Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How India can reduce COVID cases and deaths: Short of mass vaccination, the next best scalable way to prevent people from getting COVID is Ivermectin.
Trial Site News ^ | 04/26/2021

Posted on 04/26/2021 8:31:29 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

India recently reported over 330,000 new COVID cases in a single day, a new world record.

There is a way to dramatically reduce these numbers.

The problem is that India, like most countries, has been following the advice recommended by the recognized authorities (NIH, CDC, WHO, and EMA) for how to prevent and treat COVID. This advice is based on evidence-based medicine (EBM), which takes a relatively long time to discover and rigorously validate effective treatments. 

Today, India doesn’t have the luxury of time. Hospitals are so overloaded now that extremely sick people cannot get in.

It’s clear that it is time for India to forego the EBM-based recommendations and start considering all the evidence (including moderate and lower quality evidence as well as anecdotal evidence) in decision making. Then always select the option that is more likely to produce a superior outcome. 

India has recently started to do this with the new AIIMS Interim Clinic Guidance for Management of COVID-19. This is a step in the right direction, but I do not believe that these new guidelines go far enough; they are simply not commensurate with the problem at hand.

Here are some ideas that I believe have the potential to drastically reduce the infection, hospitalization, death, and long-haul COVID rates. 

Prevention 

Prevention is the most important thing right now. “An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,” and that is true in spades here since all your downstream systems are overloaded. 

Short of mass vaccination, the next best scalable way to prevent people from getting COVID is ivermectin. There are 14 clinical trials that support this recommendation. Of course, if you find a drug with more trials and a bigger minimum effect size and better anecdotal data, you should use that drug instead.

People should take a dose of at least .2mg/kg once per week. It won’t prevent all COVID infections, but it should cut the number of COVID infections that need to be treated by a factor of at least 4.

Note that this dose is double the amount normally typically recommended for prophylaxis against COVID. The higher recommendation is because the virus variant prevalent in India today is particularly aggressive. You may need to go higher at .3mg/kg once a week if you aren’t seeing at least a 4x drop in cases at that dose. 

There is a lot of anecdotal evidence that this works. And it makes sense intuitively as well. If you have a small fire, a small bucket of water is sufficient to extinguish it. If you have a very large fire (like the double mutant variant), it’s unlikely that the small bucket of water is going to work nearly as well.

Post-infection treatment 

If someone gets infected with COVID, the most important thing is to remember what David Ho taught us about HIV: hit it fast and hard.

Check out www.c19early.com. Note that fluvoxamine and ivermectin are two widely available drugs that are extremely safe and have the greatest effect sizes.

Why not give patients both of these drugs together fast and hard? Is there a better option that is more effective?

“Fast” means you deploy these drugs as early as possible. In particular, this means do not wait for symptoms before treating. Viruses are always best treated early. There are no exceptions to this rule. A virus is like a fire. Would you wait until the entire house is on fire before you called the fire department? Of course, not! Yet that’s effectively what you are doing if you wait for symptoms. Once you’ve lost your sense of smell or taste, it can be difficult to impossible to get it back

Treating upon confirmation of infection goes against the intuition of doctors who normally want to delay treating patients until they have symptoms. That can be a fatal mistake for this virus. 

“Hard” means going beyond standard dosing and treating with a combination of at least one antiviral and one anti-inflammatory.

The normal dose of ivermectin for COVID is .2mg/kg for 3 to 5 days. That’s not hard enough or long enough for the variant you have. You need to up the dose by 2X to 3X and treat for at least 5 days as long as there are no symptoms. Don’t worry. Ivermectin is safe at that dose. I’d love to suggest you use a lower dose and I would if it worked, but it doesn’t so I didn’t.

An effective dose for fluvoxamine for COVID is 50mg twice a day. Even with the variant you have, this dose has proven to be extremely effective and has a very low side effect profile (fewer than 3% of patients discontinue the drug due to side effects). But if it isn’t lowering the CRP to normal in 5 days in patients, you can up the dose as tolerated, up to double that. Fluvoxamine should be used for 14 days.

