Scientific Proof: Mike Lindell TV Releases Irrefutable Election Theft Proof on New Television Special That Features World Renowned Physicist

Lindell TV ^ | March 31, 2021 | Mike Lindell

[Dr. Franklin]

On March 31st, Mike Lindell, the CEO of MyPillow, released a one-hour television special entitled, Scientific Proof: Internationally Renowned Physicist Absolutely Proves 2020 Election Was Biggest Cyber-Crime in World History.

The special broadcast features Dr. Douglas Frank who holds a Ph.D in Surface Analytical Chemistry for the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Frank is an internationally recognized scientist with over fifty scientific publications. In 1990 Dr. Frank discovered and invented a technique for creating three dimensional images of molecules resting on surfaces. This led to a cover article in Science Magazine, which is the most read science magazine in the world by scientists, and he was on the cover of the Naturwissenschaften, in Europe.

Dr. Frank has spent countless hours since the 2020 election following the data of the election returns county by county across such states as Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Colorado to name a few. Dr. Frank’s scientific and mathematical investigation has revealed that there was absolutely massive cyber fraud in the 2020 election.

In the television special Dr. Frank testifies to host Mike Lindell that deviations and mathematical impossibilities could not have been done by humans, by artificial intelligence and computers that were running before, during, and after the 2020 U.S. election.

Dr. Frank’s investigation reveals that the 2010 national census data was used to manipulate the 2020 election rolls and to inject phantom votes into the election totals. His scientific investigation documented and proved that numerous states throughout America had more people voting than lived in many of the counties.

The injection of the 2010 national census data into the 2020 election rolls facilitated a crime that some experts are calling the largest cyber-crime in world history.

Dr. Frank explains that the 2010 census was used to actually cast votes for voters that had either passed away ...

[Dr. Franklin]

Not seeing any data or mathematical analysis of Dr. Frank’s theorem, and not intending criticism, because people who haven’t done this sort of analysis may find this explanation a little daunting let me suggest that if you are interested, give it a try. Dr Frank is an excellent teacher who, as he explained, just happened to be teaching data analysis to very bright students using election data to illustrate curve fitting.

I think he was using the 2010 Census data to teach calculus, and he recognized the pattern, but close enough.

Lindell is certainly not slick; I would prefer that he control his desire to tell it all, forgetting that he is interviewing a scientist who has provided a key to proving his case, including the case with the election equipment crooks. The maligned Sidney Powell has made claims similar to what Frank proved, or will have proved about most the the states having been involved. If 2010 census data was the source of the curve applied in every state, there can be no doubt. Frank’s may have been connected to Powell.

I think Powell's information came from the raw data that was intercepted, but it's possible Dr. Frank was involved in analyzing the algorithm as well. This isn't about how Lindell presents himself. Those who make this about what they don't like about how he comes across are just shooting the messenger. This is all about his message. Expect the corporate media to attack Dr. Frank now.

[Dr. Franklin]

In the 2012 election cycle I did a phone bank where I called 5,000 voters. There were numerous people listed on my list of voters that did not live at the residence I called. I was amazed when one time I called for a voter, the people answered and I recognized her voice. We were friends and it became apparent to me that the Dems were sticking fake registered voters in residences they did not live.
My son had a job working for ACORN where he would call residences and confirm who lived at the residence. It was like a census operation. It confirmed what they were up to.

If push ever comes to shove, those fake voters can't lift a finger to stop us. We have the numbers, if needed.

[Dr. Franklin]

I watched a 3 and a half hour hearing on the Fulton County ballots [in January].
The Fulton County mouthpiece lawyer spent two and a half hours explaining why we couldn't look at public information - the actual ballots.

Now why pay millions of dollars for voting machines that take longer to provide results than old-fashioned hand counts of votes? What was the point of that? Now, after the election, why can't anyone audit the ballots to see how well these million dollar machines performed? As Mike Lindell says, if someone claimed his product was inferior, he would welcome the opportunity to show its actual quality. No, only the High Priests of Democracy can see the ballots that are kept locked away in the Holy Of Holies. Anyone who is not High Priest who wants to see the ballots is a heretic who must be burned at the stake for witchcraft.

[Dr. Franklin]

What I found interesting was, throughout the election year, you heard prominent Democrats stating unequivocally that Trump was not going to win re-election.
I watched Leftist politicians like Pelosi, Schumer, Waters, et al going in front of cameras and stating this confidently.
I was taken aback, and many times thought “Wow, I have seen people whistling past the graveyard before, but this takes the cake.”
It is my opinion that many of them knew the fix was in.

Yes, the fix was in and they knew it. I was more offended at officials in GA predicting that the recount there would not change anything, and those in AZ predicting Biden's lead wouldn't change as they ever so slowly finalized their results. If they were doing their jobs legally, there would have been no such predictions, just a "let's see" approach.

[Dr. Franklin]

Yes, there were two elections. I can remember watching FOX on election night and they were talking about how we would see first the “Red mirage” followed by the “Blue wave” as all of the mail in votes were counted. The fix was in and FOX knew it. Like many others, I stopped watching FOX after that as they were part of the propaganda ministry for the legitimacy of the Biden Regime.

[MHGinTN]

When the obamaroid was able to cheat his way to a second term the end of America was in sight. The 2018 fraud which gave the House to the demon rats should have been duly noted and severe reaction to the fraud should have happened. But with a dying Republic and a dumbed down sheeple populace there is no reversing the death of America. The true sovereigns have been usurped because of their own indifference to the fraudulent politicl machine. America is now in the hands of the most eveil criminal enterprise we could not even imagine.

[Spaulding]

Dr. Franklin, happy to see that you have tried to understand what Lindell and Dr. Frank were trying to explain. Please don’t take it as criticism if I try to clarify what they were saying.

Dr. Frank is teaching advanced calculus. Most of calculus, and most applied mathematics is based on applying linear transformations. If you can write a function that describes a particular curve, a linear transformation can be applied to the function to move its graph around a projection of the “page” up, down, rotate it or change the scale without modifying the derivative of the function. Remember, if y=ax + b, and b is a constant, the derivative of b is zero. “b” is the offset because every precinct will have different populations diestributions. The rate of change of a constant is zero. Frank recognized the curve of the population density with respect to age from the 2010 census, and realized that it was VERY close to the population density curve published by the precinct of one of the districts he was asked to evaluate. Bingo! Look at the two lumps in the population curve from the 2010 census. What caused those bumps doesn’t matter. What matters is that the same distribution in every precinct in Ohio showed the same distribution.

It is impossible that every precinct in the nation has the same voter distribution, in particular every precinct has the same two bumps around 50 years of age. The test is what both science and medicine try to impose, and which neither seems interested in applying. Dr. Frank took the 2010 census curve and entered the initial conditions for each precinct into the generating function, which is a 6th degree polynomial. Polynomial functions consist of a sum differentials which, when graphed provide the shape of the curve which is the function. When Frank plotted the 6th degree polynomial, using the real registration numbers for each precinct, his predicted graph exactly matched the reported votes. As mathematicians sometimes say, “QED”. (That is what was to have been demonstrated.) If your proposition produces exactly what appears to have happened in the real world, your proposition is true.

Dr. Frank’s analysis also explains all the phantom votes. Colorado had one precinct with 150% of registered voters, some of whom are the result of no administration of registration records. This allows voter thieves to submit ballots for all those “phantom” voters. Volunteers are now beginning to visit the residences of “Phantom voters”, finding that over 30% don’t exist.

What is being exposed is an enormous effort to steal the election. The ability to apply the linear transform based upon the real population curve drawn from the 2010 census makes it less likely that someone with election experience would see some too obvious manipulation. It also explains why the machines need communication to linear processing machines in real time. The processing center, whether in Frankfurt, or Barcelona, or Canada, or China needed to know, in real time, how much they need to transform the entire curve to keep Biden, or whoever they are supporting, enough, when added to the phantom or printed, or drop box votes with no signatures, or underage, or votes from dead registrations achieve the needed election result. The adjustment needed to made in real time since there are still likely to be some legitimate votes for which there are real citizens and their signatures. Frank assumes that Trump generated more real votes than the left assumed, requiring the large adjustments appearing in the early hours of the mornings after Nov 3 election.

Like Dr. Frank, when the data logs from the Dallas analysis were shown, the same group whose data Lindell used in his first Movie, I recognized that log. I paused the display and recognized the “AWS” (Amazon Web Services) label, noting that the specific connection was to a Frankfurt server farm. I am not connected to those groups, but don’t doubt that they were monitoring network traffic. These are mostly very capable people, on both sides. No one talks because the cost of being discovered can be very high.

