URGENT! 5 DOCTORS AGREE THAT COVID-19 INJECTIONS ARE BIOWEAPONS AND DISCUSS WHAT TO DO ABOUT IT

ransomnote: Below, I'll post the content from the web page hosting the video. Here, I'll post the 3 topics planned for this video. They would like to discuss theories regarding symptoms and concerns regarding the vaccinated regarding:

1. Shedding
2. Infertility
3. Blood Supply

At the 7 minute mark, a physician describes reported incidents (children with bloody noses, blood clots in men, reproductive changes in women etc.)

Basically, are the vaccinated 'something' to the unvaccinated?

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
From the text under the Video on Bitchute:
Ever since reports have surfaced in recent days that people who have chosen NOT to receive the experimental COVID-19 shots but have been exposed to those who have received them, and have suffered what appear to be infections coming from these fully "vaccinated" people, affecting mainly women who have reported menstruation difficulties, heavy bleeding, miscarriages, and reduction of breast milk, I have been watching my newsfeed to see if any of the dissenting doctors and scientists we feature regularly here at Health Impact News would address these issues.

Fortunately, a team of 5 doctors in the U.S., all of whom we have featured in the past here at Health Impact News and are highly qualified to address this topic, just held a round-table discussion a couple of days ago to address these issues.

The issues they discuss affect ALL of us in the U.S. (and around the world) right now, and it is imperative that you take 79 minutes of your time to watch this video.

Not only do these highly qualified doctors discuss why they think this is happening, they also give practical advice at the end about what we can be doing right now to protect ourselves and stop this attack on the human race by the Globalists seeking to reduce the world's population.

Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.

Whatever else you are doing when you come across this video, it is highly unlikely that anything else you do the rest of your day will be more important than watching this video so you can be informed of the evil effects of these injections that are being censored in the corporate media and Big Tech social media.

Then share this video with as many people as you can.

URGENT! 5 Doctors Agree that COVID-19 Injections are Bioweapons and Discuss What to do About It (bitchute.com)

https://healthimpactnews.com/2021/urgent-5-doctors-agree-that-covid-19-injections-are-bioweapons-and-discuss-what-to-do-about-it/

LESS

You lost me at “Reuters” and I couldn’t get beyond ‘Fact Check’, which is this decade’s *conspiracy theory*.

Thousands of women are reporting menstrual abnormalities. Not all of them are on birth control. Miscarriages have spiked in relation to exposure to the vaccinated. Menopausal woman with a uterus are bleeding. Young girls and female infants are experiencing vaginal bleeds. The only common factor is exposure to a vaccinated person over time in an indoor space with touching, speaking closely or even intimacy.

*Something* is occurring. *Shed* and *transmission of exudates* are, so far, terms of art, ie: theories.

No one knows, but it is appearing as though exposure to vaccinated individuals are somehow involved.

Reuters is government pap and fact checkers are similar to diversity officers.

None of the vaccine materials are capable of leaving the body.

The vaccine does not make viruses. It make things that look like the virus.

Nothing can replicate, nothing can circulate, nothing can spread. The mRNA doesn’t even stick around.

Just read up on how it works.

This whole “shedding by mRNA-vaccinated people” is a conspiracy theory from hell.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Not everything outside the narrative is a conspiracy theory.

To refute the assertions in the video, you have to prefer information from the weaponized CDC/NIH/’Vaccine’ industry and they never tested their vaccines sufficiently to say much of anything, let alone that they can’t be transmitted.

The vaccines are comprised of a strand of mRNA and viruses are a strand of RNA.

The J&J and Astrazeneca are ripe for transmission because they include a ‘crippled’ common cold virus that may meet up with a transmissable cold virus and mix genetic information.

Also - observations of these experimental vaccines are demonstrating that they appear to transmit.

Also, research indicates the vaccine can imprint on the DNA of the vaccinated, then the DNA of the vaccinated would distribute the vaccine’s genome, likely shedding it.

Top. Kek.

I can see your lips move when you read from the 4AM approved talking points sheet.

Did you know there is experimental proof that material from the mRNA injections is found throughout the bodies of lab mice, 24 hours after the injection?

Have you considered the possibility that the adenovirus-based injections may undergo genetic tranfser with other viruses in the body, including, say, flu-viruses, thereby making the flu able to order cells to make spike protein?

Not shown yet, but a "plausible" -- I'd have to dig down more into the genetics of the viruses involved.

Don’t worry about it. Almost all of the negative responses to your sane skepticism are from Qtards. They believe any and all conspiracy crap posted on the internets. Remember it’s “where we go one we go all” and if that means running off the cliff of stupidity like lemmings then they are all in.

Says the tard with the screen name, 'Rightwing Conspiratr1'.

Do you not see the irony there? Its a large number.

And you can quit humping gassy's leg anytime, fan boi.

grey_whiskers wrote: “The second half contains a fallacy: that bioweapons are necessarily designed to kill people.”

Thank you for admitting the premise of the posted article is incorrect.
From the article: “Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.”

So, we’re not discussing the origins of the virus but the nature of the vaccine.

Once you dismiss the central nature of the posted article, the entire article falls apart.

grey_whiskers wrote: Lying again through your foul teeth, troll. *IN THE POST THIS IS RESPONDING TO* I explained how bioweapons might be designed and used, but not to kill people. You deliberately left all of that out, and misquoted me on purpose, like a CNN anchor.”

Where did I lie or misquote you? I made two exact quotes. One from your response denying these vaccines are bioweapons designed to ‘kill people’ and the second from the original article asserting that they are. Which of these two quotes are lies?

I’ll quote the original article again: “From the article: “Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.”

This thread is a discussion of the accuracy of the original article and not your theories of biological warfare. Clearly, from your exactly quoted statements, you do not believe the central premise of the original article. Your other comments are an attempt to change the subject away from the incorrect statements in the original article.

grey_whiskers wrote: “Why haven’t you been banned?”

IOW, anyone who quotes you should be banned for lying?

You're the one who should be banned for trolling.

Like I said, CNN anchor.

Where did I lie or misquote you? I made two exact quotes.

The answer to that, is in the PRECEDING COUPLE OF SENTENCES OF YOUR POST, where YOU cut-and-pasted how.

I explained how bioweapons might be designed and used, but not to kill people. You deliberately left all of that out, and misquoted me on purpose, like a CNN anchor.”

Deliberately leaving out something to give a false impression, IS a misquote.

Like if a movie reviewer says, "Seldom do I have a desire to smash the director in the mouth, and hit the producer in the nose."

And the advertisement for the movie quotes him as "A ...smash...hit"

You then double down and extend your lies:

You said “From the article: “Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.”

Then you said, "Clearly, from your exactly quoted statements, you do not believe the central premise of the original article."

You cut-and-pasted my own statement that it was a bioweapon (which agrees with the article) and a few sentences later have the GALL to say "clearly I don't agree with the central premise of the original article".

LYING. TROLL.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Category	Health & Medical
Sensitivity	Normal - Content that is suitable for ages 16 and over