Scientific Proof: Mike Lindell TV Releases Irrefutable Election Theft Proof on New Television Special That Features World Renowned Physicist

Lindell TV ^ | March 31, 2021 | Mike Lindell

[McGruff]

Biden beat Trump, it’s just that simple.

I can't believe any intelligent person would say such a thing.

[consult]

Interesting video. Thanks for sharing. Suspect the only major media that might pick up on this is Fox. Perhaps 50+ ex-US intelligence official will call this Russian disinformation.

[Bob434]

Yep sure- Biden won about as legitimately as Rosie Ruiz did

[coon2000]

You are wrong troll.

[sunny bonobo]

t’s kinda amazing how it works. If you don’t conform, you’re an apostate. Oh well. I’ll take some arrows for how it is.

---

I see you’ve been welcomed by the swarm of Free republic thought nazis. These people still think Lin Wood and Sydney Powell are not complete lunatics and will eventually save the day. They operate a system of cancel culture that’s every bit as facist as the left’s. You’re not entitled to have a different opinion.

[Shadylake]

It’s sad, without those types this would be a nice site. Thanks.

[P-Marlowe]

It is a nice site. Maybe you just don’t belong here. Go back to the twitterverse. They’ll love you there.

[kaehurowing]

The most important thing is the Time magazine article about how tech, media and the Democrats conspired to “fortify” the election. In other words it came right out and said the election was rigged many months before.

[jonrick46]

I posted this on Facebook and they put a false disclaimer on it. People can still watch the video, but Facebook has to make up people’s minds for them.

[jonrick46]

Bookmark

[HollyB]

It sounds like FR isn’t your cup of tea. You’re new and come into a community and insult members who have been here for years /decades even. WTH ?

[Kevmo]

Very strong credentials. I wonder what the libtards will have to say other than “well, we stole that election fair and square”.

[Spaulding]

Not seeing any data or mathematical analysis of Dr. Frank’s theorem, and not intending criticism, because people who haven’t done this sort of analysis may find this explanation a little daunting let me suggest that if you are interested, give it a try. Dr Frank is an excellent teacher who, as he explained, just happened to be teaching data analysis to very bright students using election data to illustrate curve fitting.

Some, as apparently does Steve Bannon, dismiss Lindell because he doesn’t sound like a Harvard grad. Lindell clearly grasped the issues and furthermore is one of very few putting his money out to prove his point. Bannon, I’m guessing, doesn’t know much about mathematics, or data, wants an important position for showing his leadership qualities, and, doesn’t believe he can ride Lindell, who is keeping Bannon’s Warroom program funded, and is not willing to put his reputation on a guy, no matter how well he has done creating a very profitable business, no matter that Lindell was a successful professional gambler and comfortable with big data.

Listen to Frank’s explanations, pausing whenever a graph is hard to read or when you don’t quite grasp the variables, the horizontal and vertical axis. Frank has proved his thesis. Data curves drawn from arbitrarily selected counties will never show exactly the same curve proportions. Frank has sampled all over the U.S. and the implication is that Lindell will support his continuing until all states are examined. There will be retired statisticians who will support, and many hired to try to find fault with Frank’s work. I graduated in mathematics, and even spent some time with polynomial functions. I find Frank’s mathematics very reasonable. The observation that every precinct in Ohio and those examined in Colorado all show the proportionality, including the curious double artifacts, is about as absolute as you get in data analysis. There had to be a reason, and that reason was that all the votes were created by an algorithm based upon the 2010 census. The November election was synthesized. No individual’s vote was decided by other than an algoritm. I bought some pillows, but may need some new slippers!

What are the bets that Lindell’s proposed media hub was named after Dr. Frank? If truth and science mean anything, the problem Lindell, and all of us need to solve is getting a hearing. When Lindell talks about getting this “Absolute Proof” to the supreme court, I cringe a little, because the Supreme Court is not Supreme any more. Navarro’s work is easier to understand, but departments of justice are compromised, both at the federal and state levels. The states have ignored him.

Lindell is certainly not slick; I would prefer that he control his desire to tell it all, forgetting that he is interviewing a scientist who has provided a key to proving his case, including the case with the election equipment crooks. The maligned Sidney Powell has made claims similar to what Frank proved, or will have proved about most the the states having been involved. If 2010 census data was the source of the curve applied in every state, there can be no doubt. Frank’s may have been connected to Powell.

[jonrick46]

In the 2012 election cycle I did a phone bank where I called 5,000 voters. There were numerous people listed on my list of voters that did not live at the residence I called. I was amazed when one time I called for a voter, the people answered and I recognized her voice. We were friends and it became apparent to me that the Dems were sticking fake registered voters in residences they did not live.

My son had a job working for ACORN where he would call residences and confirm who lived at the residence. It was like a census operation. It confirmed what they were up to.

[Eagles6]

Bttt

[Dave W]

Bttt

[Fresh Wind]

Do you work for CNN or MSNBC?

[BroJoeK]

Shadylake: "Biden beat Trump, it’s just that simple.
The USA is far more leftist than a lot of people realize.
It’s not Canada level, but it’s really close."

sunny bonobo: "I see you’ve been welcomed by the swarm of Free republic thought nazis."

Here's your basic problem:

1. 2012 Obama got 66 million votes
2. 2016 Clinton got 66 million votes
3. 2020 Biden got 81 million votes -- allegedly.

So how did Biden get 15 million more votes than either Clinton or Obama, when all the indicators of voter enthusiasm suggested a Trump landslide?
Biden literally ran a do-nothing campaign with occasional "rallies" of a few dozen honking-horn cars.
Where did those 15 million extra votes come from?

Most FReepers, indeed, most Republicans think they were somehow "stolen", whether technically legal or not, something seriously nefarious was going on, and we don't understand why there was no major resistance to Biden's steal from the Republican "establishment".

So I ask you to consider these two maps -- one from 2016 the other 2020 -- and note first & foremost that nothing major changed, so can you point out where, exactly, those 15 million extra alleged votes came from:

2016 Presidential Election by county:

2020 Presidential Election by county:

[Mark17]

It is my opinion that many of them knew the fix was in.

Bingo.

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

.