Scientific Proof: Mike Lindell TV Releases Irrefutable Election Theft Proof on New Television Special That Features World Renowned Physicist

Lindell TV ^ | March 31, 2021 | Mike Lindell

[Dr. Franklin]

Good thoughts. I don’t see the steal as a conspiracy. It was really about global warming. I say this because the leftists are prepared to do anything to save the planet. Trump is a clear and present danger to the survival of the human race! They need not conspire they need only to fight a common enemy with whatever tools are at their disposal. This is war and our side is losing.

For some perhaps, but they are getting played. The steal was a joint effort between the Dem center and the GOP establishment types to deny Bernie the nomination, again, and derail MAGA. The dirty deal doesn't include Sasha Cortez's Green New Deal. It's all about more endless wars for the MIC, and cheap labor. They are appealing to leftists with the rainbow power bit, but that is just divide and conquer to distract from the real globalist agenda.

[proud American in Canada]

Sorry but you have two strikes against you:

1. America is generally conservative and
2. The election was stolen.

Anyone who can’t see that is an idiot.

[proud American in Canada]

Me too. The man is apparently into a lot of things. More than pillows and sheets.

He seems like a very bright guy, and strong (he overcame addiction).

[BroJoeK]

Dr. Franklin: "Treason doth never prosper.
For what is the reason?
If treason should prosper, none dare call it treason."

I remember that book from the 1964 campaign.
Stormer was a fellow Penn Stater and we noted his passing on Free Republic in 2018.

Republicans' defeat in 1964 brought on Lyndon Johnson's "Great Society" a key benchmark against which Joseph Stolen measures himself and hopes to exceed.

The levels of pure nonsense today remind me of those times, which lead directly to Nixon's 1968 election and, arguably, to Reagan in 1980.
Today, it seems, we have maybe Trump in 2024 and then who thereafter?

[Dr. Franklin]

Dr. Franklin: "Treason doth never prosper. For what is the reason? If treason should prosper, none dare call it treason." I remember that book from the 1964 campaign. Stormer was a fellow Penn Stater and we noted his passing on Free Republic in 20

The quote is attributed to John Harrington (1561-1612) who first published it as:
"Treason doth never prosper: what's the reason? Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason."
I doubt it is original. It likely evolved from the Latin "Prosperum ac felix scelus/ Virtus vocatur" "Successful and fortunate crime/ is called virtue" attributed to Seneca the Younger.

[rlmorel]

I have taken some advanced math (enough to pass Physical Chemistry) and I can grasp the math well enough (I think) but I am having a hard time pinning down the scam. You sound like you understand the math and the scam-can you tell me if I understand this scam correctly? I am having a little trouble grasping it fully.

IS THIS TRUE: The KEY finding is that when the algorithm is applied to actual cast ballots in a county...it matches the shape of the REGISTERED VOTER BY AGE graph with a 1.000 correlation. Which is impossible without the algorithm application.

Using a algorithm (a 6th order polynomial for age groups from 18 to 110 years old developed from the 2010 census) which is then applied to the Registered voter database for each county (also broken down by age) it provides the maximum number of votes that should be possible for a given age range in a given county. I assume they had to do this so they

If one has network access to the Dominion Voting System Democracy Suite EMS Results Tally and Reporting component of the Democracy Suite (God, I hate even typing that) one can see who has cast votes at any given time, and who those votes were cast for.

(Do you agree they aren't as concerned about the ballot scanners for mail in ballot ingestion or even the ballot machines in the precincts being on a network, the information those devices feed to the Tally and Reporting component is what is important and what the Leftists need to figure out how many ballots to fallaciously generate. Most of the fraudulent ballots will be made up by fake mail in ballots. Do I have that correct in your opinion?)

Also: If I get this correctly too, the "incursions" of IP addresses accessing the systems (that were mentioned in his previous video) were not going in to actually manipulate the data or tallies directly in the database because that might be found out too easily. They were going into the system to GET data, to access the numbers to see how many people in a given county voted, who they were, and created ballots for those people who did NOT vote to be scanned in with no signature verification or other verification. And they did this so you wouldn't get a huge spike in any single voting age range. They could spread it out so it is better hidden.

They apply their 2010 Census Data (from the population by age spectrum information) derived algorithm to the data of registered voters by age spectrum (in a county) to see how many votes they can manufacture without overtly tipping anyone off.

For each county, they likely had a certain number of blank mail in ballots ready. They probably looked at their "Key Factor" derived from the census population for each age group, applied the algorithm to the number of registered voters for each age group, and began creating fake ballots late on election day, getting as close as they could to the poll close. They simply saw who hadn't voted in a precinct, spread it out over the age range, and using the names of voters who had not yet voted, cast votes in their name.

They had probably made a bunch of fake ballots based on projected turnout (or projected margin of victory?) ready to go, packaged up and brought to friendly co-criminals working officially in the system to be scanned in.

When the results began coming in, they likely saw that Trump was winning by a wider margin than they had anticipated, and they needed more fake ballots. So they had to stop counting (for whatever reason they provided) so that more ballots could be manufactured and brought in. Did they have to stop counting with a reserve of ballots in place so they could be mingled into the count with Trump votes, so that you wouldn't see a spike in Biden votes like this one?

Do I have that generally correct as you understand it?

By the way, I don't doubt they were ALSO trying to electronically manipulate vote tallies which would more easily be discovered in a FULL manual vote count, but would appear in sample counts (like they did in most places that forced it where they took a small sample of about a thousand votes and declared things fine) as small anomalies, but in a large or total sample, would show up far more easily.

In summary, is this the evidence?

[boycott]

What’s sad is Mike Lindell won’t shut up and allow anyone to speak. It is unlistenable. The content is very good and the experts are good but his interviews or whatever you want to call that is horrible.

Someone should tell Mike to not be so rude and allow his guests to get in a word. Don’t talk over them. It’s horrible.

I appreciate what he’s doing but he would be helping the cause more if he allowed a professional to do the interviews. He should at least try to be quiet for maybe 10 seconds.