I didn’t say I don’t like the way Lindell presents himself. I think he is a hero. His style sounds like a hard sell. His message has more truth than almost any message squeezing through the censorship. (Dr.)Patrick Byrne probably has much of the information that (Dr.) Frank has exposed, though I haven’t heard Byrne (I’m a fan) describe. Byrn has some real experience with “big data”, and, while I haven’t confirmed it. when Byrn did his PhD in philosophy, there a venture into mathematical logic, but Frank’s focus on chemical engineering, and years of teaching the brightest young scientists, makes him uniquely equipped to recognize the hints provided by the data as actually reported. I believe we will eventually learn that this community is sharing data, not competing for clicks.

Thanks for thinking about this. It may take a few listens, but the Frank interview is the path, and will be “absolute” if and when Frank and his team analyze the remaining states. Most people will find “6th degree polynomials” impenetrable. A few people who listen to Frank a few times will grasp most of it. Frank hit most of the key points. Your understanding can help if you will explain it to people you know. I know more people who are more concerned with Trump’s gold plumbing than with why hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent to prevent him from leading us away from globalism.

[BroJoeK]

semimojo: "I also don’t believe anyone could manufacture millions of fake votes across multiple states and not have the conspiracy come to light."

Except that, it seems, the conspiracy is pretty much fully exposed, but nobody, nobody, can or will do anything about it.

[Dr. Franklin]

First, they understood the principle of inertia...that a body at rest will stay at rest, and a body in motion will stay in motion (for at least some time frame)
They knew that, if they got enough political inertia, that in the short time frame, their illegal and anti-American tactics, no matter how flagrant (illegal and forged ballots, interference in the electoral process, ballot harvesting, illegal voter drives by government entities that were focused on getting out Democrat voting or other actions) would simply be paved over by political inertia.
They KNEW that if they got the media to begin proclaiming that the election was over and simply stalled and obfuscated, that deadlines would pass and no matter what happened later, the election would not be reversed.

In retrospect, Trump had the political inertia on Election night. After he said he won and won big, that was the time to declare foreign interference in the election and send Homeland Security personnel or the U.S. Marshalls to witness or supervise the vote count. Once the cheating started, it became harder to stop it, and the media was running propaganda ads about "counting ever vote", regardless of whether those ballots were in fact legal.

[Dr. Franklin]

It wasn't the complete manufacturing of fake votes, it was the manipulation of the votes cast by preset algorithms. It's hard to believe that Biden got 15 million more votes than Hillary did.

That is why no one is permitted to count the actual ballots. Once it is demonstrated that vote counts don't match the ballots in one place, it will start the ball rolling to look at them elsewhere. Only the "High Priests of Democracy" can see them, and certainly not the people who must believe the official results.

Nobody believed that Hillary could actually lose but she did. As a result, the Democrats had four years to insure that would never happen again..........

Maybe, and maybe the Dems wanted to clear her out. Trump said Hillary is mad they didn't rig the election for her. Obama skimmed money off the billions returned to Iran to finance stealing elections. Maybe the Iranians vetoed stealing the election for her?

[Dr. Franklin]

Except that, it seems, the conspiracy is pretty much fully exposed, but nobody, nobody, can or will do anything about it.

There is an old English proverb, "Treason doth never prosper. For what is the reason? If treason should prosper, none dare call it treason."

[Cletus.D.Yokel]

In every State, except for 5-6, the protocol was to evaluate the difference between the candidates and the number of votes left to count.
When the difference is mathematically moot according to the candidate in the lead each election supervisor will:

1. Stop the counting (key point)
2. Enter all information into the election ledger.
3. Report the results of the election to the State.

By “key point” I mean to say, when the counting is stopped by the supervisor, the election is over and must be reported to the State (central board of elections).

Each State in question of fraud stopped and then restarted counting.
They began tabulating a new election with ballots withheld from the “books”.
Those ballots under the table in GA or delivered at 3AM in MI, were not ledgered in the 1st election.

There were 2 elections.

[proud American in Canada]

Yes. As the law would instruct a jury in a civil case, it’s more likely than not that a man who attracted thousands of people to his rallies won instead of a man who attracted tens of cars (probably occupied by one person wearing a mask, with the windows rolled up) to his “rallies.”

