Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SECOND STUDY This Time From CDC WEBSITE Confirms Stanford Study on Face Masks Being Harmful – Cause Serious Side Effects (Stanford Study was Censored by Twitter)
Gateway Pundit ^ | 04/20/2021 | Joe Hoft

Posted on 04/20/2021 7:25:02 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

More support for health concerns with wearing masks has been uncovered. This report was published and presented at the CDC website in June 2020.

It was brought to our attention today, that a report was published at the Hayride in March that is similar to our report from yesterday noted below:

Stanford Study Results: Facemasks are Ineffective to Block Transmission of COVID-19 and Actually Can Cause Health Deterioration and Premature Death

In March, the Hayride reported on the results of another mask study posted on June 10, 2020, at the CDC website. This study confirms our reporting from yesterday that masks aren’t just a nuisance but can cause serious health problems. The article recently uncovered was published by the CDC and it states in black and white the side-effects of wearing a mask, specifically related to the masks trapping carbon dioxide or CO2. The article states the masks cause breathing resistance that could result in a reduction in the frequency and depth of breathing, known as hypoventilation, in as little as an hour of wearing a mask. The article further went on to elaborate on the side-effects of increased CO2 concentrations in the mask wearer that include:

  1. Headache;
  2. Increased pressure inside the skull;
  3. Nervous system changes (e.g., increased pain threshold, reduction in cognition – altered judgement, decreased situational awareness, difficulty coordinating sensory or cognitive, abilities and motor activity, decreased visual acuity, widespread activation of the sympathetic nervous system that can oppose the direct effects of CO2 on the heart and blood vessels);
  4. Increased breathing frequency;
  5. Increased “work of breathing”, which is result of breathing through a filter medium;
  6. Cardiovascular effects (e.g., diminished cardiac contractility, vasodilation of peripheral blood vessels);
  7. Reduced tolerance to lighter workloads.

The Hayride reports:

The Hayride has covered this in the past specifically regarding the cognitive loss caused by COVID masks trapping CO2 where according to a Harvard Study breathing in as little as 945 PPM of CO2 lowers cognitive ability 15% and at 1400 PPM of CO2 cognitive ability reduces by 50%… What is also disturbing is not only the brain damage that is caused by the masks, but the adverse cardiovascular effects on the heart and lungs along with the reduction of blood sugar and dehydration.

We also discovered that the Stanford report from our article yesterday was censored by Twitter last week when former Trump campaign staffer, Steve Cortes, tweeted out the results of this study.

Why are US medical experts not telling Americans of the dangers of wearing masks? Why is Big Tech censoring this message?



TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: anthonyfauci; california; cdc; censorship; covid19; covid1984; facemasks; fakewaypundit; maskbullies; masking; masksdontwork; panicporn; scamdemic; sideeffects; stanford; stanfordstudy; stanfordu; twitter
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: SeekAndFind; ransomnote

I made a screen grab, from the Stanford study link, to carry around if any Mad Mask Karen’s try to force me to wear an unhealthy mask.

Most, here in TX, have chilled...but, we still have a few.

This should be sent to all docs offices, too.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7680614/


21 posted on 04/20/2021 8:58:52 PM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
But them docs n nurses ben wearin them masks almost 100 years in the operating rooms. How come they ain’t dead yet?

I bet some of them from 100 years ago are.

And I wonder if they put the same chemicals on them then that they do now. And I wonder if they wore them for extended periods of time then as they do now.

Somebody should do a study. Oh, wait. Somebody did.

See linked article for more information.


22 posted on 04/20/2021 9:05:28 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

Ping


23 posted on 04/20/2021 9:18:49 PM PDT by xzins (Retired US Army chaplain. Support our troops by praying for their victory. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ping


24 posted on 04/20/2021 9:20:52 PM PDT by WhattheDickens? (Funny, I didn’t think this was 1984…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Ping-not that it matters


25 posted on 04/20/2021 9:21:10 PM PDT by WhattheDickens? (Funny, I didn’t think this was 1984…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhattheDickens?

Why ping me twice? I started this thread.


26 posted on 04/20/2021 9:23:44 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7

They don’t wear them all the time.

Surgical masks are effective in preventing some bacterial infections, but useless for viral infections.


27 posted on 04/20/2021 9:26:03 PM PDT by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Thought I was updating rather than double posting. Apologies. Simply wanted to be able to reference your post.


28 posted on 04/20/2021 9:34:00 PM PDT by WhattheDickens? (Funny, I didn’t think this was 1984…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: bunkerhill7
The human body is capable of compensating for the lower levels of oxygen. Take, for instant the Japanese Ama (Sea Women). These divers plunge unaided to the bottom of the ocean 100 to 150 times a day, holding their breath for up to two minutes at a time while swimming vigorously to collect pearls in depths as much as 70 feet. They would begin their ama training at the age of 12 with an older family member and would then dive until they were 70 or 80 years old. Their muscles have a way to store oxygen to endure these dives.


29 posted on 04/20/2021 9:40:44 PM PDT by jonrick46 ( Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch
>> "they lead you to this article allegedly exposing the falsehoods: https://apnews.com/article/fact-checking-629043235973?fbclid=IwAR2dT7RwFNQoy2oJA-6PyBBFJlkCB13WAupTWBe5tR0Kmq5isgdj5rINCKs <<

As for whether it was a Stanford study, I can't find any good evidence that it was. My initial assumption would be that anything published at the US National Library of Medicine (National Institutes of Health) would carry a fair amount of credibility, but I see that it's taken from a publication called "Med Hypotheses", and the title itself contains the qualification "A health hypothesis".

The abstract says, "The current article comprehensively summarizes scientific evidences with respect to wearing facemasks in the COVID-19 era, providing prosper [typo for "proper" --a trivial error, but not a good indication of accuracy] information for public health and decisions making." In other words it's not the result of experiments done by the author at Stanford or anywhere. It's merely the author's opinion of studies done by others.

At the CDC there are contradictory opinions and links to contradictory summaries of studies. I agree that news of this publication shouldn't be suppressed, but see no reason to assume that its conclusions are correct.

30 posted on 04/20/2021 9:42:52 PM PDT by GJones2 (Contradictory studies about COVID-19 virus masks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Bookmarking what must be about the fiftieth study that concludes masks don’t stop viruses and cause secondary problems.


31 posted on 04/20/2021 9:53:11 PM PDT by TigersEye (Will the Younger Dryas Impact you? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

FWIW the author is a clinical exercise physiologist, not a medical doctor. That is a PhD, not an MD, though I’d note that increasingly PhDs are if anything the preferred medical research credentials over MDs.


32 posted on 04/20/2021 9:54:08 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

>> “Bookmarking what must be about the fiftieth study that concludes masks don’t stop viruses and cause secondary problems.” <<

It’s not a study except in the sense that it’s someone’s opinion after evaluating the experiments done by others. It’s an opinion.


33 posted on 04/20/2021 9:57:33 PM PDT by GJones2 (Contradictory studies about COVID-19 virus masks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GJones2

I guess I still only have 49 studies bookmarked then.


34 posted on 04/20/2021 9:59:50 PM PDT by TigersEye (Will the Younger Dryas Impact you? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: BurgessKoch

“an expert in or student of the branch of biology that deals with the normal functions of living organisms and their parts.”

“Clinical physiologists are also called physiological scientists, and they work in hospitals and healthcare facilities. Their job involves examining and monitoring physiological organs of the human body to diagnose and offer treatment for physiological disorders and long-term illnesses.”

https://www.google.com/search?q=physiologist&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS934US934&oq=physi&aqs=chrome.0.69i59j69i57j69i59j69i60l3j69i61.13932j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8


35 posted on 04/20/2021 9:59:52 PM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long
Yep... Thanks....

This is a good technical presentation of their research findings. Science! My overview was just that, no more.

Karens on the mask subject have no science, just mantras chanted over and over.

36 posted on 04/20/2021 10:02:14 PM PDT by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

>> “I guess I still only have 49 studies bookmarked then.” <<

How many have you bookmarked for the other side?


37 posted on 04/20/2021 10:44:28 PM PDT by GJones2 (Contradictory studies about COVID-19 virus masks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: All

Here’s my opinion. (You can cite it as “a South Carolina study” because I’m in South Carolina, or “an American study” because I’m in the United States. :-)

The article mentions how small an individual particle of the virus is. So what? It’s my understanding that most of the virus is not in that form but clustered into larger droplets of moisture. Also it apparently takes more than a tiny trace to make people sick, else everyone would have gotten it by now (in places were the virus is common). So to be helpful, all that’s necessary is for masks to reduce the distance that the larger droplets travel before falling to the floor.

Early on, before I even got a mask — and not knowing which so-called experts to believe — I did an experiment with a folded over t-shirt. I held my hand a couple of feet in front of my mouth, and coughed. Without the t-shirt over my mouth, I felt a distinct whiff of air on my hand. With the t-shirt covering my mouth, I didn’t feel anything. Yet air contains many tiny molecules. What seems to be happening is that most of them get through, but they are not propelled as far.

All the masks need to do is reduce the amount of the virus being propelled far enough to reach others. People are typically a good bit farther apart than the distance to my hand (less than 3 feet). What I did convinces me that air — and what’s in it — is slowed by a mouth covering, so the moisture droplets that contain most of the virus — and perhaps even smaller particles — are more likely to fall the floor before reaching anyone. That’s just common sense.

Now that nearly all the high-risk persons have had a chance to be vaccinated, I see no justification for government requirements that masks be worn. I’m not convinced by these arguments that masks weren’t and aren’t helpful, though (in keeping the virus from spreading — whether they cause other problems I don’t know).


38 posted on 04/20/2021 10:51:40 PM PDT by GJones2 (Contradictory studies about COVID-19 virus masks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GJones2

>> “...more likely to fall [to] the floor before reaching anyone.” <<

The word “to” was omitted — an indication of carelessness, so my study may not be 100% reliable (I’d estimate 98%).


39 posted on 04/20/2021 11:00:12 PM PDT by GJones2 (Contradictory studies about COVID-19 virus masks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: GJones2

Maybe ten. I’ve bookmarked everything I’ve seen posted here or run across in searches on other CV topics.

How many have you got?


40 posted on 04/20/2021 11:37:22 PM PDT by TigersEye (Will the Younger Dryas Impact you? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson