Posted on 05/19/2021 6:20:22 PM PDT by ransomnote
Quote from the video; "The Red Cross says anyone who has received their vaccine cannot donate convalescent plasma to help other Covid-19 patients in hospitals. That plasma is made up of antibodies from people who have recovered from the virus, but the vaccine wipes out those antibodies, making the convalescent plasma ineffective in treating other Covid-19 patients."
I had a discussion today with a high-end vascular specialist MD. He told me that his referrals for coagulopathy went up, and went up AGAIN when mass vaccination started. His take is that the spike protein interferes with clot-inhibiting proteins; he rolled the names of three off the top of his tongue, but said their names too quickly for me to catch.
You’re unbelievably pathetic.
Remember, ransomnote, this is the voice of SCIENCE!™
That's cause they won't put me in charge.
The pubbies lost their nads after the deaths of Lee Atwater and Andrew Breitbart.
(What tiny, grain-of-sand-size marbles they had, anyway.)
Stop f*ll*ting yourselves over your sheer awesomeness and get over it.
One of the main things a doctor has is the legal right to treat and to prescribe medicines.
That, and clinical experience for treatment of acute symptoms, and perhaps differential diagnosis.
The point is, once one steps away from the immediate crisis -- say, epidemiology, biochemistry, ...the underlying politicization of all this --
then those specialized skills are no longer of overweening importance.
It's hard for any specialist to admit that there is a sphere in which his/her expertise in something else doesn't put them immediately at the top of the heap.
I noticed that they have altered some of their questions--for example, they now want to know if someone has had a tattoo within the last three months (instead of within the last 12 months).
Another useful post from bagster.
Another useful post from bagster
Another useful post from bagster...
Another useful post from bagster
I have nads.
Great big jumbo boulder size yarblockos. You could ride them to the store and back.
Nice try.
Here, Oxford University Press. And a place called Harvard.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075
SARS-CoV-2 proteins were measured in longitudinal plasma samples collected from 13 participants who received two doses of mRNA-1273 vaccine. 11 of 13 participants showed detectable levels of SARS-CoV-2 protein as early as day one after first vaccine injection. Clearance of detectable SARS-CoV-2 protein correlated with production of IgG and IgA.
Ok, THIS requires better explanation. Its hard enough already for a non-medical person to sift through all the information (and disinformation) to understand the pros/cons of the vaccines. Someone knowledgeable please explain THIS at a layman's level. How can we have allowed the 'contamination' 1/3 of our blood supplying population?
“My immune system has this virus down pact.”
Psalm 139:14: “I will praise thee; for I am fearfully and WONDERFULLY MADE: marvellous are thy works; and that my soul knoweth right well.”
(Thank You, God, for our immune systems! In Jesus’ name, amen.)
That makes you ...
:)
“I think there are at least 2 paid CDC/Pharma Users on FR.
This is one. My opinion, but I believe it’s true.”
I came to that conclusion about a month ago. Another one is FReeper 2aProtectsTheRest, IMO. Signed up exactly when Operation Warp Speed rolled out. I figure they have a Zoom call with the F Gnome every evening to report in.
I’m not sure what this is supposed to prove. The link specifies that S proteins were detectable in plasma and that antibodies then appeared and the S proteins disappeared.
What does this have to do with the Red Cross policy around blood donation for vaccinated persons? The Red Cross accepts blood donations from vaccinated persons. It says so right on their own website. The Red Cross is updating their policy on plasma donations to align with updated FDA guidance. It again says this right on their website. This is a discussion about Red Cross policy and the Red Cross’ own website is clearly the most authoritative source for what that policy is.
Yes. Minimum 2.
No other explanation how someone spends full-time on the threads and is a heartless SOB.
It is so over the top, it is obvious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.