Posted on 04/23/2021 10:33:48 AM PDT by Cathi
Details for VAERS 1166062
Death, diet refusal, emotional distress, exposure via breast milk, failure to thrive, hepatic enzyme increased, pyrexia, rash, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura
Patient received second dose of Pfizer vaccine on March 17, 2021 while at work. March 18, 2021 her 5 month old breastfed infant developed a rash and within 24 hours was inconsolable, refusing to eat and developed a fever. Patient brought baby to local ER where assessments were performed, blood analysis revealed elevated liver enzymes. Infant was hospitalized but continued to decline and passed away. Diagnosis of TTP. No known allergies. No new exposures aside from the mother's vaccination the previous day.
I saw your post 8 so yes it tends to affect infants and kids.
There’s also 23.6 million children in the US under the age of 5. If we extrapolate that then that’s about 4.7 million kids under age 1.
If 1/3 of American adults have gotten the vaccine, then we can assume that 1/3 of the parents of the 4.7 million kids have gotten the vaccine. Or 1.5 million kids under the age of 1 have a parent that has gotten the vaccine.
So it’s entirely reasonable that the one case reported is not at all related to the vaccine and just 1 of the 4 or 5 kids that would have been expected to develop TTP anyway.
Okay I read your post 8 wrong. So only 10% occurs in kids. So that would mean a rate of .3 to .4 cases in kids per 1 million people.
And we have about 1.5 million kids under age 1 so still possible that this was just a random case of TTP that had the unfortunate timing to occur after the mother got the vaccine.
SMH
Indeed. There is a strong anti-vax movement (motivated by the belief among its leaders that the way to fight overpopulation is for more people to die from infectious disease); it was inevitable that anti-vax activists would try to dissuade people from getting the vaccine.
“I saw your post 8”
You’re confusing posters. That was not my post.
You’re right that was a post to you not by you.
Right there in the forms I had to fill out was saying that I was not breastfeeding. Strong medicines and breastfeeding do not mix.
Frankly, VAERS is being used to generate fake fearporn.
Though, of course, it's reasonable to keep an eye on that raw data.
Unfortunately, the drug makers have not adhered to that advise.
“Can you get the COVID-19 vaccine if you are breastfeeding?
While there have been no specific studies in these groups, there is no contraindication to receipt of the vaccine for pregnant or breastfeeding women. Pregnant or breastfeeding women should discuss their options with their healthcare providers. Apr 14, 2021”
And yet it was on my form. Extra funny since I’m a 51 year old guy.
Me thinks the people trying to discredit all reports of vaccine related deaths and morbidity protest too much.
The people injected who have seizures & die immediately or within 2-3 days, this previously healthy infant with an abrupt decline. Any honest observer would say the propinquity is concerning since the symptoms & clinical course are quite unusual; first step is the search for a causative factor.
Medicine involves detection -new foods, new meds, new fabric softener, new pets etc are things we examine when a previously healthy person is suddenly ill or dies.
It smacks of partisan bias not to note this relationship and keep watch on it to determine the level of danger.
So the excretion of drugs and food allergens into milk is impossible? If something enters the blood stream it can be excreted in breast milk.
Something occurred to me the other day (which I’ll confirm when I donate May 3rd):
What happens when a person gets a blood transfusion from someone who’s had these shots?
Do they ask whether you’ve been ‘vaccinated’ when donating blood? (I’ll know soon enough).
Exactly.
It’s an incredibly ignorant post. Vaccines have additives. You have to study each additive abd determine whether it can get to breast milk before you reach that conclusion.
Before I administer a vaccine dose, I ask every female if she is pregnant or breastfeeding. I haven’t had a yes yet. If a person answers “yes” to ANY of the pre-screening questions, the computer informs me that the person “may” wish to reschedule their vaccination for a later date. Mind you, they’re sitting right in front of me with their shirt sleeve rolled up at this point. In this way, the person administering the vaccine becomes the fall guy which is not entirely an uncommon occurrence in nursing. If it comes down to a nurse who makes $60,000/year taking the fall or a pharmaceutical company generating billions in profits, who do you think is going down? I also read the fine print to every person including the parts about unanticipated reactions and complications and the inability to sue anyone over unanticipated reactions and/or complications and I ask them if they agree. Every time.
I think you are responding to the wrong post. My post was disagreeing to the post that suggested that the vaccine could not enter breast milk. If it can enter the blood stream it can enter the breast milk. It is a small molecule which makes it easier to enter the blood stream.
I did not even address additives, as you say depending on the additive & depending on the injection mechanics which can inadvertently enter partially into the bloodstream, secretion into breast milk cannot be excluded even if some might call it unlikely.
I know someone whose wife had TTP. they had to remove her spleen as a treatment option.
No where in the article did it state that the woman was taking drugs or had a food allergy. (In any case, allergens are a separate issue, unrelated to vaccination.)
1) Vaccines are injected into the arm muscle, not the blood.
2) The body is very efficient about destroying foreign proteins and nucleic acids (the vaccine components). In this case, the nucleic acid is messenger RNA which has, at most, a ten hour half life.
3) The immune reaction occurs at the site of injection, in the form of T-cells, B-cells, macrophages, etc., that come to the location in response to the presence of antigen.
4) In the case of vaccination, the challenge is to keep the antigen around long enough for the immune response to occur before the body destroys the antigen.
5) The milk of a vaccinated woman would contain antibody-producing B-cells, which protect the baby against disease. It not only is not harmful for the baby to consume the mother’s B-cells, the benefit that B-cells provide is one of the major reasons to advocate breast-feeding.
You are exhibiting tunnel vision.
When injecting into the muscle it is possible to get some of the dose into a small vein.
Only to someone who is focused on pushing a point of view thinks that it is irrelevant that many things can enter breast milk. It is relevant because it is wrong to be dogmatic ahead of targeted research in an area where there is incomplete understanding and a poor ability to predict.
Your statements are the kind that are given to the public, incomplete in the details and simplified to be used for general understanding. These kind of statements are like those given on food pyramids, which were constantly revised as our understanding evolved. The food pyramids were not only wrong but caused great harm. Humility is an important characteristic for a scientist as is caution in theorizing ahead of the data.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.