[Hot Tabasco]

Maybe, and maybe the Dems wanted to clear her out.

No way the Democrats would give up a presidency simply because they didn't like her..........

[Dr. Franklin]

In every State, except for 5-6, the protocol was to evaluate the difference between the candidates and the number of votes left to count. When the difference is mathematically moot according to the candidate in the lead each election supervisor will: 1. Stop the counting (key point) 2. Enter all information into the election ledger. 3. Report the results of the election to the State. By “key point” I mean to say, when the counting is stopped by the supervisor, the election is over and must be reported to the State (central board of elections). Each State in question of fraud stopped and then restarted counting. They began tabulating a new election with ballots withheld from the “books”. Those ballots under the table in GA or delivered at 3AM in MI, were not ledgered in the 1st election.

Basically, the problem with that procedure is that for confidence in the integrity of the election, the first order of business is to publicly announce how many people voted immediately after the polls close. This way the number of ballots is finite, rather than expanding to match the number of votes needed win. When the number of voters is infinite, then the counting doesn't stop until the anointed candidate wins. So what happens is that instead of canvassing for missing votes, these cheaters were canvassing for missing "voters". Thus, because the "universe" of votes wasn't finite, the judges let them keep going, to "count every vote" as they were created.

[Dr. Franklin]

Dr. Franklin, happy to see that you have tried to understand what Lindell and Dr. Frank were trying to explain. Please don’t take it as criticism if I try to clarify what they were saying.

Well I certainly don't take it as a criticism. I think everyone can benefit from your clarifications. It will particularly useful to forward to any Bernie Bros we may know, since I am sure this is how they screwed Bernie too.

Dr. Frank is teaching advanced calculus. Most of calculus, and most applied mathematics is based on applying linear transformations. If you can write a function that describes a particular curve, a linear transformation can be applied to the function to move its graph around a projection of the “page” up, down, rotate it or change the scale without modifying the derivative of the function. Remember, if y=ax + b, and b is a constant, the derivative of b is zero. “b” is the offset because every precinct will have different populations diestributions. The rate of change of a constant is zero. Frank recognized the curve of the population density with respect to age from the 2010 census, and realized that it was VERY close to the population density curve published by the precinct of one of the districts he was asked to evaluate. Bingo! Look at the two lumps in the population curve from the 2010 census. What caused those bumps doesn’t matter. What matters is that the same distribution in every precinct in Ohio showed the same distribution.

I was always better at understanding mathematical concepts and applied math than theoretical math and doing math in my head. I am a visual learner and that visual presentation is compelling. Unless it can be demonstrated that the graph is somehow wrong, the point stands.

It is impossible that every precinct in the nation has the same voter distribution, in particular every precinct has the same two bumps around 50 years of age. The test is what both science and medicine try to impose, and which neither seems interested in applying. Dr. Frank took the 2010 census curve and entered the initial conditions for each precinct into the generating function, which is a 6th degree polynomial. Polynomial functions consist of a sum differentials which, when graphed provide the shape of the curve which is the function. When Frank plotted the 6th degree polynomial, using the real registration numbers for each precinct, his predicted graph exactly matched the reported votes. As mathematicians sometimes say, “QED”. (That is what was to have been demonstrated.) If your proposition produces exactly what appears to have happened in the real world, your proposition is true.

Roger that!

Dr. Frank’s analysis also explains all the phantom votes. Colorado had one precinct with 150% of registered voters, some of whom are the result of no administration of registration records. This allows voter thieves to submit ballots for all those “phantom” voters. Volunteers are now beginning to visit the residences of “Phantom voters”, finding that over 30% don’t exist.

If I lived in CO, I'd be really POed. At least in other states the people know they got screwed. People in CO seem to be clueless at how the machines cheated them.

What is being exposed is an enormous effort to steal the election. The ability to apply the linear transform based upon the real population curve drawn from the 2010 census makes it less likely that someone with election experience would see some too obvious manipulation. It also explains why the machines need communication to linear processing machines in real time. The processing center, whether in Frankfurt, or Barcelona, or Canada, or China needed to know, in real time, how much they need to transform the entire curve to keep Biden, or whoever they are supporting, enough, when added to the phantom or printed, or drop box votes with no signatures, or underage, or votes from dead registrations achieve the needed election result. The adjustment needed to made in real time since there are still likely to be some legitimate votes for which there are real citizens and their signatures. Frank assumes that Trump generated more real votes than the left assumed, requiring the large adjustments appearing in the early hours of the mornings after Nov 3 election.

Yes, it was an enormous effort. The need for real time data to adjust the results to the algorithm also explains why it took so long for the machines to count votes. AZ in particular stands out.

Like Dr. Frank, when the data logs from the Dallas analysis were shown, the same group whose data Lindell used in his first Movie, I recognized that log. I paused the display and recognized the “AWS” (Amazon Web Services) label, noting that the specific connection was to a Frankfurt server farm. I am not connected to those groups, but don’t doubt that they were monitoring network traffic. These are mostly very capable people, on both sides. No one talks because the cost of being discovered can be very high.

If this goes to court, someone needs to go on the record. Hopefully, Arturo D'Elia's confession and data are enough.

I didn’t say I don’t like the way Lindell presents himself. I think he is a hero. His style sounds like a hard sell. His message has more truth than almost any message squeezing through the censorship. (Dr.)Patrick Byrne probably has much of the information that (Dr.) Frank has exposed, though I haven’t heard Byrne (I’m a fan) describe. Byrn has some real experience with “big data”, and, while I haven’t confirmed it. when Byrn did his PhD in philosophy, there a venture into mathematical logic, but Frank’s focus on chemical engineering, and years of teaching the brightest young scientists, makes him uniquely equipped to recognize the hints provided by the data as actually reported. I believe we will eventually learn that this community is sharing data, not competing for clicks.

That wasn't necessarily directed at you. Others here don't like Lindell. They say he talks to much. I have a lot of respect for Byrne. He spoke some blunt truths to Trump trying to get him to have the feds count the ballots to prove the fraud. If only that had been done...

Thanks for thinking about this. It may take a few listens, but the Frank interview is the path, and will be “absolute” if and when Frank and his team analyze the remaining states. Most people will find “6th degree polynomials” impenetrable. A few people who listen to Frank a few times will grasp most of it. Frank hit most of the key points. Your understanding can help if you will explain it to people you know. I know more people who are more concerned with Trump’s gold plumbing than with why hundreds of billions of dollars have been spent to prevent him from leading us away from globalism.

Again, unless someone can demonstrate his graphing in wrong, most people will understand that visual. People might watch the presentation again after reading your further explanation. Everyone should share this with a Bernie Bro. I would like to see a similar analysis of Biden's primary "wins". It would be the icing on the cake that everything about this election was fake.

[Dr. Franklin]

No way the Democrats would give up a presidency simply because they didn't like her..........

There are Dems who can't believe that the Republicans in AZ or GA would ever throw an election either, but it certainly happened. It's possible there were Dems who wanted her gone, the same way there were Republicans who wanted Nixon gone, like Bush.

[BDParrish]

My friend said, "Why do you have to retreat into a conspiracy theory? Virginia has gone commie left especially here in ...etc., etc."

Calling anything a conspiracy theory is not an argument, though as a propaganda tactic it is very effective in stifling discussion. There is real data that has been presented and yelling "conspiracy" allows them to avoid the uncomfortable facts. Thanks for your help Dr F!

[Dr. Franklin]

My friend said, "Why do you have to retreat into a conspiracy theory? Virginia has gone commie left especially here in ...etc., etc." Calling anything a conspiracy theory is not an argument, though as a propaganda tactic it is very effective in stifling discussion. There is real data that has been presented and yelling "conspiracy" allows them to avoid the uncomfortable facts. Thanks for your help Dr F!

So ask your friend if he thinks that John Wilkes Booth acted alone in the assassination of Lincoln. If he really thinks conspiracies never happened then he must think the U.S. hanged four innocent people for that crime. Ask him if he denies that Hitler burned the Reichstag, or that the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact started WWII. The "conspiracy theory" canard works as a propaganda ploy because many people don't want to believe how things really work, and how devious our elites really are. As Jack Nicholson famously said in a famous role, "You can't handle the truth!" That would be my retort to your friend.

[BDParrish]

Good thoughts.
I don’t see the steal as a conspiracy.
It was really about global warming. I say this because the leftists are prepared to do anything to save the planet. Trump is a clear and present danger to the survival of the human race! They need not conspire they need only to fight a common enemy with whatever tools are at their disposal. This is war and our side is losing.