorant for refusing to ignore my own research and embrace others opinions on demand.
I am used to being told I don’t understand when I disagree with others assertions; I think I first noticed that debate tactic in 7th grade and grew attentive to its use over the course of my life.
Its never good to speak in such general terms.
Governments and corporations are not bad in and of themselves. People are bad, and when bad people control governments and corporations, then those entities become bad.
At the moment, the US government is bad because bad people comprise it, from the tippy top to many state and local levels.
Many corporations are bad because those running them have agendas other than selling products or services and those agendas are bad, as are the people with the agendas, as they use the power, influence, and money of the corporation to further their bad agendas.
Never simplify the Bagster's position down to child-like slogans.
Name calling is important when your desire is to combat men, not convince them.
Name calling (especially if accurate) is very desirable when combatting men. Those men you are not attempting to convince, for they are entrenched in their position.
The point of 'name calling' is to convince the unconvinced or neutral observer. To turn the tide of public opinion to its proper course. To paraphrase Alinsky, isolate and ridicule. No one wants to be pointed and laughed at, so they will very often stay silent and retreat, leaving the field to the righteous 'name caller'.
Things are not as simple as you portray them, despite your virtue signaling. Its a complicated world, full of nuance and strategies.
Good post. I do think he is dismissing us as unidimensional and prone to knee-jerk biases. He did oversimplify it right down to ‘orange man bad’ pretty quickly, didn’t he? This is more subtle than calling us names, I think.
Have I ever made an ungood post?
I do think he is dismissing us as unidimensional and prone to knee-jerk biases. He did oversimplify it right down to ‘orange man bad’ pretty quickly, didn’t he? This is more subtle than calling us names, I think.
Very subtle indeed. It relegates us to trogladyke status. People very often think their ideological adversaries are incapable of deep thought and try to box them in to their own thought paradigms.
They are often surprised that people (like us) are very capable of complex thought, because very often they are not, and most people think ALL people are just like them.
Yes I am happy for you to speak for yourself.
I see what you are saying. You may not be seeing how you come across. I don’t think you are doing harm, but I will be very interested if part of your post proves convincing to someone. If you are willing to listen to correction, a man knows his own mind, then that is all anyone could ask.
You said debate tactic, but I think you meant arguing tactic or propaganda tactic or something like that. Did you debate in school? If you know debate then I could help you understand me that way.
I will enjoy scrolling your comment history for some more of your thoughts.
FReegards.
BrianD
I got the “government bad” handle or name for your argument and position from you. You are unable to see that this does not “simplify” the position. You were commenting a while back now on something from gas_dr and pointed out that he was a flubro, therefore government bad, but he was pro-vaxx so “go figure,” as if there was some inconsistency in him for this.
You admit in this comment that you are a bully, not an astute observation on my part, but in your childish simplicity, you will reply in ineffective insults as usual. You project your weakness on to others as you sincerely state that others are intimidated by your name calling. There is no nuance in this simple-minded strategy, especially this idea that name-calling intimidates a third party observer. Perhaps you noticed that gas_dr is now referring to anti-vaxxers using “Alinsky tactics”. I here ping him that he may note the candid admission on your part, and because I wish not to talk about him without his knowledge.
I can smell the ozone Bagster. They ain’t comin’ for me, but we’ll see, won’t we?
Here's the thing, daffodil.
One man's 'name calling' is another man's 'truth telling'. Telling somebody what they are is honesty, which soft people like you can't seem to handle. They like to prance through the world, naively believing there should be no strong opinions, no judgement, and that all opinions are equally valid.
Its weak meats like you, snivelling about 'name calling' that are responsible for the state we are in, in which evil flourishes and dominates the innocent.
I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom that I provide and then questions the manner in which I provide it.
I would rather that you just said "thank you" and went on your way. Otherwise, I suggest you pick up your tongue and call names. Either way, I don't give a DAMN what you think you're entitled to!
There is no nuance in this simple-minded strategy.
What is it with the importance you mamby pamby men place on 'nuance'? You sound like a Starbucks sipping, bearded hipster. Give me brutal honesty any day, thank you very much.
Watching people like you lift your nose and sniff in fake outrage makes me happy.
I can smell the ozone Bagster. They ain’t comin’ for me, but we’ll see, won’t we?
I think that's your funky draws.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.