grey_whiskers wrote: “The second half contains a fallacy: that bioweapons are necessarily designed to kill people.”
Thank you for admitting the premise of the posted article is incorrect.
From the article: “Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.”
So, we’re not discussing the origins of the virus but the nature of the vaccine.
Once you dismiss the central nature of the posted article, the entire article falls apart.
*IN THE POST THIS IS RESPONDING TO* I explained how bioweapons might be designed and used, but not to kill people.
You deliberately left all of that out, and misquoted me on purpose, like a CNN anchor.
Why haven't you been banned?