You don’t have to take my word for it. Talk to Amol Kothalkar. He’s a cardiologist in Buldhana, India, that has been treating COVID patients with both ivermectin and fluvoxamine. He’s treated over 100 patients with ivermectin and fluvoxamine and only one patient had to be hospitalized for respiratory distress due to COVID.

Finally, if you treat people early enough, and hit the virus hard enough, you will likely be able to eliminate all long-haul COVID (aka PACS) cases. That will save everyone a lot of pain and suffering, perhaps for the rest of their lives.

If fluvoxamine is in short supply or becomes too costly, a viable substitute is to use 20mg of fluoxetine daily for 14 days. The mechanisms of action are identical between the drugs. The only reason the clinical trial used fluvoxamine is it had stronger sigma-1 activation than fluoxetine. However, the differences are relatively minor and the overall COVID hospitalization stats for people on either drug are comparable (fluoxetine actually has a slight advantage).

Post-infection treatment 

Finally, there will always be patients who will decline and have to be admitted to the hospital. 

The good news is that there are at least 6 methods that can be used to reduce their chance of death by 80% or more. One of these methods (inhaled adenosine) has remarkable effects in as little as 10 minutes. Another method has been able to extricate patients from the ICU in as little as 48 hours.

The bad news is that few people know about these techniques.

I created a video and slide presentation describing each technique where the pioneers of each technique detail the technique and how to use it.

Summary

Based on everything we know, the above suggestions should make a profound difference in the situation in India if they are widely adopted.

One thing we do know is that doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result is illogical. 

As a world, our biggest challenge is no longer the virus. It is changing our thinking to adopt methods that are more likely to save lives than following the official protocols. The new AIIMS guidelines are a step in the right direction, but they simply aren’t aggressive enough to mitigate the problem.



TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: covid19; deathrate; gulliblefreepers; hoaxademic; india; ivermectin; panicporn; philippines; quack
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: SeekAndFind
I'm surprised they haven't taken the XI treatment and just lock them all in their homes and put bars on the doors.

I'd still love to know how many dead bodies they pulled out of those apartments and homes.

Nobody even asks them where they are and how they're doing.
41 posted on 04/27/2021 1:39:23 AM PDT by ssfromla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

why should anyone believe anything that the cdc, fauxi, and the scientific community says about a so called “deadly virus” when they refuse to speak up about the dangers of our feral government opening the border, inviting, and then distributing thousands of disease carrying invaders across our country during a so called “global pandemic”???...


42 posted on 04/27/2021 2:47:11 AM PDT by heavy metal (smiling improves your face value as well as making people wonder what the hell you're up to... 😁)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Read some articles on FR months ago where India was using Ivermectin.

Passing it out from kiosks on the street.

Don't how widespread.

Read another article that claimed most Indians were deficient in Vit D.

43 posted on 04/27/2021 5:03:23 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Welcome to the Matrix circa 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; ransomnote

44 posted on 04/27/2021 6:32:53 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Corrupt media, accurate description.


45 posted on 04/27/2021 6:33:57 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

Something I hope to never see or have to do.

Burning Bodies India Style


46 posted on 04/27/2021 8:51:18 AM PDT by deport ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider; Jane Long; null and void; SeekAndFind; metmom; Mom MD; FreedomForce; BobL; MAGAthon

India may be #85 in relative infection rates per million, but the “worldometers, Covid-19” site lists by total cases so India is 2nd behind the US, and Brazil is third. Here are these 3 countries deaths/million figures for today and 2 days ago. US 1781/1777 (+4). India 163/157 (+6) Brazil 1926/1907 (+19) So, US is slowing down, India increasing from a very low number, and Brazil mushrooming. I copied the first 26 countries, so here are some other figures. Some major countries are taking the Ivermectin and related news to heart and are doing well: UK 1870/1871 (+1); Poland 1800/1802 (+2); Mexico (major policy reversal) 1670/1671 (+1); Indonesia 166/167 (+1); South Africa (908/909 (+1); Philippines 157/159 (+2). I did the figures for the first 26 countries in Total Cases. Remember some of these countries have malaria and parasites so already had experience and availability of HCQ and Ivermectin. Here are some that are not doing so well: Argentina 1411/1432 (+21); Colombia 1455/1473 (+18); Peru (new president stopped Ivermectin in Dec.) 862/1879 (+17). See how smart Mexico was to change policy.

Here is my latest finding on Ivermectin, perhaps the best early middle, late, and post treatment for Covid-19. It appears that a big fuss is being made about Covid in India, because the city of Lucknow in the state of Utter Pradesh was having great success in lowering severe and deadly cases of Covid. Neither Pfizer and Merck (Moderna) want the world to be distracted by the possibility of a successful, very low cost early treatment for Covid-19, instead of their vaccines. I was given access to the material below at another FR post.

I went to your link on Ivermectin in India, which was fascinating. Also many, many comments. Aside from the fact that Phizer and Moderna use a new untried vaccine methodology I preferred to avoid, I had questions about their ethics and honesty. The comment below I found at your link’s voluminous comments is a mind blower, Phizer, a band of mega-thieves?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JESrh_2KOzo [This talk also covers Ivermectin changes/fights in Mexico, Peru, Slovakia, Australia, and of course in India, as well as others. Lucknow was having very good results with free Ivermectin distribution, Threat of national lockdown caused migrant workers in Mumbai to rush home to Lucknow/Utter Pradesh bringing new severe Covid with them. Ivermectin appears to work well for long Covid and the newer more virulent or fast spreading versions.]

” Pfizer received the biggest fine in U.S. history as part of a $2.3 Billion plea deal with federal prosecutors for mis-promoting medicines (Bextra, Celebrex) and paying kickbacks to compliant doctors. Pfizer pleaded guilty to mis-branding the painkiller Bextra by promoting the drug for uses for which it was not approved.
In the 1990s, Pfizer was involved in defective heart valves that lead to the deaths of more than 100 people. Pfizer had deliberately misled regulators about the hazards. The company agreed to pay $10.75 Million to settle justice department charges for misleading regulators.
Pfizer paid more than $60 Million to settle a lawsuit over Rezulin, a diabetes medication that caused patients to die from acute liver failure.
In the UK, Pfizer has been fined nearly €90 Million for overcharging the NHS, the National Health Service. Pfizxer charged the taxpayer an additional €48 Million per year for what should have cost €2 million per year.*
Pfizer agreed to pay $430 Million in 2004 to settle criminal charges that it had bribed doctors to prescribe its epilepsy drug Neurontin for indications for which it was not approved.
In 2011, a jury found Pfizer committed racketeering fraud in its marketing of the drug Neurontin. Pfizer agreed to pay $142.1 Million to settle the charges.
Pfizer disclosed that it had paid nearly nearly 4,500 doctors and other medical professionals some $20 Million for speaking on Pfizer’s behalf.
In 2012, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it had reached a $45 Million settlement with Pfizer to resolve charges that its subsidiaries had bribed overseas doctors and other healthcare professionals to increase foreign sales.
Pfizer was sued in a U.S. federal court for using Nigerian children as human guinea pigs, without the childrens’ parents’ consent. Pfizer paid $75 Million to settle in Nigerian court for using an experimental antibiotic, Trovan, on the children. The company paid an additional undisclosed amount in the U.S. to settle charges here. Pfizer had violated international law, including the Nuremberg Convention established after WWII, due to Nazi experiments on unwilling prisoners.
Amid widespread criticism of gouging poor countries for drugs, Pfizer pledged to give $50 million for an AIDS drug to South Africa. However, Pfizer failed to honor that promise. #fraud #science”

How can such a company be allowed to control which companies can sell their product to our government vaccinators? Have they kept AZ out of this country and limited access to J & J?
* I wonder how much Pfizer is overcharging our government for all their vaccine?


47 posted on 05/04/2021 10:35:12 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: gleeaikin

Please remove me from your ping list


48 posted on 05/04/2021 10:38:42 PM PDT by Mom MD ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Mom MD; saintgermaine

I thought you were interested in this topic. Is there also a Mom_MD that I confused you with. I don’t have a ping list, just try to send to people who seem interested.

sg - see comment #47 above


49 posted on 05/04/2021 10:42:52 PM PDT by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

From now on any people collapsing in the streets vidoes are immediately suspect.

China is the first thing I thought of.

Fool me once, shame on you.

Fool me twice, shame on me.


50 posted on 05/05/2021 7:08:42 PM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson