*IN THE POST THIS IS RESPONDING TO* I explained how bioweapons might be designed and used, but not to kill people.
You deliberately left all of that out, and misquoted me on purpose, like a CNN anchor.
Why haven't you been banned?
grey_whiskers wrote: Lying again through your foul teeth, troll. *IN THE POST THIS IS RESPONDING TO* I explained how bioweapons might be designed and used, but not to kill people. You deliberately left all of that out, and misquoted me on purpose, like a CNN anchor.”
Where did I lie or misquote you? I made two exact quotes. One from your response denying these vaccines are bioweapons designed to ‘kill people’ and the second from the original article asserting that they are. Which of these two quotes are lies?
I’ll quote the original article again: “From the article: “Every single one of these doctors believe that these shots are NOT vaccines, but bioweapons designed to kill human beings.”
This thread is a discussion of the accuracy of the original article and not your theories of biological warfare. Clearly, from your exactly quoted statements, you do not believe the central premise of the original article. Your other comments are an attempt to change the subject away from the incorrect statements in the original article.
grey_whiskers wrote: “Why haven’t you been banned?”
IOW, anyone who quotes you should be banned for lying?