Posted on 03/31/2021 7:30:47 PM PDT by Dr. Franklin
On March 31st, Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow, released a one-hour television special entitled, Scientific Proof: Internationally Renowned Physicist Absolutely Proves 2020 Election Was Biggest Cyber-Crime in World History.
The special broadcast features Dr. Douglas Frank who holds a Ph.D in Surface Analytical Chemistry for the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Frank is an internationally recognized scientist with over fifty scientific publications. In 1990 Dr. Frank discovered and invented a technique for creating three dimensional images of molecules resting on surfaces. This led to a cover article in Science Magazine, which is the most read science magazine in the world by scientists, and he was on the cover of the Naturwissenschaften, in Europe.
Dr. Frank has spent countless hours since the 2020 election following the data of the election returns county by county across such states as Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Colorado to name a few. Dr. Frank’s scientific and mathematical investigation has revealed that there was absolutely massive cyber fraud in the 2020 election.
In the television special Dr. Frank testifies to host Mike Lindell that deviations and mathematical impossibilities could not have been done by humans, by artificial intelligence and computers that were running before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. election.
Dr. Frank’s investigation reveals that the 2010 national census data was used to manipulate the 2020 election rolls and to inject phantom votes into the election totals. His scientific investigation documented and proved that numerous states throughout America had more people voting than lived in many of the counties.
The injection of the 2010 national census data into the 2020 election rolls facilitated a crime that some experts are calling the largest cyber-crime in world history.
Dr. Frank explains that the 2010 census was used to actually cast votes for voters that had either passed away ...
(Excerpt) Read more at lindelltv.com ...
I can't believe any intelligent person would say such a thing.
Interesting video. Thanks for sharing. Suspect the only major media that might pick up on this is Fox. Perhaps 50+ ex-US intelligence official will call this Russian disinformation.
Yep sure- Biden won about as legitimately as Rosie Ruiz did
You are wrong troll.
t’s kinda amazing how it works. If you don’t conform, you’re an apostate. Oh well. I’ll take some arrows for how it is.
It’s sad, without those types this would be a nice site. Thanks.
It is a nice site. Maybe you just don’t belong here. Go back to the twitterverse. They’ll love you there.
The most important thing is the Time magazine article about how tech, media and the Democrats conspired to “fortify” the election. In other words it came right out and said the election was rigged many months before.
I posted this on Facebook and they put a false disclaimer on it. People can still watch the video, but Facebook has to make up people’s minds for them.
Bookmark
It sounds like FR isn’t your cup of tea. You’re new and come into a community and insult members who have been here for years /decades even. WTH ?
Very strong credentials. I wonder what the libtards will have to say other than “well, we stole that election fair and square”.
Not seeing any data or mathematical analysis of Dr. Frank’s theorem, and not intending criticism, because people who haven’t done this sort of analysis may find this explanation a little daunting let me suggest that if you are interested, give it a try. Dr Frank is an excellent teacher who, as he explained, just happened to be teaching data analysis to very bright students using election data to illustrate curve fitting.
Some, as apparently does Steve Bannon, dismiss Lindell because he doesn’t sound like a Harvard grad. Lindell clearly grasped the issues and furthermore is one of very few putting his money out to prove his point. Bannon, I’m guessing, doesn’t know much about mathematics, or data, wants an important position for showing his leadership qualities, and, doesn’t believe he can ride Lindell, who is keeping Bannon’s Warroom program funded, and is not willing to put his reputation on a guy, no matter how well he has done creating a very profitable business, no matter that Lindell was a successful professional gambler and comfortable with big data.
Listen to Frank’s explanations, pausing whenever a graph is hard to read or when you don’t quite grasp the variables, the horizontal and vertical axis. Frank has proved his thesis. Data curves drawn from arbitrarily selected counties will never show exactly the same curve proportions. Frank has sampled all over the U.S. and the implication is that Lindell will support his continuing until all states are examined. There will be retired statisticians who will support, and many hired to try to find fault with Frank’s work. I graduated in mathematics, and even spent some time with polynomial functions. I find Frank’s mathematics very reasonable. The observation that every precinct in Ohio and those examined in Colorado all show the proportionality, including the curious double artifacts, is about as absolute as you get in data analysis. There had to be a reason, and that reason was that all the votes were created by an algorithm based upon the 2010 census. The November election was synthesized. No individual’s vote was decided by other than an algoritm. I bought some pillows, but may need some new slippers!
What are the bets that Lindell’s proposed media hub was named after Dr. Frank? If truth and science mean anything, the problem Lindell, and all of us need to solve is getting a hearing. When Lindell talks about getting this “Absolute Proof” to the supreme court, I cringe a little, because the Supreme Court is not Supreme any more. Navarro’s work is easier to understand, but departments of justice are compromised, both at the federal and state levels. The states have ignored him.
Lindell is certainly not slick; I would prefer that he control his desire to tell it all, forgetting that he is interviewing a scientist who has provided a key to proving his case, including the case with the election equipment crooks. The maligned Sidney Powell has made claims similar to what Frank proved, or will have proved about most the the states having been involved. If 2010 census data was the source of the curve applied in every state, there can be no doubt. Frank’s may have been connected to Powell.
In the 2012 election cycle I did a phone bank where I called 5,000 voters. There were numerous people listed on my list of voters that did not live at the residence I called. I was amazed when one time I called for a voter, the people answered and I recognized her voice. We were friends and it became apparent to me that the Dems were sticking fake registered voters in residences they did not live.
My son had a job working for ACORN where he would call residences and confirm who lived at the residence. It was like a census operation. It confirmed what they were up to.
Bttt
Bttt
Do you work for CNN or MSNBC?
sunny bonobo: "I see you’ve been welcomed by the swarm of Free republic thought nazis."
Here's your basic problem:
Most FReepers, indeed, most Republicans think they were somehow "stolen", whether technically legal or not, something seriously nefarious was going on, and we don't understand why there was no major resistance to Biden's steal from the Republican "establishment".
So I ask you to consider these two maps -- one from 2016 the other 2020 -- and note first & foremost that nothing major changed, so can you point out where, exactly, those 15 million extra alleged votes came from:
2016 Presidential Election by county:
2020 Presidential Election by county:
Bingo.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.