Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Americans are wildly misinformed about the risk of hospitalization from Covid-19, survey shows. Here’s Why…
Foundation for Economic Education ^ | 03/25/2021 | Jon Miltimore

Posted on 03/25/2021 9:49:53 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

A recent survey found that more than one-third of Americans overestimate by as much as a factor of ten the probability a person with COVID-19 will require hospitalization.

Researchers involved in the Franklin Templeton/Gallup study asked Americans in December what “percentage of people who have been infected by the coronavirus needed to be hospitalized." The correct answer is not precisely known, the authors note, but the best available estimates place the figure between 1 and 5 percent.

Many people’s perceptions of the data, however, were completely off.

“Less than one in five U.S. adults (18%) give a correct answer of between 1 and 5%,” the study authors said. “Many adults (35%) say that at least half of infected people need hospitalization. If that were true, the millions of resulting patients would have overwhelmed hospitals throughout the pandemic.”

The authors of the study say the conclusion is clear.

“The U.S. public is also deeply misinformed about the severity of the virus for the average infected person,” the study’s authors stated.

~60% of Americans think the chances somebody with Covid must be hospitalized are ~10x higher than they actually are

Survey by Gallup and Franklin Templeton pic.twitter.com/RgyxiJmcfD — Eli Klein (@TheEliKlein) March 20, 2021

Why Are Americans so Misinformed?

The obvious question is why Americans are so wildly misinformed about the true risks of COVID-19.

One possibility is that Americans are receiving information that is skewing their sense of reality, and research confirms this hypothesis.

Studies have shown that US media in particular created a climate of fear by publishing a deluge of negative news in 2020. One Ivy League-led study found that 91 percent of US stories in major media were negative in tone (compared to just 54 percent in non-US media)—even when the virus was in retreat and positive results were being achieved.

'Those who overestimate risks to young people or hold an exaggerated sense of risk upon infection are more likely to favor closing schools, restaurants, and other businesses,' the authors note.

“The negativity of the U.S. major media is notable even in areas with positive scientific developments including school re-openings and vaccine trials,” researchers noted. “Stories of increasing COVID-19 cases outnumber stories of decreasing cases by a factor of 5.5 even during periods when new cases are declining.”

A new @nberpubs paper shows how US media created a climate of #COVID19 fear.

“Ninety one percent of stories by US major media outlets are negative in tone versus fifty four percent for non-U.S. major sources and sixty five percent for scientific journals,” the authors concluded. pic.twitter.com/wIXRQYiuKw — Jon Miltimore (@miltimore79) December 1, 2020

As I noted when the study was released, a global pandemic isn’t exactly a cheerful topic. Yet this fact alone doesn’t explain the discrepancy between US media coverage and non-US media. Nor does it explain why negative news trends continue even during positive developments—such as declines in cases, hospitalizations, and deaths, as well as vaccine breakthroughs.

The steady drumbeat of negativity was described as “panic porn” by some media critics.

“Enough with the 'life will never be the same' headlines,” HBO pundit Bill Maher said back in April. “Everything looks scary when you magnify it a thousand times.… We need the news to calm down and treat us like adults.”

That didn’t happen, however. Months later, as the virus had receded and scientists concluded COVID was not as deadly as previously thought, the media were still engaging in panic porn, characterizing Florida’s laissez-faire approach to the pandemic as a “death march.”

In his work Crisis and Leviathan, the economist Robert Higgs observed that crises have been utilized to mount the biggest government power grabs in modern history.

Why media and public officials engaged in panic porn for months is a discussion for another day. What’s apparent is that the phenomenon severely skewed Americans' sense of reality as it relates to the actual dangers of COVID-19, a virus that does not require hospitalization for up to 99 percent of those infected.

Unfortunately, authors of the Franklin Templeton/Gallup study say, the disconnect has real-world consequences.

“Those who overestimate risks to young people or hold an exaggerated sense of risk upon infection are more likely to favor closing schools, restaurants, and other businesses,” the authors note.

Lockdowns: A Policy of Panic

The harms of these lockdown policies are well-documented: severe mental health deterioration, mass social unrest, health procedures deferred or foregone, soaring global poverty, increased suicide, extreme loneliness, and many others.

FEE’s Brad Polumbo recently testified before the US Senate on some of these dangers, noting that doctors across the world warn lockdowns have resulted in an “international epidemic” of child suicide.

These were policies born of panic.

“When people feel fear, they’re much more willing to accept anything that makes the world seem a little safer,” Sean Malone noted early in the pandemic in an episode of Out of Frame.

For far too long Americans were told they must sacrifice liberty by embracing lockdowns or risk mass fatalities. This was always a false choice, and a dangerous one. The reality is, passing sweeping legislation during panics is a recipe for bad outcomes. But all too often, that is precisely what happens.

In his work Crisis and Leviathan, the economist Robert Higgs observed that crises have been utilized to mount the biggest government power grabs in modern history. During the Great Depression it was the New Deal. Following the 9-11 attacks it was the War on Terror and the Patriot Act (and everything that came with them). In 2020 it was the lockdowns.

Each of these historic encroachments was driven by mass panic. In each instance, only in hindsight did it become apparent that the greater danger we faced was fear itself.

This isn’t to say there are not real threats in the world. The pandemic, terrorism, and the Great Depression were all genuine threats.

It’s only to say we must reject panic in our decision making, and those who would have us abandon freedom for the false promise of safety.

Additional Reading:

5 Charts That Show Sweden’s Strategy Worked. The Lockdowns Failed

WHO Reverses Course, Now Advises Against Use of 'Punishing' Lockdowns

4 Life-Threatening Unintended Consequences of the Lockdowns

Lockdown Despotism and the “Control Panel” Delusion

Harvard Researchers: Nearly Half of Young Adults Showing Signs of Depression Amid Pandemic

Why Sweden Succeeded in “Flattening the Curve” and New York Failed



TOPICS: Health/Medicine; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: covid19; hospitalization; misinformation

1 posted on 03/25/2021 9:49:53 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

2 posted on 03/25/2021 9:50:28 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“Ninety one percent of stories by US major media outlets are negative in tone versus fifty four percent for non-U.S. major sources and sixty five percent for scientific journals,” the authors concluded.


3 posted on 03/25/2021 9:51:22 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Americans are misinformed about everything.


4 posted on 03/25/2021 9:52:49 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy ("I see you did something -- why you so racist?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

“Why Are Americans so Misinformed?”

I heard they had gaggles of scientists looking into this very question, but they came up baffled. People seem to be even more misinformed on global warming but scientists are even more baffled


5 posted on 03/25/2021 9:53:32 AM PDT by dsrtsage (Complexity is merely simplicity lacking imagination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

“Americans are misinformed about everything.”

Everyone, including scientists and government employees, have their own reality.


6 posted on 03/25/2021 10:04:23 AM PDT by alternatives? (If our borders are not secure, why fund an army?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

COVID is giving them something to be hysterical about in the absence of a cat 5 hurricane.


7 posted on 03/25/2021 10:11:23 AM PDT by fruser1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

For more than a year the country has been fed a diet of misinformation, disinformation, massaged statistics, contradictions and outright lies by government, media and the medical community......

THAT’S WHY!!!!!!


8 posted on 03/25/2021 10:37:07 AM PDT by Roccus (Prima di ogni altra cosa, siate armati!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

For the last one hundred years they have been.

They also overeat, overweight, and are lazy, but those are other topics.


9 posted on 03/25/2021 10:55:42 AM PDT by Roman_War_Criminal (Jesus + Something = Nothing ; Jesus + Nothing = Everything )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
A liberal friend of mine posted a picture of her getting the shot. She was literally crying. She really believes the panic porn that COVID would kill her if she didn't lock down. She thinks her life may now be saved.

Another acquaintance said he and his wife had not had a meal out in a year. They actually believe if they go to a restaurant they will die.

Fauci and his ilk are just plain evil. They inflicted this damage to America just because they wanted to use it to get rid of Orange Man.

10 posted on 03/25/2021 12:18:41 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I don’t believe it is anywhere near even 1%, more like a tenth of a percent at best


11 posted on 03/25/2021 12:37:45 PM PDT by eyeamok (founded in cynicism, wrapped in sarcasm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

It’d be useful if we could get the total number of cases which required medical care and potentially hospitalization

this would give us an exact percentage of those exposed compared to those infected and needing medical care.

currently, the total exposed is ~31m with 560k dead (tho some of those could be misdiagnosed as dying WITH instead of FROM covid)

if we knew the number of hospitalizations, we’d better understand the chance of being infected once exposed. and from there we can better predict the outcome based on the demographics of the patients


12 posted on 03/25/2021 2:19:34 PM PDT by sten (fighting tyranny never goes out of style )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; All

“Democrats were much more likely to overestimate the harms of COVID-19, according to the Franklin Templeton/Gallup study, with 41% believing over half of coronavirus patients would require hospitalizations, compared to 28% of Republicans.

“Republicans were also more likely to identify the correct risk of hospitalization from the virus, with 26% answering between 1%-5% of patients would require hospitalizations...”

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/americans-overestimate-hospitalization-covid-study


13 posted on 06/08/2021 8:04:27 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson